Trap card

[Glarrion]

[EHN.]

Not too bad.....

 

Needs some serious

OCG(Official Card Grammar) fixes.

Pics ok.

Maybe Counter-trap?

 

6.458467856796/10

[Glarrion]

Alright, I haven't actually had any involvement in Yu-Gi-Oh for 2-3 years now, so all my old cards I still have that I'm using for reference are at least that old.

[EHN.]

Still its a great card!

[DMZ]

"You can only activate this card when a face-up Attack Position monster you control is the target of an attack. The attack is switched as if it was during your Battle Phase until the End Phase of this turn. Battle Damage is calculated accordingly."

 

This is a hard one lol

The effect is unique, so I might not be on point in rewriting the OCG(If there is any for this).

 

7/10

[賢狼ホロ]

I do not understand this card... @_@

 

Player 1's Blue Eyes White Dragon attacks Player 2's Dark Magician

Player 2's Dark Magician is destroyed and Player 2 takes 500 damage

 

- or -

 

Player 1's Blue Eyes White Dragon attacks Player 2's Dark Magician

Player 2 activates Immovable Object

Player 2's Dark Magician attacks Player 1's Blue Eyes White Dragon instead

Player 2's Dark Magician is destroyed and Player 2 takes 500 damage

 

What am I missing out on? Do you mean "ATK" when you write "Attack"? o_o

[DMZ]

I do not understand this card... @_@

 

Player 1's Blue Eyes White Dragon attacks Player 2's Dark Magician

Player 2's Dark Magician is destroyed and Player 2 takes 500 damage

 

- or -

 

Player 1's Blue Eyes White Dragon attacks Player 2's Dark Magician

Player 2 activates Immovable Object

Player 2's Dark Magician attacks Player 1's Blue Eyes White Dragon instead

Player 2's Dark Magician is destroyedReally?? and Player 2 takes 500 damage

In that case I would guess it can be chained with a stat-boosting card. Also' date=' this would be handy against cards that destroy every monster they attack, regardless of ATK/DEF. The reverse attack could destroy the monster and keep the card intact.[/b']

 

What am I missing out on? Do you mean "ATK" when you write "Attack"? o_o

[EHN.]

"You can only activate this card when a face-up Attack Position monster you control is the target of an attack. The attack is switched as if it was during your Battle Phase until the End Phase of this turn. Battle Damage is calculated accordingly."

 

This is a hard one lol

The effect is unique' date=' so I might not be on point in rewriting the OCG(If there is any for this).

 

7/10

[/quote']

OCG fix is completely wrong.

[DMZ]

"You can only activate this card when a face-up Attack Position monster you control is the target of an attack. The attack is switched as if it was during your Battle Phase until the End Phase of this turn. Battle Damage is calculated accordingly."

 

This is a hard one lol

The effect is unique' date=' so I might not be on point in rewriting the OCG(If there is any for this).

 

7/10

[/quote']

OCG fix is completely wrong.

Well, I did say i might no be on point. To be honest, I don't know how to rewrite this properly, I just tried. Also, if you are saying "Wrong", then please show me "Right"

[Biscuit680]

10/10

[賢狼ホロ]

But suppose you chain "Rush Recklessly" which is a stat-boosting card to the Attack.

The Dark Magician will gain 700 ATK and have 3200 total. It does not really matter if Blue Eyes White Dragon or Dark Magicians attacks. Blue Eyes White Dragon Would be destroyed and its owner will lose 200 Life Points. So it is completely useless in that situation.

 

What you said after that though, is true.

But, yes there is a but, I am not to familiar with the game yet as I started recently, but the only battle effects as you mentioned I have encountered yet is the ones of D.D. Assailant, D.D. Warrior and D.D. Warrior Lady. All of them activate (or can be activated) regardless if they attack or is attack (in D.D. Assailants case as long it is destroyed). So, with these cards this card is useless as well.

 

What I can imagine is Rush Recklessly + Immovable Object for those level-cards that needs to destroy monsters by battle. But still, I find it hardly interesting.

 

More interesting would be;

"Activate when your opponent declares an attack targeting your (face-up) Defence Position monster. Switch the attacking monster to Defence Position and the attack target monster to Attack Position. Attack with the monster the opponents monster that activated this effect."

[ragnarok1945]

"You can only activate this card when a face-up Attack Position monster you control is the target of an attack. The attack is switched as if it was during your Battle Phase until the End Phase of this turn. Battle Damage is calculated accordingly."

 

This is a hard one lol

The effect is unique' date=' so I might not be on point in rewriting the OCG(If there is any for this).

 

7/10

[/quote']

 

Actually I think the 1st sentence should be You can only activate this card when a face-up Attack Position monster you control is attacked.

 

quite an interesting effect though, I'll rate it 7.7/10

[DMZ]

"You can only activate this card when a face-up Attack Position monster you control is the target of an attack. The attack is switched as if it was during your Battle Phase until the End Phase of this turn. Battle Damage is calculated accordingly."

 

This is a hard one lol

The effect is unique' date=' so I might not be on point in rewriting the OCG(If there is any for this).

 

7/10

[/quote']

 

Actually I think the 1st sentence should be You can only activate this card when a face-up Attack Position monster you control is attacked.

 

quite an interesting effect though, I'll rate it 7.7/10

Both work. The new cards also have "target of...". I like to use that form because it is more old-fashioned Yugioh