έκλειψη Posted January 6, 2010 Report Share Posted January 6, 2010 Effect: Activate only when you control 1 or more Level 6 or higher WIND monsters. Pay 800 Life Points to destroy all cards on the field and negate any effects of the destroyed cards. I'm thinking of making it Level 8 or higher....Rate? Hehe. My bad, It's a COUNTER, not a quick-play. Sorry again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 6, 2010 Report Share Posted January 6, 2010 Quick-Play Traps do not belong in Realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted January 6, 2010 Report Share Posted January 6, 2010 Quick-Play Traps do not belong in Realistic. Revoked. It does, assuming he plays the idea right. But that's subject to the person unless it's extreme. This is riding the fence... It's fine. Otherwise it goes in AoC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mackeyz Posted January 6, 2010 Report Share Posted January 6, 2010 level 6 it's ok, but increase life points should you paid 4/5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 6, 2010 Report Share Posted January 6, 2010 Quick-Play Traps do not belong in Realistic. Revoked. It does' date=' assuming he plays the idea right. But that's subject to the person unless it's extreme. This is riding the fence... It's fine. Otherwise it goes in AoC.[/quote'] Unless he makes a self-consistent set of rules defining Quick-Play Trap - and I see no such rules - it is a completely meaningless classification and therefore unrealistic. It's like fake sub-Types; you can make them, but you need to define them, or it's nonsense. I agree that it's fine if "he plays the idea right", but he's not playing the idea here at all, let alone playing it right, so that hardly applies. However, he has informed me by PM that it was not meant to be Quick-Play and that he's fixing it, so it's fine anyhow. Incidentally, did you delete my post in that interview thread? My post was highly relevant, and made my views perfectly clear (albeit perhaps not in the format you were expecting). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.