vyoung44 Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 Please Rate these cards and tell me anything i should fix Desc:This monster cannot declare an attack on DARK attribute monsters.This monster cannot be destroyed by the effects of Spell or Trap cards.Pay 200 Life Points each time this monster declares an attack.If this monster is destroyed in battle shuffle your Deck.Desc:This monster cannot declare an attack on LIGHT attribute monsters.This card cannot be destroyed by the effects of Spell or Trap cards.Pay 200 Life Points each time this monster declares an attack.If this monster is destroyed in battle shuffle your Deck.Desc:Tribute Blackfire Dragon and Whitefire Dragon to Fusion Summon Drakon The Divine Dragon.Desc:(Whitefire Dragon+Blackfire Dragon)This monster is also treated as a Dark attribute monster.Increase the ATK of this monster by 200 for every LIGHT attribute monster on the field.Increase the DEF of this monster by 200 for every DARK attribute monster on the field.This monster can attack twice per Battle Phase.This monster cannot be destroyed by the effects of Spell or Trap cards.This monster can only declare an attack every other turn.Each time this monster declares an attack draw 2 cards from the top of your Deck and discard them. If you say the Ultimate Dragon is OPed first of all think how difficult it is to Summon and the drawbacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 the last one don't make it a DIVINE attribute you can just make it LIGHT, then say it's also treated as a DARK monster it also needs drawbacks, too powerful right now your other 3 are more balanced, but their effects are too bland, add more 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokemon Lord Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 Cool pics.... only I don't really want the last one to be a DIVINE typeAnyways... 8.4/10! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 No DIVINE monsters, the pics (apart from the last one) are overused, the effects for the first two are very bland, the third card has no use, and the fourth card is overpowered. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vyoung44 Posted November 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 the last one don't make it a DIVINE attribute you can just make it LIGHT' date=' then say it's also treated as a DARK monster it also needs drawbacks, too powerful right now your other 3 are more balanced, but their effects are too bland, add more 7/10[/quote']K thanks...i updated it...check out the new cardss... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 for the fusion, it's not Dark attribute monster, it's DARK monster (but you can use the OCG thread to help you on matters like that) with the updates I'll raise the rate to 7.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokemon Lord Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 It's okay.... Dark Attribute is for 5DS.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imma Mario Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Once Ragnarok posts I cant add. But i can help.... Your custom member card, it should Say "Bad Card Maker" not "Bad Ass" because you + bad ass can only appear in one sentence. You are not Bad Ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Dragon Dance's effect implies that the 2 dragons must be on the field as it says to "Tribute" them. Problem is that both dragons are 2-Tributers, making Drakon pointless to summon because the strategy is too slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.