Tempest Dahlia Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 R/F/H/L 182 laquari1 bestiari2 murmillo3 samnite1 darius2 equeste1 x saber airbellum1 rescue kitty3 test tiger1 BW gale1 cydra 173 ancient forest1 terra3 book of moon2 mbaas1 storm1 trunade1 mst1 lv1 bcon2 gb proving ground1 smashing 52 chariot2 bottomles1 TT side, extra Just bought 3 AF 2 days ago, and was experimening and did this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 ... Yeah... Ancient forest glads... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 May l kindly ask why no one is responding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord dmoc Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Maybe because it kills glads I don't know. I don't know if it kills glads or not. More good glads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 It dosen't. Elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Waboku'll be a lot less useful in here what with Ancient Forest and all. I'd neg 'em for two Chariots and a Smashing. Once that's done, neg Secutor, as it would need Wabokus to function, and Wabokus won't work if your opponent doesn't want to attack anyway because of Forest. Focus on field presence and control. Throw in a CyDra for good measure. It gives you field presence and the ability to Fortress a Catastor, which can be a pest for GBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Thx, will edit.What to neg for cydra?Oh. Forget it XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Yeah Secutor. ;] Also, adjust Spell count to 17 now since you added the Smashing just to avoid confusion amirite? ^_____^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 SRSLY. What. The. ************************************k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Doubt you'll need it, but MF? This looks pretty solid as is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 I sided it in case l fight BW, but it works fine without it mained XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Retiari isn't so great imo you should run a second darius instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Retiari isn't so great imo you should run a second darius instead. Remove retiari...? He offers great control over the grave, as the op won't be seeimg much field presence...... I dunno. I'll playtest XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Actually I don't know about Darius... he was useful in my build because I used prisma... but I do know, retiari is much too weak to hold up on his own and removing one card at a time is slow, far too slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Actually I don't know about Darius... he was useful in my build because I used prisma... but I do know' date=' retiari is much too weak to hold up on his own and removing one card at a time is slow, far too slow.[/quote'] I'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Actually I don't know about Darius... he was useful in my build because I used prisma... but I do know' date=' retiari is much too weak to hold up on his own and removing one card at a time is slow, far too slow.[/quote'] I'll see. Without Waboku, Retiari is useless. You should toss him for either a Laquari, Murmillo, or Darius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Oh yeah; 2 murmillo is actually pro tech now. But I still think Darius is more useful. I've found Hoplomus pretty worthless. You might as well drop him for, idk, a Laquari, Murmillo, or Samnite (three samnite is pretty good, even if you draw one you can still pull out 2x with cat). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Changes made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Side the Hoplomus. In a lot of games I've played, he becomes a great wall if you're backed into a corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 I already did, thx though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 You took all my secondary suggestions but not the main one, seriously you need to find space for a second darius in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 You took all my secondary suggestions but not the main one' date=' seriously you need to find space for a second darius in there.[/quote'] Obviously, l didn't like it then. Upon playtest, a second darius is pretty useless. Equeste does the job good. Maybe, after more testing i'll neg an equeste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 BA-DUMP!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted November 26, 2009 Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 You took all my secondary suggestions but not the main one' date=' seriously you need to find space for a second darius in there.[/quote'] Obviously, l didn't like it then. Upon playtest, a second darius is pretty useless. Equeste does the job good. Maybe, after more testing i'll neg an equeste. That's because the deck slows unless you vary one and twos between Equeste and Darious. Never two and two Equeste and Darious. Either two Darius and one Equeste, or two Equeste and one Darius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 Darius evokes bottomless and wrecks the deck. Not to mention, when he's destroyed, the monster is returned to the deck. At least equeste is just a -1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.