Aero~ Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 This set is based off a "Dream" signerature move called "Possesing". If you would like to know how to make subtypes, just ask.Special thanks to Eurynome for telling me how to post these.Spells[spoiler=Field of dreams] -[spoiler=Dreamy Sky]This card is also treated as an equip spell card and is to be equiped to "Field of Dreams". "Field of Dreams"'s name becomes "Dreamy Sky" as long as this card is equiped to it. Once per turn, when a dream monster you control posseses, you can special summon one level 3 or less dream monster from your deck. It's effect(s) are negated. -Monsters-[spoiler=Dream Spirit]Once per turn, by paying 500 life points, you can special summon one level 2 or less monster from your opponent's graveyard. It's effect(s) are negated. This is treated as possesing. -[spoiler=Dark Dreamer]Once per turn, you can pay 1000 life points to possess one level 3 or less monster in your opponent's graveyard. When this card succesfully possesses, you can pay 1500 more life points to Dream Eat one monster your opponent controls (1500 ATK points). -[spoiler=Dream Warrior]When this card is succesfullt normal summoned, you an pay 1500 to Dream Eat one of your opponent's monsters (1000 ATK, 1000 DEF). When this card is destroyed and sent to the graveyard, add one level 4 or less Dream monster from your deck to your hand. -Glossary-Possess: Special summoning a monster from your opponent's graveyard by the effect of a Dream monster. The summoned monster(s) effect(s) are negated. This ussually results in paying life points as a cost. (This starts a chain)--Dream Eat: This is another move that can only be activated by the effect of a dream monster. When a monster Dream Eats, You pay a certain amount of life points to decrease the attack of an opponent's monster. The dream monster is not destroyed. Somewhat like the effect of Rocket Warrior.--PLEASE RATE AND COMMENT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 both pics too blurry you also misspelled their in the first card Dream is not a real type either 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Thanx for rating. I know it's not a real type, I just thought it would be fun to make a dream subtype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 so this means we'll be seeing more of such cards here soon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 yup. OOC: For some reason, you posted that and the picture beside the thread name didn't come up blue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Wright~ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 If you want better pictures, look at the links in my sig. All of those pictures are wonderful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 If you want better pictures' date=' look at the links in my sig. All of those pictures are wonderful.[/quote']I'll take that as a "The pics suck. Bad." Thanx, I used the photo bucket link. Both pics actually came from deviant art. Dreamy Sky ADDED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 what's noma? There's some minor capitalization errors in the text as well 7.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 lol, sorry. I meant to say name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 2 NEW CARDS ADDED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I'm not sure if possesion is official OCG. To use it properly, I think you'd have to give the def of possesion/dream eat on every card that does it. Similar to my Digitech set how they all have in them "Digitech Virus cannot be Summoned or played." You can't imply effects. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMZ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Damn, ye stole ma idea XDAnyways, pics are blurrrrrry as hell.(Oh wait, hell is crystal clear) 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I'm not sure if possesion is official OCG. To use it properly' date=' I think you'd have to give the def of possesion/dream eat on every card that does it. Similar to my Digitech set how they all have in them "Digitech Virus cannot be Summoned or played." You can't imply effects. 8/10[/quote']Well, I was thinking like how there's chaining, every card doesn't explain chaining if it can be chained to. And summon. Get what I mean? Darn' date=' ye stole ma idea XDAnyways, pics are blury as heck.(Oh wait, heck is crystal clear)7/10[/quote']Actually, I didn't see you had a dream card thread until I posted the 5th card. We could work together on 1 dream project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMZ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I finished my mini-deck(Dreamer Archetype(30/30)) yesterday. So that's gone XDWe could work on a Psychic minideck(bare-bone deck). Dreamers are psychic :)Hint: You can check my thread to see how I created the Dream World. Although my deck heavily focuses on integration rather than on being a deck on it's own. And man.....you nEED better pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zektor Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 i like them 8/10 a few OCG errors and other minors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Well, chaining is in the rule book, possesion isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I know. That's what I'm trying to make it like. Like, how I put glossary. If this was a real move, "Possessing" would be in the glossary. Get it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMZ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Who wants to keep a dictionary for each of these cards? Guys? Girls?*Looks around* Nobody? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Well in the back of the rule book, there's a glossary. If these were real, then the effects like Possessing wouldn't be complained about in this way, would they? Like when Sychros were introduced. People didn't complain saying it didn't make sense to the previous rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMZ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I hope you understood the sarcasm, but yea, the officials have a glossary. What I mean is that if we get more of these "new" effects and glossaries, then we might just as well get a dictionary while playing. Synchor's are another thing. It's basically raped fusion and it is intuitive to do, so nobody complained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 lol i get it- but do u get wut i mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMZ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 That point was made clear :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 OK, good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lightning Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 All pictures are blurry.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.