Jump to content

The New World Order.

έκλειψη

By έκλειψη
in General

Recommended Posts

έκλειψη Newbie

έκλειψη

Posted
Posted

... Not really, but what I think about the world right now.

 

Too Many People

I understand that, within about 500 years, the population has increased to such a point that the world is worried... I understand that people wish to have kids, and I wouldn't be here had this not been so. Now, however, I think it's time we stop. People wish to have kids, possibly in hope one of them will make it, but honestly, let's fix things first.

Here are a few links that show current population growth rates. The first three are developed countries, the next three developing.

http://images.nationmaster.com/images/pyramids/us-2005.png

http://images.nationmaster.com/images/pyramids/fr-2005.png

http://images.nationmaster.com/images/pyramids/ja-2005.png

 

http://images.nationmaster.com/images/pyramids/ha-2005.png

http://images.nationmaster.com/images/pyramids/id-2005.png

http://images.nationmaster.com/images/pyramids/et-2005.png

 

These are from the 2005 U.S Census Bureau.

 

Now, I am not saying that people in undeveloped nations are sex perverts and need to be stopped; I am saying that instead of constantly having children, they should try their best to solve this problem in their generation entirely. Undeveloped countries have many factors that shorten life-spans, though I still think there should be something done about this, such as the 1-child Rule.

 

Developed countries aren't innocent however. So many people in developed countries have children; some have children when they are mere children themselves, just at those who are in high school or lower. This isn't to say that only teenage parents cannot take care of their kids, or that all teenage parents can't, but to make a generalization, they shouldn't. Developed countries should, instead of having their own children, help by adopting children that would, in their home country, die. Perhaps children should not be allowed in these developed countries other than by adoption, or, if they are, the 1CR be implemented here as well. Before you argue about how emotions take part in this; I care not about emotions; this is simply a theory as to how to solve this problem.

I don't think just anyone should be able to adopt a child, though. There should be background checks, as well as a zero-tolerance policy to abuse. This means life imprisonment, the death penalty, or exile. Investigations in such matters are to be taken seriously. After perhaps, two to three decades, the use of this idea would prove to be a good idea. That is, if it is followed correctly. There are to be no exceptions for the 1-child rule, and those who have children are to be punished as those who abuse children, the child placed into the International Adoption Agency.

 

The Environment: Restoring It

The environment is something that I myself know I am a hypocrite of, as I am typing right now, and that is not necessary to live. I do think, however, that a major threat, aside from air and water pollution, is deforestation. Some countries destroy forests for buildings. Developing countries, such as several South American countries, do this to the Amazon, despite warning from other countries. It is only understandable, though; the U.S, as well as other developed or developing countries, have done the same, wiping out much of their forests. Taking the previously stated steps to reduce population may help, but there are also other things that can be done, such as funding more clean energy research and funding countries to restore and maintain their forests. Wasting water to live in places no-one should anyways if also important. If you can't survive without utilities, you shouldn't be there. I live in perhaps one of the best places to state this, as, with two massive rivers within miles of my home, one of them down the street and containing fish, I'm sure I could. It turns out that, in the U.S, less than 5 percent of total water is even used for cooking and drinking. Oh, well; the world wouldn't let us do it if it was bad, right?

 

Money: Why the hell is it needed?

 

Well, the entire world seems to need money. Money, money, money... If countries abandoned the idea of money, instead helping because such if the better thing to do, imagine how much easier things would be. This is not, however simply a giveaway for games and other things. The concept of money can still exist to get miscellaneous items, but things such as food and water should be supplied to those unable to get their own free of charge. This also means people should hunt, and farms would become merely for individual homes and families, other then World Government farms designed to aid natural disaster victims. Perhaps computers, being communication devices, can be issued to families by those companies, limit 2 per home. This is to keep the public aware free of charge.

 

More thoughts to be added, more research to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Azmodius Newbie

Azmodius

Posted
Posted

In a perfect world... Money would not exist. The government would regulate the wealth and provisions and control the business and the entire finance of the country, to not waste the funds and use them for a good cause, and spread the wealth. In a situation like this, money should not apply, or atleast the government could transmit wealth and supplies equally, or based on work hours, instead of having a free market which leads to greed and poverty. The system we have is a biased system. Your success is based on skills you naturally have or have aquirred, now thats okay. But the government should have complete control of income and funds for millitary, agriculture, etc, to prevent greed, poverty in some, richness in others. Things that need to stop to make the human race progress. Someone said "In order to evolve, we should abbandon darwinism". Because Dawrinism is kinda defied here (survival of the fittest etc).

 

I probably said that really crappy, but w/e.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dark Newbie

Dark

Posted
Posted

Every year, randomly choose 1 day and call a mass genocide of any person born on that day.

 

Effectively kills 1/365 of the population every year.

 

Or better yet, stop giving medicines to third-world countries. While it may sound mean, the disease and pollution will kill them off, lowering the population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lawliet L. Ryuzaki Newbie

Lawliet L. Ryuzaki

Posted
Posted

Every year' date=' randomly choose 1 day and call a mass genocide of any person born on that day.

 

Effectively kills 1/365 of the population every year.

 

Or better yet, stop giving medicines to third-world countries. While it may sound mean, the disease and pollution will kill them off, lowering the population.

[/quote']

 

1rst idea is horrible, in-humane, and very much like what Hitler/Stalin/and That one Pharoah in the bible did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willieh Newbie

Willieh

Posted
Posted

I don't really get how overpopulation is a problem we need to worry about at the moment... =\

 

But the best way to stop overpopulation, in my opinion, is for people to start adopting more children. There are lots and LOTS of children that are homeless. And there is a surprising amount of children that are in slavery right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
έκλειψη Newbie

έκλειψη

Posted
  • Author
Posted

But the best way to stop overpopulation' date=' in my opinion, is for people to start adopting more children. There are lots and LOTS of children that are homeless. And there is a surprising amount of children that are in slavery right now.

[/quote']

 

I'm pretty sure that's what that whole Too Many People thing was about...

 

The International Adoption Agency can handle this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willieh Newbie

Willieh

Posted
Posted

But the best way to stop overpopulation' date=' in my opinion, is for people to start adopting more children. There are lots and LOTS of children that are homeless. And there is a surprising amount of children that are in slavery right now.

[/quote']

 

I'm pretty sure that's what that whole Too Many People thing was about...

 

The International Adoption Agency can handle this...

 

The International Adoption Agency can't give kids to people who don't want to adopt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willieh Newbie

Willieh

Posted
Posted

Said people are to be executed' date=' then...

 

This is the New World Order. We'll solve this population issue. You can either obey and help the cause peacefully, or we can end you.

 

A person is a person.

[/quote']

 

That's contradictory. If you enforce your ideas with violence, you become the enemy of revolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willieh Newbie

Willieh

Posted
Posted

No' date=' we don't slaughter anyone...

You go to court, and are dealt with from there.

If someone doesn't adopt a kid, they have broken federal law and art to be punished as those who abuse children. As stated in the main post, child abuse = death penalty.

[/quote']

 

If someone doesn't want to adopt a kid, they go to prison? What kind of funked up law is that? That would probably lead to more child abuse, and as a result more death sentences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...