Mindscatter Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 You still, did not tell me wtf dark energy is. And gravity is the local time bonding phenomenon circling each baryon. It's the connection between spacetime. And All this would make perfect sense if scientists would truly and unquestioningly discover the graviton boson. Until then, gravity is just what keeps us from falling up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Hey I'm not as think as you dumb I am Jinzo shut your face' date=' please. As for evolution, If we're talking about the evolution of the human race I find it questionable. We may/may not have evolved from Monkeys. It's just obvious but kind of hard to believe. As for evolution in general, I find it fascinating that the animals of nature can adapt and survive in the word, I mean since humans took it over and destroyed half of the animals habitats.[/quote']You aren't Kitty Princess.gtfo (As for your facts, you gotta think more....broad) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Okay, since none of YOU people could tell me, I googled "how evolution is observed" and it said, "evolution is any change in a gene-pool over a period of time." Even Creationists beleive that! I think we should really try to stop the constant fighting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Okay' date=' since none of [b']YOU people could tell me, I googled "how evolution is observed" and it said, "evolution is any change in a gene-pool over a period of time." Even Creationists beleive that! I think we should really try to stop the constant fighting... That guy from the Beatles said it better."Let it Be". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Okay' date=' since none of [b']YOU people could tell me, I googled "how evolution is observed" and it said, "evolution is any change in a gene-pool over a period of time." Even Creationists beleive that! I think we should really try to stop the constant fighting... That guy from the Beatles said it better."Let it Be".If the Beetles said it, then we must obey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Okay' date=' since none of [b']YOU people could tell me, I googled "how evolution is observed" and it said, "evolution is any change in a gene-pool over a period of time." Even Creationists beleive that! I think we should really try to stop the constant fighting... That guy from the Beatles said it better."Let it Be".If the Beetles said it, then we must obey.I thought it was Beatles...you know...beat as in beat in music... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Okay' date=' since none of [b']YOU people could tell me, I googled "how evolution is observed" and it said, "evolution is any change in a gene-pool over a period of time." Even Creationists beleive that! I think we should really try to stop the constant fighting... That guy from the Beatles said it better."Let it Be".If the Beetles said it, then we must obey.I thought it was Beatles...you know...beat as in beat in music...I googled it, it was the Beetles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_BeatlesWikipedia doesn't LiE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 We were monkeys and we started adapting yada yada yada.Black people stopped evolving midway didn't they? Wrong. Both Homo Sapiens and Monkeys came from a common ancestor. We DONT need science lololololololololocaust As for evolution' date=' If we're talking about the evolution of the human race I find it questionable. We may/may not have evolved from Monkeys. It's just obvious but kind of hard to believe.[/quote'] See above comment. Okay' date=' since none of [b']YOU[/b] people could tell me, I googled "how evolution is observed" and it said, "evolution is any change in a gene-pool over a period of time." Even Creationists beleive that! I think we should really try to stop the constant fighting... Actually, Evolution is the change in allele frequency in a population. Anywho... Evolution is certainly real, along with Gravity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. Define the color "red." Oh wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. You're confusing validity with literal wordings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. Define the color "red." Oh wait...Red is one third of the visible light spectrum. Also, it is a sight sensation caused by the appropriate wavelenght inducing oxygen-based chemical reactions in the conic cells on the retina to occur, reactions that are electrically transmitted to the occipital lobe. But that's not the point.Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. You're confusing validity with literal wordings. I don't seem to understand your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. You're confusing validity with literal wordings. I don't seem to understand your argument. Then please learn to understand it, and then come back to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. Define the color "red." Oh wait...Red is one third of the visible light spectrum. Also, it is a sight sensation caused by the appropriate wavelenght inducing oxygen-based chemical reactions on the retina to occur, reactions that are electrically transmitted to the occipital lobe. But that's not the point. Yes, yes it is the point. I am color blind. I cannot see the color red or the color blue. To me, red doesn't exist. Just because I cannot see red, doesn't it make it non existent. Just like with gravity. We have defined gravity. Just because we cannot "see" gravity, does not mean that it doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Ow, now I get it. You're saying that us not being able to explain what gravity is does not mean that gravity doesn't exist. But that's not the case for evolution. Evolution CAN be explained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Damn Gravity and its name.I want to call it God trying to sustain us on the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 To add it my previous statement, I just wanted to through this in there: The majority of you are speaking to us directly, saying things such as "prove that evolution/gravity exists". Just because WE cannot prove it to your eyes right now, there are many people that can out there (Scientists). There is no-one in the world that can prove God exists to our eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Seeing is believing in this world. -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Evolution is certainly real' date=' along with Gravity.[/quote'] As I just explained on the 4th page, Gravity cannot be yet defined, so gtfo. Define the color "red." Oh wait...Red is one third of the visible light spectrum. Also, it is a sight sensation caused by the appropriate wavelenght inducing oxygen-based chemical reactions on the retina to occur, reactions that are electrically transmitted to the occipital lobe. But that's not the point. Yes, yes it is the point. I am color blind. I cannot see the color red or the color blue. To me, red doesn't exist. Just because I cannot see red, doesn't it make it non existent. Just like with gravity. We have defined gravity. Just because we cannot "see" gravity, does not mean that it doesn't exist.Frankly, red DOESN'T exist. It is just an illusion our brain creates. There are just simple, uncomplicated and 100% energy light waves that travel by the speed of light. Light exists for the whole universe. Red exists solely for our damn minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Seeing is believing in this world. -_- Eh, while this point is valid you didn't elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 To add it my previous statement' date=' I just wanted to through this in there: The majority of you are speaking to us directly, saying things such as "prove that evolution/gravity exists". Just because WE cannot prove it to your eyes right now, there are many people that can out there (Scientists). There is no-one in the world that can prove God exists to our eyes.[/quote'] NO SCIENTIST IN THE ENTIRE FREAKIN WORLD CANNOT SAY EXACTLY WHAT GRAVITY IS. I was not requesting for an answer, as there is no answer (yet, maybe it will be discovered in 2100). And God doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Pics or it didn't happen. Eh' date=' while this point is valid you didn't elaborate.[/quote']fix'd In other words...To add it my previous statement' date=' I just wanted to through this in there: The majority of you are speaking to us directly, saying things such as "prove that evolution/gravity exists". Just because WE cannot prove it to your eyes right now, there are many people that can out there (Scientists). There is no-one in the world that can prove God exists to our eyes.[/quote'] NO SCIENTIST IN THE ENTIRE FREAKIN WORLD CANNOT SAY EXACTLY WHAT GRAVITY IS. I was not requesting for an answer, as there is no answer (yet, maybe it will be discovered in 2100). And God doesn't exist. So says the disappointed kid who asked God for a friend and didn't get one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 To add it my previous statement' date=' I just wanted to through this in there: The majority of you are speaking to us directly, saying things such as "prove that evolution/gravity exists". Just because WE cannot prove it to your eyes right now, there are many people that can out there (Scientists). There is no-one in the world that can prove God exists to our eyes.[/quote'] NO SCIENTIST IN THE ENTIRE FREAKIN WORLD CANNOT SAY EXACTLY WHAT GRAVITY IS. I was not requesting for an answer, as there is no answer (yet, maybe it will be discovered in 2100). Erm, do you know this for fact? Go to NASA and ask them what gravity is. >_> Besides, that comment wasn't even directed at you so I was surprised to find such an offensive response to me. Also lol @ 2100, more like 2010 with the way technology is going these days. Anyway, you seem to be pretty smart for someone I haven't seen before. Where have you been? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Dweller: And you REALLY think you're funny saying that, don't you? Brushfire: check wikipedia. It actually says there that gravitons have not been discovered yet, thus being hypothetical. Also, scientists will make a very clear and complete definition of gravity in the future, but they really don't have one now. Also, I was not aggressive, I usually all cap things to highlight them, when I see bolding as being inappropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.