I found Atlantis!

[Yankee]

And it's apparently pretty cool

 

[align=center]

 

 

So, I'm back to Yankeefan, and this is my first card with this "new" name. I made many with my old one, so, I thought I should start the tradition again ;)

 

 

Please rate and comment.[/align]

 

Cheers,

Yankeefan

[Sorrow.]

This looks like Effects smashed into one card.

7/10

OCG is good.

[Eury]

TBQH, I liked your old name better.

 

And good card is good. There is nothing wrong with it and it is great Water support. 10/10

[cmc1234]

Nice i really like the card

 

though im not liking the pic that much

 

ocg seems fine and i like the effect

 

9/10

[Yankee]

This looks like Effects smashed into one card.

7/10

OCG is good.

 

Should I post the effect?

 

TBQH' date=' I liked your old name better.

 

And good card is good. There is nothing wrong with it and it is great Water support. 10/10

[/quote']

 

Old name? So you liked me as Yankeefan the whole time? lol

 

Nice i really like the card

 

though im not liking the pic that much

 

ocg seems fine and i like the effect

 

9/10

 

Whats wrong with the pic?

[Sorrow.]

No what I meant was you just put alot of effects on the card..

[.Leo]

I love this card tbh.

 

THis is a great Umi/Water support.

 

I find that everytime i look at one fo these it maeks me want to run an Umi Water Deck.

 

~9.5/10~

[Eury]

TBQH' date=' I liked your old name better.

 

And good card is good. There is nothing wrong with it and it is great Water support. 10/10

[/quote']

 

Old name? So you liked me as Yankeefan the whole time? lol

 

NO U. I liked you as C-2.

[Yankee]

No what I meant was you just put alot of effects on the card..

 

Oh' date=' ok, lol

 

I love this card tbh.

 

THis is a great Umi/Water support.

 

I find that everytime i look at one fo these it maeks me want to run an Umi Water Deck.

 

~9.5/10~

 

You should. There are many good deck..Frogs ftw

 

TBQH' date=' I liked your old name better.

 

And good card is good. There is nothing wrong with it and it is great Water support. 10/10

[/quote']

 

Old name? So you liked me as Yankeefan the whole time? lol

 

NO U. I liked you as C-2.

 

I loved it too, but Yankeefan has always been...Me.

lol

[ragnarok1945]

next time mind writing out the lore? It was a little hard to read there

 

OCG is just fine the way it is, and the effect is well balanced out, so I'll give you the 9.9/10

[Yankee]

So close! XD

Thanks for the post ^_\\\

[nightmare drake]

good card

9.5/10

[Mindscatter]

It is kinda balanced, excepting the defensive effect. Let me explain why:

 

 

1. You activate this card.

2. Your opponent chains Twister.

3. This card gains 1 Spell Counter because Twister is a spell.

4. This card negates it's destruction.

 

So, as you can see from the example above, this card is COMPLETELY indestructible for spells and pretty damn resistant to anything else. Change to "When this card would be destroyed, you can remove 2 Spell Counters from this card instead."

[Mazerrick]

I'm pretty sure that there is 1 OCG error, and it's with the search effect. Otherwise it's a really good card. Good balance, the drawback really evened it out. The "Umi" effect was a good idea too. 9.6/10, btw can you post the effect under it, I could read it but it was kinda hard.

[Metal Skull]

Hmm...there's something wrong with OCG on the search part...

Anyway nice card and a great WATER support^^

9/10

[Mindscatter]

I'm pretty sure that there is 1 OCG error' date=' and it's with the search effect. Otherwise it's a really good card. Good balance, the drawback really evened it out. The "Umi" effect was a good idea too. 9.6/10, btw can you post the effect under it, I could read it but it was kinda hard.

[/quote']

 

The drawback evens nothing. As I said before, this card is almost indestructible, excepting the situation it which you negate it's very activation.

[ragnarok1945]

So close! XD

Thanks for the post ^_\\\

 

sorry, Yankeefan. I almost never give 10/10s because there's no such thing as a perfect card. So next time, just keep this in mind, if you got a 9.9/10, you can essentially treat it as 10/10 from another rater (yes you can still try for a 10/10 from me all you want, I'd enjoy looking at more of your cards)

[Spenstar]

Did you ever actually give a ten here before?

 

And I give this card a 9.7/10. Very Awesome!

[Yankee]

It is kinda balanced' date=' excepting the defensive effect. Let me explain why:

 

 

1. You activate this card.

2. Your opponent chains Twister.

3. This card gains 1 Spell Counter because Twister is a spell.

4. This card negates it's destruction.

 

So, as you can see from the example above, this card is COMPLETELY indestructible for spells and pretty damn resistant to anything else. Change to "When this card would be destroyed, you can remove [b']2[/b] Spell Counters from this card instead."

 

Uh..I copied the OCG from another card. I think you may be mistaken. I THINK the spell counter goes on after the effect resolves, idk

 

So close! XD

Thanks for the post ^_\\\

 

sorry' date=' Yankeefan. I almost never give 10/10s because there's no such thing as a perfect card. So next time, just keep this in mind, if you got a 9.9/10, you can essentially treat it as 10/10 from another rater (yes you can still try for a 10/10 from me all you want, I'd enjoy looking at more of your cards)

[/quote']

 

lol, thanks

 

Did you ever actually give a ten here before?

 

And I give this card a 9.7/10. Very Awesome!

 

Thanks man ^_\\\

[Yankee]

Bump for the win.