Jump to content

Archlord Venas

Plaguespreader Zombie

By Plaguespreader Zombie
in Realistic Cards

Recommended Posts

Plaguespreader Zombie Newbie

Plaguespreader Zombie

Posted
Posted

[align=center]159221b.jpg

 

Archlord Venas

LIGHT

*********

Angel / Effect

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by Tributing a face-up "Archlord" monster you control while "The Sanctuary in the Sky" is face-up on the field. Once per turn, if your Life Points are lower than your Opponents, you can have this card lose 500 ATK to Special Summon 1 Angel-Type Monster in your Graveyard in face-up Defense Position. It's effects are negated, and it cannot change it's Battle Position until the End Phase of your next turn. If this card would be destroyed by a Card Effect, you can destroy 1 face-up Angel-Type Monster you control instead. When this card is destroyed, destroy all cards on the field Special Summoned by this card's effect.

3700 / 2100

 

Image Credit: Father Wolf

 

Angel's now have a better Boss Monster.[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bengal Newbie

Bengal

Posted
Posted

Not bad, the image is alright and the OCG is solid.

 

The card is relatively balanced, the ATK is high, but I suppose since it would be after an Archlord it fits. Even without using the SS effect, it can still be an effective beatstick especially because of the self preservation effect.

 

I would have liked to see Fairy-Type being used to make it more versatile even though I know that Angel is the Japanese version.

 

The only thing I would suggest adding is a Level limit to the Angel-Type that is Special Summoned.

 

9/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Excallibur Newbie

Excallibur

Posted
Posted

http://images.yugiohcardmaker.net/411727/239679610.jpg

 

If you have exactly 4 Fairy-Type monsters in your Graveyard, you can Special Summon this card from your hand. When you do, add 1 Fairy-Type monster from your Graveyard to your hand. Neither player can Special Summon monsters. If this face-up card would be sent from the field to the Graveyard, it returns to the top of the owner's Deck, instead.

 

Yea, Fairys have no Awesome 'Boss' monsters. Anyways it seems okay I like it a lot.

 

8.4/10

 

NOTE: I do not own this card, this card was taken directly from Pojo.com Complete credit goes to Kazuki Takahashi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Plaguespreader Zombie Newbie

Plaguespreader Zombie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i did point out an error. error=OCG isnt that great. the phrase "would be" has never been on a yugioh card' date='not @ least the one's i have seen anyway. and the wording on the lose 500 ATK to special summon is weird. so basically only thing i have against the card is the OCG.

[/quote']

 

MagicalCitadelofEndymionSDSC-EN-C-1E.jpg

 

I don't see what you mean by the wording is weird on the lose 500 ATK.

 

And no. Saying OCG is bad is not pointing out errors, so stfu.

 

http://images.yugiohcardmaker.net/411727/239679610.jpg

 

If you have exactly 4 Fairy-Type monsters in your Graveyard' date=' you can Special Summon this card from your hand. When you do, add 1 Fairy-Type monster from your Graveyard to your hand. Neither player can Special Summon monsters. If this face-up card would be sent from the field to the Graveyard, it returns to the top of the owner's Deck, instead.

 

Yea, Fairys have no Awesome 'Boss' monsters. Anyways it seems okay I like it a lot.

 

8.4/10

 

NOTE: I do not own this card, this card was taken directly from Pojo.com Complete credit goes to Kazuki Takahashi.

[/quote']

 

Meh. Archlord Kristya isn't that great for Fairies. Fairies need at least a bit of Special Summoning :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeathstickeR Newbie

DeathstickeR

Posted
Posted

1st OCG problem:"if your Life Points are lower than your Opponents, YOU CAN HAVE THIS CARD LOSE 500 ATK TO Special Summon 1 Angel-Type Monster in your Graveyard in face-up Defense Position"

 

after the comma is where the OCG gets bad. instead of "you can have this card lose 500 ATK to special summon 1 angel-type monster from your grave yard in face-up defense position" it should say "once per turn,while your life points are less than your opponent's,YOU MAY DECREASE THE ATK OF THIS CARD BY 500 to special summon 1 angel-type monster from your graveyard in face-up defense position."

 

 

changes and problems are in caps.

 

 

2nd OCG problem: "if this card would be destroyed by a Card Effect, you can destroy 1 face-up Angel-Type Monster you control instead"

 

fix: "You may negate the activation of a card effect that destroys this card by destroying 1 fae-up angel-type monster you control."

 

OCG is an error so how about you stfu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Plaguespreader Zombie Newbie

Plaguespreader Zombie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

1st OCG problem:"if your Life Points are lower than your Opponents' date=' YOU CAN HAVE THIS CARD LOSE 500 ATK TO Special Summon 1 Angel-Type Monster in your Graveyard in face-up Defense Position"

 

after the comma is where the OCG gets bad. instead of "you can have this card lose 500 ATK to special summon 1 angel-type monster from your grave yard in face-up defense position" it should say "once per turn,while your life points are less than your opponent's,YOU MAY DECREASE THE ATK OF THIS CARD BY 500 to special summon 1 angel-type monster from your graveyard in face-up defense position."

