Jazin Kay Posted November 26, 2009 Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 In b4 false accusations of being OP'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lily Posted November 26, 2009 Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 Lol, it's bordering the OPed end. Direct Attacks would be hell with this card, and this card can easily take out 1 monster on your opponent's side of the field, so that's an additional thing that contributes to it being slightly OPed. But when your opponent controls more than 1 monster, that is when the trouble starts, so that really knocks it down. Anyway, the art is seriously something. I like it (Where do you get this art anyway? Mind sending me a link via PM or something?). Anyway, finally rating is 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted November 26, 2009 Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 Pretty cool, but I'm a little worried about the 2400 ATK when your opponent has no monsters on the field... though I really like the idea. The only thing I REALLY don't like is the drawing of two cards. I'd make it 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 Lol' date=' it's bordering the OPed end. Direct Attacks would be hell with this card, and this card can easily take out 1 monster on your opponent's side of the field, so that's an additional thing that contributes to it being slightly OPed. But when your opponent controls more than 1 monster, that is when the trouble starts, so that really knocks it down. Anyway, the art is seriously something. I like it (Where do you get this art anyway? Mind sending me a link via PM or something?). Anyway, finally rating is 8.5/10[/quote']Hmm. If you ask nicely, I'll send you the image I uploaded, but my download sources are a closely guarded secret. Pretty cool' date=' but I'm a little worried about the 2400 ATK when your opponent has no monsters on the field... though I really like the idea. The only thing I REALLY don't like is the drawing of two cards. I'd make it 1.[/quote']I only saw it able to remain unbroken if the card I put in my deck is an Omni card, and even then, I might draw the card I returned. I had this issue with Rinyan, that new Lightsworn cat. I returned a Wulf, shuffled, then drew it. I lol'd, but it ruined my hand. Keeping that memory, I made this effect situational on 2 terms. Having an Omni to put in the deck, and having a monster die at ODD's hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 26, 2009 Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 it's not OPed since it loses atk, so 2400 is reasonable for lv4 Personally though I'd still add a drawback in that it can't attack your opponent directly 8.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 Oh, Ragnarok.... what are we gonna do with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 oh! I see a grammars to correct!!!"...and draw 2 cards." should be "...to draw 2 cards." Grammar Nazi moment. Apologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 27, 2009 Report Share Posted November 27, 2009 Oh' date=' Ragnarok.... what are we gonna do with you?[/quote'] I dunno. Use the Omnitrix on him? LOL. Anyways...So, it gains ATK when you get three cards... LIKE THAT! 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.