Jump to content

Flooding.


Brushfire

Recommended Posts

LOL WHAT?

You think we havent tried to find a reason thats wrong about his flooding? We have. Nothing bannable. So get over it' date=' he aint going nowhere.

 

And ~JG~ as a mod of CC? Sacrifice your mother first.

[/quote']

 

Rule ?) (IT EXISTS, I JUST CAN'T FIND FRUNK'S RULE THREAD ANYWHERE ANYMORE), No Flooding. There's your bannable offence.

 

And lol, Roxas and Xander should be promoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Noobs. What are we going to do with them?

 

Harvest more.

 

Just what kind of question is that?

O_o

 

simple' date=' you monotor the clubs that spam the most and when the push down a lot of threads or they go crazy on spam, you temporaryly lock them, of course [b']you only lock them for like and hour[/b] and you warn them first but if they dont heed you lock them temporaraly

 

Yeah, that will teach 'em a lesson.

-__-

 

And monitor them?

Like anyone has that much time or patience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noobs. What are we going to do with them?

 

Harvest more.

 

Just what kind of question is that?

O_o

 

simple' date=' you monotor the clubs that spam the most and when the push down a lot of threads or they go crazy on spam, you temporaryly lock them, of course [b']you only lock them for like and hour[/b] and you warn them first but if they dont heed you lock them temporaraly

 

Yeah, that will teach 'em a lesson.

-__-

 

And monitor them?

Like anyone has that much time or patience.

 

Exactly, only n00bs will post a suggestion like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Zeonark

Noobs. What are we going to do with them?

 

Harvest more.

 

Just what kind of question is that?

O_o

 

I thought I posted that' date=' yet it somehow got quoted as Silent Omega...I lol'd.

 

simple, you monotor the clubs that spam the most and when the push down a lot of threads or they go crazy on spam, you temporaryly lock them, of course you only lock them for like and hour and you warn them first but if they dont heed you lock them temporaraly

 

First of all, a hour is teaching nobody anything. Second of all, who the hell is going to monitor a forum for three hours straight expecting spam?

 

Give a nice, clean, smack in the face. A E-Smack if you will. It solves everything.

 

Exactly, only n00bs will post a suggestion like that

 

ITT: We find new noobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The majority of Your Deck posts are mentally retarded people who are afraid to go aside posting insults about other people and their Decks. >_>

 

Example: sbnate in any thread in which the Deck isn't that great.

 

sbdnate has changed since his ban.

 

The real problem is that decent decks only get a few comments because crummy threads are flooded by idiots (who are just as bad) continuing to post inane comments relating to the topic's level of fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dweller of Parables says hi.

 

Screw him.

 

Without Dweller of Parables' date=' YCM would be a little bit better.

[/quote']

 

I was agreeing with this point.

I may second telling him. :P And I remember the time where he posted all those crappy hair colours. I forgot if there was pink hair. :P

 

Realistic Cards is also a big hole too.

 

But ragnarok would say hi to this too.

 

Wooorrking on it....

Tell me more. Good thing I don't go there and do that anymore. Yeesh, if it weren't for Arc and his rebellion of doomzy, I would still be called "Worser than Ragnarok".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Zeonark

Rule ?) (IT EXISTS' date=' I JUST CAN'T FIND FRUNK'S RULE THREAD ANYWHERE ANYMORE), No Flooding. There's your bannable offence.

[/quote']

 

Then I should really break out my hammer. RP gets the most flooding on this board by far; don't debate it.

 

That's obvious.

60,000 RPs get updated once every three seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule ?) (IT EXISTS' date=' I JUST CAN'T FIND FRUNK'S RULE THREAD ANYWHERE ANYMORE), No Flooding. There's your bannable offence.

[/quote']

 

Then I should really break out my hammer. RP gets the most flooding on this board by far; don't debate it.

 

Rule 23

No Flooding

Flooding is when someone spams up a topic or many topics' date=' in which can be costly in terms of wasting good bandwidth and can be harmful to the reliability of a computer network. Flooding can also be seriously annoying to other members on the forum. A serious case of flooding is when a member posts many new threads in one forum. Another word that indirectly relates to flooding is SPAM (See Rule 5).

 

Another directation to flooding is when someone has already said the exact same thing such as "Plz Lock This" or "This is Spam". Technically, if this has only said once, there is no need for it to be said again, if so, this is called Spam, or if there is many of them, it is called Flooding. Instead of saying "Plz Lock", report the post to a mod via the REPORT button, and a mod will lock it when they can.

 

By spamming and/or flooding a certain forum, a ban will be initiated. By how much you flood the forum/thread depends on the time of your ban.

 

If you accidentally make two threads for a topic, ask a mod to lock it. Flooding is generally annoying, in which, try posting cards in ONE whole thread, especially if you are posting many cards within a certain time frame.

[/quote']

 

Do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule ?) (IT EXISTS' date=' I JUST CAN'T FIND FRUNK'S RULE THREAD ANYWHERE ANYMORE), No Flooding. There's your bannable offence.

[/quote']

 

Then I should really break out my hammer. RP gets the most flooding on this board by far; don't debate it.

 

I like your pineapple

 

And I don't like your spam. =)

The pineapple is really cool, btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really know of flooding on this forum since I haven't been here long enough, but flooding is a big deal on almost every active forum.

 

You need to be a popular member or have an interesting topic to keep your threads up, while most of the other threads are wiped away because no one posts in them or because of how many more topics are posted.

 

Sometimes threads aren't so interesting either. If we improved the rate of posting members in one thread, maybe flooding won't be much of a problem. Hmm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Running around in circles...

 

Hmm? How so?

 

Your whole comment went round in circles until you decided that we should limit discussion to a set number of threads' date=' which isn't a great idea.

[/quote']

 

Oh, forgive me on my useless idea. I'm not really sure how to limit flooding, nor do I think it's possible. What I posted before was the only idea I had on the topic. I didn't think it was all that good either.

 

Since flooding isn't allowed on most forums, reducing the people who flood could be possible. What might you say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...