 

 

changes and problems are in caps.

 

 

2nd OCG problem: "if this card would be destroyed by a Card Effect, you can destroy 1 face-up Angel-Type Monster you control instead"

 

fix: "You may negate the activation of a card effect that destroys this card by destroying 1 fae-up angel-type monster you control."

 

OCG is an error so how about you stfu?

[/quote']

 

[align=center]DarkEndDragonSJCS-EN-UR-LE.pngMorphtronicSlingenCRMS-EN-C-1E.png

 

I have Yugioh Cards. Your Argument is invalid.[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Encalade Shinamisu Newbie

Encalade Shinamisu

Posted
Posted

i have been collecting yugioh since i was 9. im currently 16. therefore my argument is valid.

the person who typed the writing for "Dark End Dragon" screwed up. and teh other is just fine. it all depends on the context.

 

Kanye West: Ayo I'm real happy for you and all, but plenty of other people have played yugioh longer than you have.

 

Anyways, they didn't screw it up, it just so happens that that's the way they typed it up. It's their game. Regardless, there are other cards like so, and there are points at which the company says: Let's shorten this effect by decreasing the amount of word usage in it. That way it'll be easier to read and less ink will be used.

 

The OCG changes however the company wants it to, that's just Konami for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Plaguespreader Zombie Newbie

Plaguespreader Zombie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i have been collecting yugioh since i was 9. im currently 16. therefore my argument is valid.

the person who typed the writing for "Dark End Dragon" screwed up. and teh other is just fine. it all depends on the context.

 

I've been playing since I was liek 5. I am currently 12. You're argument is invalid.

 

Oh btw:

 

SplendidVenusTDGS-EN-ScR-1E.pngArcanaForceIV-TheEmperorLODT-EN-C-1E.pngAcidicDownpourPTDN-EN-C-1E.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DMZ Newbie

DMZ

Posted
Posted

@Deathsticker

Really, you should stop arguing now, before you get even more crushed.

Those arguments are valid, and after all, these cards and the "Correct OCG" are based on the real cards by Konami. So Good luck trying to convince Konami that their OCG is wrong.

 

@ card

It is balanced out, although I wonder if the Tributed Archlord needs a tribute to be Summoned himself. If so, then it's in balance.

 

8/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Plaguespreader Zombie Newbie

Plaguespreader Zombie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

@Deathsticker

Really' date=' you should stop arguing now, before you get even more crushed.

Those arguments are valid, and after all, these cards and the "Correct OCG" are based on the real cards by Konami. So Good luck trying to convince Konami that their OCG is wrong.

 

@ card

It is balanced out, although I wonder if the Tributed Archlord needs a tribute to be Summoned himself. If so, then it's in balance.

 

8/10

[/quote']

 

[align=center]ArchlordZeratoAST-NA-UR-1E.pngArchlordKristyaSOVR-EN-ScR-1E.jpg

 

:3

 

Thanks for the Rate[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeathstickeR Newbie

DeathstickeR

Posted
Posted

well i do know one thing,konami must be fricken idiots if they cant even type with proper grammar. and that card iis the ONLY card i have ever seen in my life that said "can lose 500 ATK and DEF" whoever typed that was a retard. oh and i apolagize for having a better understanding of the english language than most people on here.

splendid venus and the emporer are just fine. "can" should be placed in them and since it isn't it's just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Plaguespreader Zombie Newbie

Plaguespreader Zombie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

well i do know one thing' date='konami must be fricken idiots if they cant even type with proper grammar. and that card iis the ONLY card i have ever seen in my life that said "can lose 500 ATK and DEF" whoever typed that was a retard. oh and i apolagize for having a better understanding of the english language than most people on here.[hr']

splendid venus and the emporer are just fine. "can" should be placed in them and since it isn't it's just fine.

 

You're complaining about Konami's grammar when you're not capitalizing 'I', spelling 'apologize' and 'is' wrong, not capitalizing Proper Nouns nor the beginnings of your sentences.

 

lol

 

Oh and, like DMZ said. Go tell Konami their OCG is wrong. Because what Konami says goes.

 

This is an unwinable battle, you might as well stop =3

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DMZ Newbie

DMZ

Posted
Posted

well i do know one thing' date='konami must be fricken idiots if they cant even type with proper grammar. and that card iis the ONLY card i have ever seen in my life that said "can lose 500 ATK and DEF" whoever typed that was a retard. oh and i apolagize for having a better understanding of the english language than most people on here.[hr']

splendid venus and the emporer are just fine. "can" should be placed in them and since it isn't it's just fine.

 

**member telling an elite member that he is wrong.....

I don't think that Akira got his post count by making so many grammar errors.And look at his cards. 404 vs 21....Rings a bell?

And yes, "lose" may not be the best way to word it, but it's short and everybody understands it. And btw, your attempt to convince us that you are a master grade english academic has horribly failed. Get the dictionary and start learning english.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...