My first post/card

[animedude3000]

Here is one of my first cards. It's meant to be an anti-meta card of sorts. :)

I'm sure that others have done something similar in the past. I hope you all like it! :D

 

[animedude3000]

Here is one of my first cards. It's meant to be an anti-meta card of sorts. :)

I'm sure that others have done something similar in the past. I hope you all like it! :D

 

[animedude3000]

Here is one of my first cards. It's meant to be an anti-meta card of sorts. :)

I'm sure that others have done something similar in the past. I hope you all like it! :D

 

[animedude3000]

Here is one of my first cards. It's meant to be an anti-meta card of sorts. :)

I'm sure that others have done something similar in the past. I hope you all like it! :D

 

[.:Shaymin:.]

What the f--- is this

Man first cards kinda of fail

What the point of making this a spell card

1/10

I only like the picture

[Rikden]

Some cards have ability based on names like archfeinds.

[speck]

Yeah but all cards still need names. you can change attributes, types or negate effects, but cards with no names is a little pointless. :?

[Lefty]

true. lol'd at the card because of the pic. ;P

funny pic

well, its a "so & so" kind of thing. ;/

[animedude3000]

Yeah but all cards still need names. you can change attributes' date=' types or negate effects, but cards with no names is a little pointless. :?

[/quote']

 

Cards having no name is point of this card. It means that you can't discard a Destiny Hero for Destiny Draw, a LS monster for Solar Recharge, you can't summon JD b/c there's technically no LS monsters in the grave, you can't tag in a Glad Beast b/c it has no name, etc etc. You get the picture. Hence why I said it's an anti-meta card.

[speck]

I see your point, still you could say, negate all card effects that designate a card name.

[animedude3000]

I see your point' date=' still you could say, negate all card effects that designate a card name.

[/quote']

 

It wouldn't be quite as powerful if it was worded the way you mentioned. E.g. The requirement of having 4 of more LS monsters of different names in the grave for JD isn't an effect, but a summoning condition. Thus, JD could still be summoned since the LS monsters still have a name (if we go by the wording you provided).

[.:Shaymin:.]

Wau why are we still talking about this

[Aero~]

pretty good. should say:

 

If a card effect would require a specific card, the required card's name is treated as " ".

[YugiMasterMind]

well played! for making flying pigs better then this joke

[.:Shaymin:.]

To me this card belongs to the joke card thread

[Dante Dimercurio]

Haha, I like this... You are creative...

 

But I suggest that you find a way to use your creative powers and make it so that the card is a use in battle.

[animedude3000]

Haha. I don't know about making it battle oriented. But maybe I can make some future cards that will be.

[CARLCGL]

mmmm

interesting....

 

maybe:

While this card is face-up on the field, all monster cards names in both players field, hand or graveyard are treated as ''forgotten monster''.