Jump to content

Need a mod or administrator now


valliant12

Recommended Posts

Hi' date=' I'm a mod or something. I'll give you fifty characters to explain why I shouldn't hand you a ban for making this topic. Go.

[/quote']

 

You can't right much in fifty characters.

 

 

Or can you...?

 

No. No, you can't.

 

Evidently, I am impatient.

 

I see that you failed to correct my grammar error.

 

That was a test... and you got a 72. C- is Asian failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi' date=' I'm a mod or something. I'll give you fifty characters to explain why I shouldn't hand you a ban for making this topic. Go.

[/quote']

 

You can't right much in fifty characters.

 

 

Or can you...?

 

No. No, you can't.

 

Evidently, I am impatient.

 

I see that you failed to correct my grammar error.

 

That was a test... and you got a 72. C- is Asian failure.

 

 

Hi' date=' I'm a mod or something. I'll give you fifty characters to explain why I shouldn't hand you a ban for making this topic. Go.

[/quote']

 

You can't right much in fifty characters.

 

 

Or can you...?

 

No. No, you can't.

 

Evidently, I am impatient.

 

I see that you failed to correct my grammar error.

 

That was a test... and you got a 72. A- is Asian failure.

 

Fixed because C- = Death among Asians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While your here Ima ask you a question. Telling other members to die is bannable' date=' might as well ban him now:

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-174239.html

[/quote']

 

We have a specific rule about telling other members to die? It's clearly against the Jack Witt Clause and qualifies as Flaming under Offensive Orders, so I gave him a three-day ban.

 

Hi' date=' I'm a mod or something. I'll give you fifty characters to explain why I shouldn't hand you a ban for making this topic. Go.

[/quote']

 

You can't right much in fifty characters.

 

 

Or can you...?

 

No. No, you can't.

 

Evidently, I am impatient.

 

I see that you failed to correct my grammar error.

 

That was a test... and you got a 72. C- is Asian failure.

 

You expect me to correct the grammar of everyone I see on YCM? You do know what this site is like, right?

 

Also, B+ is failure in my book. Fortunately, I don't fail. Except in Spanish. Stupid Spanish class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While your here Ima ask you a question. Telling other members to die is bannable' date=' might as well ban him now:

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-174239.html

[/quote']

 

We have a specific rule about telling other members to die? It's clearly against the Jack Witt Clause and qualifies as Flaming under Offensive Orders, so I gave him a three-day ban.

 

I'd like to point out that the Jack Witt Clause doesn't apply in CC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While your here Ima ask you a question. Telling other members to die is bannable' date=' might as well ban him now:

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-174239.html

[/quote']

 

We have a specific rule about telling other members to die? It's clearly against the Jack Witt Clause and qualifies as Flaming under Offensive Orders, so I gave him a three-day ban.

 

I'd like to point out that the Jack Witt Clause doesn't apply in CC.

 

Surely CC has its own version of the Jack Witt Clause? At any rate, the Jack Witt Clause is always just a subcategory of Flaming, so it hardly matters, since Flaming is a sitewide rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While your here Ima ask you a question. Telling other members to die is bannable' date=' might as well ban him now:

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-174239.html

[/quote']

 

We have a specific rule about telling other members to die? It's clearly against the Jack Witt Clause and qualifies as Flaming under Offensive Orders, so I gave him a three-day ban.

 

I'd like to point out that the Jack Witt Clause doesn't apply in CC.

 

Surely CC has its own version of the Jack Witt Clause? At any rate, the Jack Witt Clause is always just a subcategory of Flaming, so it hardly matters, since Flaming is a sitewide rule.

 

I'm sure sitewide isn't a word.

Anyway, I don't think it does. Icy's not the person to agree with flaming of any kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While your here Ima ask you a question. Telling other members to die is bannable' date=' might as well ban him now:

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-174239.html

[/quote']

 

We have a specific rule about telling other members to die? It's clearly against the Jack Witt Clause and qualifies as Flaming under Offensive Orders, so I gave him a three-day ban.

 

I'd like to point out that the Jack Witt Clause doesn't apply in CC.

 

Surely CC has its own version of the Jack Witt Clause? At any rate, the Jack Witt Clause is always just a subcategory of Flaming, so it hardly matters, since Flaming is a sitewide rule.

 

I'm sure sitewide isn't a word.

Anyway, I don't think it does. Icy's not the person to agree with flaming of any kind.

 

I don't see why it shouldn't be a word. We have "citywide" and "nationwide" and so on as words, so regardless of what Firefox's built-in spell-checker says, I don't see any problem with the internet analogue "sitewide" being a word.

 

If it doesn't have such a rule, then the standard Flaming rule still applies, so the ban stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While your here Ima ask you a question. Telling other members to die is bannable' date=' might as well ban him now:

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-174239.html

[/quote']

 

We have a specific rule about telling other members to die? It's clearly against the Jack Witt Clause and qualifies as Flaming under Offensive Orders, so I gave him a three-day ban.

 

I'd like to point out that the Jack Witt Clause doesn't apply in CC.

 

Surely CC has its own version of the Jack Witt Clause? At any rate, the Jack Witt Clause is always just a subcategory of Flaming, so it hardly matters, since Flaming is a sitewide rule.

 

I'm sure sitewide isn't a word.

Anyway, I don't think it does. Icy's not the person to agree with flaming of any kind.

 

I don't see why it shouldn't be a word. We have "citywide" and "nationwide" and so on as words, so regardless of what Firefox's built-in spell-checker says, I don't see any problem with the internet analogue "sitewide" being a word.

 

If it doesn't have such a rule, then the standard Flaming rule still applies, so the ban stands.

 

Lol Firefox's built in spell-checker.

 

And I wasn't trying to defend him, I agree with the banning. I was just throwing my statement in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9. The Jack Witt Clause

 

All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that' date=' when you post your deck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed.

[/quote']

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly is the Jack Witt Clause?

 

Google isn't my friend in this instance.

 

A Your Deck rule that basically says "No responding to constructive criticism with flames". Named for a chap named Jack Witt who did just that' date=' and promptly found that his account's name was written in [s']strikethrough[/s].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...