Felix Culpa Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr), so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 I have no idea what you meant to say, but ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 It's just probability. It doesn't mean that there would be exactly 3 right hands and 1 left hand if the parents have 4 kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 Doctors and parents who predict this get ninja'd in the end.They always get ninja'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. A gene can't really take over unless they kill everyone with another eye color gene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I have no idea what you meant to say' date=' but ok.[/quote'] Punnet Square says hi. Anyways Im left handed, everybody else in my family is right (Cept my step dad but I don't think that counts, and no my dad was right handed.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. A gene can't really take over unless they kill everyone with another eye color gene. *facepalm* Answer me after you've finished learning genetics please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 My brother is the only left-handed person out of the eight people in my family.Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. A gene can't really take over unless they kill everyone with another eye color gene. *facepalm* Answer me after you've finished learning genetics please. D: I'm ashamed to say I don't get your it. What are you saying then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted January 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I have no idea what you meant to say' date=' but ok.[/quote'] Punnet Square says hi. Anyways Im left handed, everybody else in my family is right (Cept my step dad but I don't think that counts, and no my dad was right handed.) Well, that can be explained. You have relatives that are Rr, so you have a slim chance of being left-handed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lightning Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I for one, am left. Don't know how it happened, since no one in my friggen family is left handed >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted January 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I for one' date=' am left. Don't know how it happened, since no one in my friggen family is left handed >.>[/quote'] see the post above yours.Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. 1/4.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I for one' date=' am left. Don't know how it happened, since no one in my friggen family is left handed >.>[/quote'] see the post above yours.Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. 1/4.... No, it's a 1/8 probability that 2 people would have a left handed gene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] o_O This is what happens when I help freshmen with bio. I get threads like these. If we are assuming R is right and r is left, and assuming both parents are hetero, it'd look like this: ...|R|r|R|RR|Rrr.|Rr.|rr It's a shitty punnet square, but you get it. Thus, 25% of kids would be homo for right, 50% would be hetero for right, and 25% would be (homo for) left. But that is only probability. There is still a chance that, after having 8 children, you'd have 8 left-handed children. The chance is low, but it's there. If I had 4 children, it's not necessary for 3 to be right and 1 to be left. [/rant] I'm right-handed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted January 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I for one' date=' am left. Don't know how it happened, since no one in my friggen family is left handed >.>[/quote'] see the post above yours.Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. 1/4.... No, it's a 1/8 probability that 2 people would have a left handed gene. I thought you meant the chance of one. My bad. Good math... That could sound so racist... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let us imagine the trait for Right-handedness is R and the trait for Left-handedness is r. My parents are both heterozygous for the trait (Rr)' date=' so that means that out of the 4 children they should have, only 1 child should have homozygous left-handedness (rr). But two of us are right-handed. And the other two left (obviously). Discuss unexpected surprises, genetics, and handednesses.[/quote'] Well, that's a 1/8 chance, so not much of a big deal. It's amazing that the brown eyed gene might take over the world someday. A gene can't really take over unless they kill everyone with another eye color gene. *facepalm* Answer me after you've finished learning genetics please. Actually, he's kinda right. Unless we see a DRASTIC change in eye color frequency, we won't get rid of a gene. It would take HUNDREDS of Generations to get rid of an eye color gene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 In a sense, you'd have to kill every hetero person in the world, and every homo person with an eye color other than brown. So the only people left are homo for brown. D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted January 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 In a sense' date=' you'd have to kill every hetero person in the world, and every homo person with an eye color other than brown. So the only people left are homo for brown. D:[/quote'] Gosh.. you didn't have to drag sexuality into this... loljk. Yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 In a sense' date=' you'd have to kill every hetero person in the world, and every homo person with an eye color other than brown. So the only people left are homo for brown. D:[/quote'] I lol'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted January 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let's change the subject to bloodtypes. What's yours? A - Co-dominantB - Co-dominantO- Recessive. I'm OO. So Blood type O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Are you - or +? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let's change the subject to bloodtypes. What's yours? A - Co-dominantB - Co-dominantO- Recessive. I'm OO. So Blood type O. I'm O negative. And it's shocking O is recessive, considering it's the (or second) most common blood type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted January 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Yeah, well, most of the dominant traits have been bred down. Brown is dominant to blue, but Sweden is almost entirely blue-eyed and black hair is dominant to blonde but Sweden, once again, is almost entirely blonde. It's very hard to breed specially with humans, nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Let's change the subject to bloodtypes. What's yours? A - Co-dominantB - Co-dominantO- Recessive. I'm OO. So Blood type O. I'm O negative. And it's shocking O is recessive' date=' considering it's the (or second) most common blood type.[/quote'] Look at the population of China and India. Yea, maybe that's why. I have a O Positive. Don't get what the difference is between positive and negative types though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 Yeah' date=' well, most of the dominant traits have been bred down. Brown is dominant to blue, but Sweden is almost entirely blue-eyed and black hair is dominant to blonde but Sweden, once again, is almost entirely blonde. It's very hard to breed specially with humans, nowadays.[/quote'] Because then you'd have to force people to have sex with others to breed down certain traits. But it's not forced if you're willing. ;) I wouldn't mind doing a foreign (sp?) model. @ Pikachu: I don't know what is the difference between pos and neg in blood types, but IIRC, neg is rarer. Not sure if neg is recessive, but it's rarer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.