Jump to content

Hey guys, remember Metamorphosis?


Jazin Kay

Recommended Posts

Pic(s) - 8/10 - Suits the card's effect and purpose.

Effect(s) - 8.5/10 - It brings an old card back to life however I think I saw an OCG Error there. Also' date=' it's somewhat OP'd.

Originality - 8.5/10 - No one ever thought of bringing back Metamorphosis =D

 

Overall - 25/30 = 83% = 8.3/10

[/quote']That's a good score and I like how it was tallied.

 

But I don't know how this could be abused to the point of being OPed. Oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pic(s) - 8/10 - Suits the card's effect and purpose.

Effect(s) - 8.5/10 - It brings an old card back to life however I think I saw an OCG Error there. Also' date=' it's somewhat OP'd.

Originality - 8.5/10 - No one ever thought of bringing back Metamorphosis =D

 

Overall - 25/30 = 83% = 8.3/10

[/quote']That's a good score and I like how it was tallied.

 

But I don't know how this could be abused to the point of being OPed. Oh well.

 

That's how I rate all cards =/

 

Anyway, the reason it is somewhat OP'd is because two random monsters to summon 1 Fusion/Synchro Monster seems ridiculous. In addition to that, it has a high DEF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would make it GOOD. But OPed? Still don't see how.

 

I really don't want to go back to thinking YCMers can't tell good from OPed.

 

Explain to me how you can, with pre-existing cards, in logical scenarios, abuse the ability of this card to break and/or devalue a dueling experience with what tricks you can pull off with it. Then I will understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is 6 stars' date=' the DEF is appropriate. It couldn't get out the strongest fusions because they can only be summoned by Fusion Summon. I think its balanced. 8/10

[/quote']

In addition to this, while evaluating my own text for this, I decided to make it higher than 1500 ATK to avoid easier summoning with Mystic Tomato, and higher than 1600 ATK to avoid easier summoning with Chaos-End Master, as well as removing for it's costs to prevent further Graveyard fuel, depending on the deck it's in.

 

Trust me, I thought this through. Sephiran1 gets it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would make it GOOD. But OPed? Still don't see how.

 

I really don't want to go back to thinking YCMers can't tell good from OPed.

 

Explain to me how you can' date=' with pre-existing cards, in logical scenarios, abuse the ability of this card to break and/or devalue a dueling experience with what tricks you can pull off with it. Then I will understand.

[/quote']

 

It's hard to make a scenario about it but imagine this.

 

Duelist 1: Now I have my Stardust Dragon on the field! Turn end.

Duelist 2: I tribute this card to summon my Master (insert complicated word here)! Now, I tribute my Master (hard word) and my (random card) to summon Electronic Ogre 2 (or something) from my Graveyard!

 

That would be complete bullshiz.

 

It is 6 stars' date=' the DEF is appropriate. It couldn't get out the strongest fusions because they can only be summoned by Fusion Summon. I think its balanced. 8/10

[/quote']

 

Yeah, the DEF is appropriate for a six star however, due to it's effect it should be weaker. Be sure to take note of that when rating a card based on it's Level and Stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would make it GOOD. But OPed? Still don't see how.

 

I really don't want to go back to thinking YCMers can't tell good from OPed.

 

Explain to me how you can' date=' with pre-existing cards, in logical scenarios, abuse the ability of this card to break and/or devalue a dueling experience with what tricks you can pull off with it. Then I will understand.

[/quote']

 

It's hard to make a scenario about it but imagine this.

 

Duelist 1: Now I have my Stardust Dragon on the field! Turn end.

Duelist 2: I tribute this card to summon my Master (insert complicated word here)! Now, I tribute my Master (hard word) and my (random card) to summon Electronic Ogre 2 (or something) from my Graveyard!

 

That would be complete bullshiz.

I thought about it.

 

That's what good players call "I can deal with that" or "Hey, your turn man". Not "OMFG BROKEZ".

 

You're silly. Keep in mind, it's from the Graveyard. The way you reacted, I'd think you thought it was straight from the Extra Deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would make it GOOD. But OPed? Still don't see how.

 

I really don't want to go back to thinking YCMers can't tell good from OPed.

 

Explain to me how you can' date=' with pre-existing cards, in logical scenarios, abuse the ability of this card to break and/or devalue a dueling experience with what tricks you can pull off with it. Then I will understand.

[/quote']

 

It's hard to make a scenario about it but imagine this.

 

Duelist 1: Now I have my Stardust Dragon on the field! Turn end.

Duelist 2: I tribute this card to summon my Master (insert complicated word here)! Now, I tribute my Master (hard word) and my (random card) to summon Electronic Ogre 2 (or something) from my Graveyard!

 

That would be complete bullshiz.

I thought about it.

 

That's what good players call "I can deal with that" or "Hey, your turn man". Not "OMFG BROKEZ".

 

You're silly. Keep in mind, it's from the Graveyard. The way you reacted, I'd think you thought it was straight from the Extra Deck.

 

Look, it was just my opinion. I think the card is somewhat OP'd, big deal. There's no need to go around neg repping people based on their opinion -_-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I too think the way the rep system is sustained has been abused into mundane use and may require either removal or complete execution recoding, given the possibility I may actually have some ideas for how to do that.

 

Your opinion on a card that doesn't exist is a clear window into your duelist mind, and I gotta say, I'm shaking my head at what I see. But that's a different argument altogether, that deals with you personally, therefore making it unrelated to this thread or it's contents.

 

Brb, root beer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...