Sp1at Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Please rat them i want to know what i can fixPease rate not rat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp1at Posted November 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 im geting anonyed how it has 23 views but no reply so somebody reply please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somenoob Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 These are kind of bland and short, with the concept leading too hurting you much more then hursting your opponent. overall though the simplicity is rather nice, i would say 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp1at Posted November 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 thats a reasonable reponsonei thought you would say something about the 4000 attack points Guardian Griffin the Extreme one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychicplayer Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 like 8.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echofon Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 I'll be the first to give an honest review I guess. You're cards are good and the graphics are nice, but there are a few flaws. First when you state attack and defense points use this format. I'll use 500 for instance. -increase this card by 500 ATK points- or - 500 DEF points- Personally i wouldnt use these cards. They definitely arent worth the life points you give up. Maybe make it lower. You should also increase the star level so that the ATK/DEF is more understandable, even though the effect makes the ATK/DEF reasonable. Imperial Guard Pyramid shouldnt cost life points to use, because you're already giving up tons of it with your monsters. Guardian Hero of the Gods shouldnt have to give up life points to attack either, because u have to use 3 tributes to summon it, and that should be enough. Guardian Sphinx the Unknown Cat should have 8-7 stars. You should increase the defense as well. Honestly, directing an attack to another opponent is not that great of a feat, especially because there are trap cards such as Shift for that kind of thing. For eternal beast I noticed some word play issues. YOu should change the discription to around "When this card attacks, you may choose to attack your opponent's life points directly." But all in all, these are some pretty decent cards! I think you have serious potential to make more like this series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somenoob Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 i agree with the above. its got potential, and really, thats all it takes yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDExcelion311 Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Well there are some OCG errors and some of the pics aren't that great. You should plorbably try not to have them all have such high attacks and try to make some of them lower level and easy to summon.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 These pic are really bad They are either blurry, have no background or are just bad The ocg is off And most are verey op'd I suggest looking at the ocg thread here in Y.C.M to help you on ocg so you can make better cards and get higher rates on your cards. Still i love the idea so that gets you somewhere with me Though i have to rate 4/10 keep trying you will get better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 guardian hero of the gods is just Nightmare from SC4, change that picture most of the card effects are both boring and OPed (too easy to summon, some have too high of a level given their stats, etc) 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.