Jolta Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Since it is, she acts differently from me. She hates Jolteon and Vanillas. Hahaha. [align=center]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. It can only be Special Summoned if it is the only card in your hand. This card does piercing damage. Once per turn, you may toss a coin. If heads, you may destroy 1 face-up Thunder-Type monster on the field without inflicting battle damage to gain Life Points equal to that monster's ATK. If tails, destroy all face-up Normal Monsters on the field.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexis Rhodes Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Ok picture and effect but i dont think there any many thunder monsters 7/10:) EDIT : So your name is Alexis ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Ok picture and effect but i dont think there any many thunder monsters 7/10:) EDIT : So your name is Alexis ? Yeah yeah, I guess so, but not many call me that. This focuses on the underused guys, you'll never know when underused nonmeta dudes arrive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 8.2/10 so Jolt your saying your a girl? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Your name is Alexis? That explains so much, yet so little. *Shot* I like the art. I think in the new OCG "May" is "Can" now or something. Interesting effect on nuking Normal Monsters and Thunder monsters. Can't tell if it's overpowered or underpowered...I'll just put balanced for now. Tis Nais. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 There are a few OCG errors, which I will fix as the last thing. It's ok balanced, nothing more to say really. Pic is ok too, but it's squashed. This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned if it is the only card in your hand. This card inflicts Piercing Damage. Once per turn, you can toss a coin. If heads, you can destroy 1 face-up Thunder-Type monster on the field without inflicting battle damage and gain Life Points equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. If tails, destroy all face-up Normal Monsters on the field. As for the bit I striked out, of course it doesn't inflict battle damage, it isn't destroyed by battle. That one thing drags it down quite a bit, so 7.3/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 8.2/10 so Jolt your saying your a girl?False. I iz no girl. Your name is Alexis? That explains so much' date=' yet so little. *Shot* I like the art. I think in the new OCG "May" is "Can" now or something. Interesting effect on nuking Normal Monsters and Thunder monsters. Can't tell if it's overpowered or underpowered...I'll just put balanced for now. Tis Nais. 8/10[/quote']Ow. Woah, New and old. I could make this part of an Anti-nonmeta deck despite the fact that I like Vanillas. Thanks dudes. Pic seems squashed? Crop needed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zektor Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 9/10 ok ocg any way if you arent a girl and your name is alexis that doesnt make sene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 any way if you arent a girl and your name is alexis that doesnt make sene Talk about that in General. Sixela is my only anti-Vanilla here. Thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Riku~ Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Okay Alexis, good card 9/10.But seriously, it's a little weird for a boy to have a name like Alexis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gustavosuarez Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 its not weird. i know some guys with that name. its commmon in my country:) well, change the things, the card are very good, the OCG is fine and is very usefull for all the new decks with all of that funking Geminis that are very hard to killing. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Riku~ Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Yeah, I guess... I mean, not like Jolta's any worse for having a name that usually belongs to girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 the heads effect is very situational, not that many people use Thunder Decks but the atk is way too low. You didn't give it any atk boosting ability, so 1400 is too weak for lv6. Make it 2300ish instead 8.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 its not weird. i know some guys with that name. its commmon in my country:) well' date=' change the things, the card are very good, the OCG is fine and is very usefull for all the new decks with all of that f***ing Geminis that are very hard to killing. 9/10[/quote']Harhar. You found it out.Woah, I expected it to be Anti-Nonmeta and it kills Geminis. Hehe. the heads effect is very situational' date=' not that many people use Thunder Decks but the atk is way too low. You didn't give it any atk boosting ability, so 1400 is too weak for lv6. Make it 2300ish instead 8.9/10[/quote'] That's teh whole point. You'll never know whenb they pop out of the blue. Thanks guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 1. It is Anti-Nonmeta, because if you pay attention, who actually runs Geminis?2. To UP'd for a Lvl. 6. You must give it at least 1900 ATK, as with its Effect, will make it more reasonable.3. It's not "Piercing Damage," as you put. It is "When this card attacks with an ATK that is greater than the DEF of the attack target, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points." That is the up-to-meta version, or close enough, of "Piercing Damage."4. "Without Inflicting Battle Damage" isn't necessary.5. In Response to..... That's teh whole point. You'll never know whenb they pop out of the blue. Thanks guys. They never really pop out of the blue. How often do you see them? Never, so the use of this card is beyond necessity, and therefore would never find play in any Meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Oh great. So you mean we can't be stealthy and destroy all the nonmeta ones just in case they appear? Rarely appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Actually, that is exactly what I'm saying. O.oSurprised someone actually understands what I'm saying, instead of arguing about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Actually' date=' that is exactly what I'm saying. O.oSurprised someone actually understands what I'm saying, instead of arguing about it.[/quote'] In the meantime, I better check LolWiki for field Nukers. they're kinda better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 They're really the only things that work in Meta nowadayz. Ugh..... >: ( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokemon Lord Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 WEQ! 1400 atk for a 6 star??! Simply NOT cool man (-1)Of course you don't inflict damage using destruction effect ( - 0.2 )Wew Alexis, still have a good rating though 8.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donquixote Doflamingo Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 good idea7/10alexis, isn't that a unisex name? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 good idea7/10alexis' date=' isn't that a unisex name?[/quote'] Yes. It literally is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.