Natedog2001 Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 This Is My Dragons Den Deck Please Comment My Deck Contains: 21x 1-4 Star Monsters8x 5-6 Star Monsters2x 7-8 Star Monsters1x Ritual Monster2x Fusion Monsters10x Spells4x Traps48x Cards Total Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannystfu9898 Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 well you did a pretty good job (a lot better than anything i do) but some of the pictures were blurry bu t you shouldn't worry. 7 out of 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackpantherb Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 Great cards some pics were blurry and some types do not exist eg Wizard should be Spellcaster but overall it was good8 out of 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dim Sim Posted December 14, 2007 Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 Nice Deck 8 out of 10 ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natedog2001 Posted December 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 Great cards some pics were blurry and some types do not exist eg Wizard should be Spellcaster but overall it was good8 out of 10 Hey Thanks For The Comment And Whats The Problem With Inventing Some New Types Seeing As We Are Making New Cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yusei Fudou Posted December 14, 2007 Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 Bad Card Grammar, and don't capitalize every word you say, it's not right. Just use the right capitalization. Also, Recruit Lv5 has an effect and it's Normal... WTF? Nightmare Dragon's overpowered, and Angel, convert it to Fairy. In the Japanese Original Card Game, Fairy's named Angel, so don't invent a new type called 'Angel', just use Fairy. And Demon -> Fiend, and etc. And Wizard? Spellcaster, not Wizard. Do not invent such foolish types that are known... example: Dragon, someone makes a Dragon-Warrior sub-type is foolish, same as your "Wizard", "Demon", "Ghost" and "Angel". Change Wizard to Spellcaster, Demon to Fiend, Ghost to Fiend and Angel to Fairy. 5/10 I know you can improve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natedog2001 Posted December 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 Bad Card Grammar' date=' and don't capitalize every word you say, it's not right. Just use the right capitalization. Also, Recruit Lv5 has an effect and it's Normal... WTF? Nightmare Dragon's overpowered, and Angel, convert it to Fairy. In the Japanese Original Card Game, Fairy's named Angel, so don't invent a new type called 'Angel', just use Fairy. And Demon -> Fiend, and etc. And Wizard? Spellcaster, not Wizard. Do not invent such foolish types that are known... example: Dragon, someone makes a Dragon-Warrior sub-type is foolish, same as your "Wizard", "Demon", "Ghost" and "Angel". Change Wizard to Spellcaster, Demon to Fiend, Ghost to Fiend and Angel to Fairy. 5/10 I know you can improve.[/quote'] Hey I Hear What You Are Saying. But Seeing As We ARE!! Creating Our Own Cards, Cant We Create Our Own Sub-Attributes As Well. Honestly What Is The Harm In It P.S. If You Have A Problem With My Cards Dont Comment On Them.P.P.S. I Cant Handle Un Capitalized Things It Is Just By Force Of Habit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yusei Fudou Posted December 14, 2007 Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 ^I don't mean stupid uncapitalized things like: "when this card is summoned u win hahahaha!!!", no, I mean, capitalize correctly. Look at the original cards how do they have their capitalization, and do it. Without looking at cards, just use the NORMAL English capitalization. Wizard, Angel and such look nubby. If there were card-making rules, DEFINITELY, there would be a rule: "Don't create stupid sub-types". Wanna make new sub-types? Don't make ones that are too close to a normal Sub-type. The harm is when you only create 'Wizard' while Spellcaster is already there, and so on. P.S. If You Have A Problem With My Cards Dont Comment On Them.P.P.S. I Cant Handle Un Capitalized Things It Is Just By Force Of Habit The P.S. you wrote me is stupid. You'll never improve if you never find the bad stuff in them. The P.P.S. is stupid too, you're not following grammar, actually, by writing in this new-invented capitalization of yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dragon Posted December 14, 2007 Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 the pics are pretti bluri ... and some of them owerpovered... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilrow Posted December 15, 2007 Report Share Posted December 15, 2007 The cards need better and more refined effects, and a lot of the pictures were blurry. Plus there is no Recruit LV5. 5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natedog2001 Posted December 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2007 Ummm There Is A Recruit LVL Just Look And You Will See It **PPL. YES, MY RECRUIT LVL 5 CARDS IS AN EFFECT MONSTER AND IT DOES NOT SAY EFFECT, I AM FIXING IT.** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackpantherb Posted December 15, 2007 Report Share Posted December 15, 2007 I love your effects :) U.R. SSSSIIIIICCCCKKKKK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(!Death!Reborn!) Posted December 17, 2007 Report Share Posted December 17, 2007 Nice Cards 10/10 Love it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishfood20 Posted December 21, 2007 Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 have a quick question where do you get the pictures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishfood20 Posted December 21, 2007 Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 cool we have some of the same Ideas do you like them ?[attachment=17172] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death's Seduction Posted January 4, 2008 Report Share Posted January 4, 2008 great 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin888 Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Wow awesome 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SacraficeOfDragons1016 Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 sorry i dont think thery that great!!!!! but the effects are nice!!! 5/10 great effeort Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Sweetness. OCG 8/20Effort 20/20Pics18/20Names14/20Flavor Text 8/20 Total: 68/100 (68%!) Note: What can I say? U tried hard, but ur flavor text and OCG errors are just some things u need to brush up on a little. 100% if effort was the only catagory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeybat99 Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 dude love your cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LewieGee Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 OK, but: -bad OCG on some cards-there are already cards with these names, i.e. Water Dragon-irrelevant types. (ghost? angel?)-overpoweredness-spelling mistakes-Normal monsters with effects-capitalisations-bad or blurry pictues but, all that aside, you've made a lot of cool cards. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rileyandjose Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 I really only liked the dragons but they were good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.