The Examination of Political Aftershock

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

I think that in our society we'd do well to examine it harder than we seem to be doing.

 

For example, each time the US Government has innocent Muslims arrested in airports, we need to be aware that this can only be done so many times before certain people get aggravated, certain conclusions are jumped to, and certain judgments are later raised as a result.

 

When the Chinese Government massacres protesters in Tiananmen Square, they need to examine that this will raise certain questions about their legitimacy as a proper government.

 

In the same light, when major non-oppressive influential figures are removed from any body of people, one must examine that the body of people will be confused and the more hesitant will simply begin to start questioning those who removed said influential figure.

 

The less hesitant will jump to conclusions. We must examine that many aren't so hesitant to react when statements are made.

 

We must examine political aftershock. We must examine the consequences and chaos certain decisions will make down the road. We must examine that pawns being sent in by larger pieces to their doom to convenience the root of those pieces, the other pawns will be angered and confused.

 

obtw, this thread is about Riku.

[Dweller of Parables]

I don't know Riku.

Riku is thus a noob.

 

Thread failed.

[Mehmani]

In the same light' date=' when major non-oppressive influential figures are removed from any body of people, one must examine that the body of people will be confused and the more hesitant will simply begin to start questioning those who removed said influential figure.

 

The less hesitant will jump to conclusions. We must examine that many aren't so hesitant to react when statements are made.

[/quote']

 

You mean like Draco?

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

I don't know Riku.

Riku is thus a noob.

 

Thread failed.

 

Yes you do.

 

THUS gtfo noob.

 

In the same light' date=' when major non-oppressive influential figures are removed from any body of people, one must examine that the body of people will be confused and the more hesitant will simply begin to start questioning those who removed said influential figure.

 

The less hesitant will jump to conclusions. We must examine that many aren't so hesitant to react when statements are made.

[/quote']

 

You mean like Draco?

 

NO DRACO DOES NOT COUNT

[Crimson General]

I agree, alot of uneeded conflict has been started by people making blind descisions without thinking of any consequences whatsoever.

 

That's generally why I don't give people what they want when they make accusations about me and so-forth. I was accused of stalking someone I didn't know for example. Rather than give in, and join the conflict, I simply said I don't know that person, I have never stalked ANYone in any regard, and I asked them to give me proof. Never heard from 'em again.