Archer's Assault (New Archtype) completed set(now with a few toned down effects)

[BlackWindDragon]

 

Newly Added:

 

And the sets tail end

[Imperial tech]

I think they are pretty good cards and work together. My favourite probably Artemis and Dark Elves.

_____________________________________________________________

The Best I've Got:

[BlackWindDragon]

thanks, i got more comming soon

[Lazert05]

toooooooooooooooooo sick !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Lord Smeagle]

Most cards I see with new Types are unnecessary. These are very well done. 9/10. I'd like to see more.

[BlackWindDragon]

More cards added

[BlackWindDragon]

bump

[Skyler84]

the photo you use are not bad but please do edit them before uploading into the card maker. it looks ugly and unrealistic with those logos and texts on the picture.

 

Effort: 0/10

Card Rating: 3/10

[BlackWindDragon]

the photo you use are not bad but please do edit them before uploading into the card maker. it looks ugly and unrealistic with those logos and texts on the picture.

 

Effort: 0/10

Card Rating: 3/10

so you giving me a rating based solely on the pictures, not the card effects or anything? thats shallow

[Skyler84]

you can quote my post and yet you miss out something. read carefully before posting a reply. your card rating is below the effort rating. you want a full rating? here it is:

 

Effort: 0/10

Card Effect Rating: 3/10

Card Artwork Rating: 4/10

Card Title Rating: 6/10

 

So have i make myself more clear?

[Skyler84]

you can quote my post and yet you miss out something. read carefully before posting a reply. your card rating is below the effort rating. you want a full rating? here it is:

 

Effort: 0/10

Card Effect Rating: 3/10

Card Artwork Rating: 4/10

Card Title Rating: 6/10

 

So have i make myself more clear?

[BlackWindDragon]

you can quote my post and yet you miss out something. read carefully before posting a reply. your card rating is below the effort rating. you want a full rating? here it is:

 

Effort: 0/10

Card Effect Rating: 3/10

Card Artwork Rating: 4/10

Card Title Rating: 6/10

 

So have i make myself more clear?

personally, i think your a bully, ive seen your ratings of people, and they're harsh, but i have yet to see your own work. the overall rating wasnt that bad, so im not upset, and as for what you think about them, so far your the only one

[Jolta]

I like new Types.

Type is capitalized, and the pics are cool. 9/10

[Skyler84]

if you think softly for your work you can never improve. even for my own work, its 0/10. cause if you were to compare the real cards with yours or mine, its far beyond comparison. so if you think its not that bad, so be it. look around the whole forum. i see card sets that are so godly and flawless with ratings 9/10. worst is some cards with text that is so unoriginal comparing to real cards (not referring to OCG) have ratings 8/10.

 

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-90262.html

this card text is totally unoriginal.

 

as i said, if you create a set of card that is godly and flawless, you might as well create a card level 1 with 10k ATK and DEF, cannot be remove from the field and can attack your opponent life points directly.

 

to me, you are just another show off who thinks highly of yourself. you only accept good comment. by the way, many friends of mine who play Yu-Gi-Oh Card Battle for years rate even lower then mine. they say your cards aren't even realistic at all.

---

just take a look at your point blank shot. i don't wish to explain anymore. and if you don't understand, that is your problem.

 

CREATE SET OF CARDS THAT ARE REASONABLE AND NOT SURE WIN. NO DECK IN THE WORLD ARE SURE WIN.

[BlackWindDragon]

fine mr expert, since you and your friends are obviously experts, then tell me, how are these cards godly and flawless?

[s9526019e]

Dude look if you are pissed at wat Skyler says then stop replying to his post. Besides wat he says is correct. i mean look at it this way; if a card is soo powerful, flawless, and has no weak point at all, wats the point of having a deck or a set o cards in the first place? I mean look at point blank shot : all archer monsters monster you control can attack your opponent directly until the end phase of the turn. I mean look at it. if you control a full set of archers on the field you have practically win the game already. And yes your pic needs to be edited if not it doesn't looks good at all and it will probably ruin the cards.

[BlackWindDragon]

personally, i dont know how to edit it so that the labels and the artist signatures arent there, but in a way, its the only credit some artist get when you create cards. hell non of these images i did, and i admit, i could have done them differently, but i didnt make all the cards at the same time. When i was doing point blank shot, i never originally suspected that the set would grow to be deck sized, but eventually, it just ended up that way. What ill probably do is go back and look at the effects of some of them, edit them, and repost the entire thing. As for me getting on skylar, i was really just trying to defend my work, which i believe i have a right a too. *note, non of this is said in anger*

[s9526019e]

personally' date=' i dont know how to edit it so that the labels and the artist signatures arent there, but in a way, its the only credit some artist get when you create cards. hell non of these images i did, and i admit, i could have done them differently, but i didnt make all the cards at the same time. When i was doing point blank shot, i never originally suspected that the set would grow to be deck sized, but eventually, it just ended up that way. What ill probably do is go back and look at the effects of some of them, edit them, and repost the entire thing. As for me getting on skylar, i was really just trying to defend my work, which i believe i have a right a too. *note, non of this is said in anger*

[/quote']

 

I understand what you are saying that you may or rather will get upset if your work is not exactly well like by other or something like that so no hard feelings but yea i did like your cards though.

[BlackWindDragon]

personally' date=' i dont know how to edit it so that the labels and the artist signatures arent there, but in a way, its the only credit some artist get when you create cards. hell non of these images i did, and i admit, i could have done them differently, but i didnt make all the cards at the same time. When i was doing point blank shot, i never originally suspected that the set would grow to be deck sized, but eventually, it just ended up that way. What ill probably do is go back and look at the effects of some of them, edit them, and repost the entire thing. As for me getting on skylar, i was really just trying to defend my work, which i believe i have a right a too. *note, non of this is said in anger*

[/quote']

 

I understand what you are saying that you may or rather will get upset if your work is not exactly well like by other or something like that so no hard feelings but yea i did like your cards though.

thanks, and ive edited like 5 or 6 of them so they dont seem so overpowered. Like point blank shot has been changed

[BlackWindDragon]

cards with edited effects have offically been posted

[shadowarcdragon]

thank you for settling that stupid fight. geez, i was thinking youd keep this up forever. i like archers so theyre cool.

[BlackWindDragon]

bump

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Before i elaborate more, where are the Archtypes?

[BlackWindDragon]

Before i elaborate more' date=' where are the Archtypes?

[/quote']

 

archtype is really just how i put it, but its really just new type

[madfox95]

Oh my god xD, these cards are just so good as they can be ;D. 10/10 or was it 5/5, I don't remember, atleast maximum points, not less.