Guest Zeonark Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 [align=center]Now I'm sure I'm doing this wrong. [spoiler=Lore]If you use this card to Tribute Summon a "Flamvell" monster, the Summoned monster gains 300 ATK. If this card is removed from play by the effect of "Flamvell Commando", inflict damage to your opponent equal to double the ATK of this card OR destroy 1 monster your opponent controls. Idea/Suggestion by HP Doom.Yes you <3 I have no clue what else to add to it's effect. /: Image Credit = HP Doom. Fix the OCG. Rate/Hate/Comment. Whatever.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.area51player. Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Inflict damage to who?Pure awesomness pic <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 you didn't say who you're inflicting the damage to and 3000 burn is a bit too much. I'd lower it a bit 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Inflict damage to who?Pure awesomness pic <3 you didn't say who you're inflicting the damage to and 3000 burn is a bit too much. I'd lower it a bit 8/10 Fixed the inflicting part. Should I lower it to 2000? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.area51player. Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I still think it's wrong.Just inflict damage to your opponent.Not to your opponent's Life Points.Meh, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Inflict damage to who?Pure awesomness pic <3 you didn't say who you're inflicting the damage to and 3000 burn is a bit too much. I'd lower it a bit 8/10 Fixed the inflicting part. Should I lower it to 2000? yeah 2000 should be a reasonable amount Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Seriously, don't. 4500 damage with a 2 card combo? That's a little steep. Pic is very nice though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everlasting Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Fixed the inflicting part. Should I lower it to 2000?2000 should work, but I'm not 100% positive. I'd wait for more feedback to change it, but 3000, like ragnarok said, is way to much. anyways, nice card, 8.5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I still think it's wrong.Just inflict damage to your opponent.Not to your opponent's Life Points.Meh' date=' anyway.[/quote'] Fixed. Inflict damage to who?Pure awesomness pic <3 you didn't say who you're inflicting the damage to and 3000 burn is a bit too much. I'd lower it a bit 8/10 Fixed the inflicting part. Should I lower it to 2000? yeah 2000 should be a reasonable amount Dropped. Seriously' date=' don't. 4500 damage with a 2 card combo? That's a little steep. Pic is very nice though.[/quote'] Oh come on! It'd own most people these days! *Shot*Lol. Thank HP. Fixed the inflicting part. Should I lower it to 2000?2000 should work' date=' but I'm not 100% positive. I'd wait for more feedback to change it, but 3000, like ragnarok said, is way to much. anyways, nice card, 8.5/10.[/quote'] If I get some more feedback on increasing it, I'll up it to 2500. Thanks everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.area51player. Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Now it seems better9.2, I'd say ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DOOM Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 If you use this card to Tribut Summon a "Flamvell" monster, the Summoned monster gains 300 ATK. If this card is removed from play by the effect of "Flamvell Commando", inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of this card [suggestion: OR destroy 1 monster your opponent controls. ] nice card;] you did not fail, this deserves a 9/10, altough 3000 damage is really a bit too high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.area51player. Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 If you use this card to Tribute Summon a "Flamvell" monster' date=' the Summoned monster gains 300 ATK. If this card is removed from play by the effect of "Flamvell Commando", inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of this card [suggestion: OR destroy 1 monster your opponent controls. '] nice card;] you did not fail, this deserves a 9/10, altough 3000 damage is really a bit too high.Hmm, sorry if it was a spam, you may report me '-' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 If you use this card to Tribut Summon a "Flamvell" monster' date=' the Summoned monster gains 300 ATK. If this card is removed from play by the effect of "Flamvell Commando", inflict damage to your opponent equal to the ATK of this card [suggestion: OR destroy 1 monster your opponent controls. '] nice card;] you did not fail, this deserves a 9/10, altough 3000 damage is really a bit too high. That's actually better. I'll fix it to that. 8D Thanks HP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DOOM Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 i'm glad i could help you!^^ O_O why is rag banned???!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.area51player. Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Spam again, but... He was perma banned, I think. Hm.. See that I fixed your OCG above Doom ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 There is a thread that they say they will permban ragnarok, now they did it >_<No!!!!!!!!!! On-topic:Card pic is nice, effect is good as allways.OCG seems allright9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 He was perma banned' date=' I think.[/quote'] Noooo.Who else will rate my Chaos Distortions? D: Thanks ઽђαđѳખρℓαઽʍα.And this should be the last fix I'll need to do on this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DOOM Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Spam again' date=' but... He was perma banned, I think. Hm.. See that I fixed your OCG above Doom ;)[/quote'] mhm i forgot an e......... damn it!! they banned rag, i can't believe it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.area51player. Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Even legends make misakes .>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wuu. Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Spam again' date=' but... He was perma banned, I think. Hm.. See that I fixed your OCG above Doom ;)[/quote'] mhm i forgot an e......... damn it!! they banned rag, i can't believe itIs... Is Ragnarok-Sama perma banned? Noo! That's impossible! Cool card Zeo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gustavosuarez Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 nice effect, but i still thinking that 2000 is too high. maybe only 1000. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 nice effect' date=' but i still thinking that 2000 is too high. maybe only 1000. 9/10[/quote'] I think that'd be too low. One way is because it still has to survive one turn before Commando comes out, and I'm pretty sure it's going to be ridiculously irritating to protect a 500/200 monster only for 1000 damage burn. Then again, I have no clue what I'm talking about. So if someone else goes with your suggestion, I'll drop it. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DOOM Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 just keep the 2000, since flamvell commande is not limited or anything because of Celestia, which would inflict 2300 damge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Ragnarok will actually return if he is only prema banned...But i think he will be for like 3 weeks that he will be banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Wolf Sif Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Wonderful.I love the Flamvell. 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.