STG: NEVER Before Seen Concept | Unflitered and Legit Type Version Added

[Dragon™]

[align=center]Unless I'm mistaken, and somebody has done this before, I think it's brand-new.

 

[spoiler=[color=#32CD32]Storm Destroyer Giganti[/color]]

- Lore -

Each turn, during your Battle Phase, roll a 6-sided Die. If the result is 1, 2, or 3, choose the type of this card. If the result is 4, 5, or 6, destroy 1 card on your and your opponent's side of the field. When this card attacks a face-down monster, the face-down monster is destroyed.

 

 

 

[spoiler=Unedited Version]

 

Epic pic by HP Doom

Comment, rate, epicl33t, shid, whatever.[/align]

[cmc1234]

Im assuming the concept is you get to choose what type it is by rolling the die. Well technically doesnt it still have a type since it says "Unknown"

 

I like the pic and i like the edits you made to it.

 

8/10

[ryan995]

cool effect love it 10/10!

[ChaosIncarn]

o_0 Definitely a never before seen.

 

Gotta give you points for originality. Rather interesting and I could come to like it. 8/10

[Dragon™]

Well, I wasn't gonna put ???? or something, that's still a type, I didn't know if I should put nothing. I mean, you DO get the effect, it is NOT an archtype which means its legit.

 

Thanks for commenting.

[Jazin Kay]

Why does the card look all worn-out and weathered?

 

IMHO, it makes it look horrible.

[Dragon™]

Lol it's because I wrote, "I made awesome happen before Jazin Kay".

 

Not horrible. Makes it look epic says majority.

 

Rate by effect please?

[Jazin Kay]

I don't even see that typed there. Or anywhere.

 

And no, horrible. It makes the card look waterlogged, or like someone doesn't know how to use certain filters.

[Dragon™]

Well I personally think, and others- that it's cool. I'm sorry to hear you don't like it. Just rate it for the effect dammit T.T

[ragnarok1945]

Unknown is not a real type, but fortunately that was made up for in the effect

 

I suggest you also add an alternative effect for the 4, 5, or 6 effect, just in case your opponent has no cards on his/her side of the field to destroy

 

9/10

[Blakeasirda]

I disagree with ragnarok. The effect of destroying one on both sides of the field adds a danger to trying to change the type if your opponent doesn't have a card on their feild. A well balanced card. I like the picture it is cool. Not what I would call epic unforunatly but definitaly different. I like the whole concept of the card. all in all a good card.

5/5 for balance

3/3 for originality

1.5/2 for picture

total points 9.5/10 a very good job!

[usetheforcehan]

Well' date=' I wasn't gonna put ???? or something, that's still a type, I didn't know if I should put nothing. I mean, you DO get the effect, it is NOT an archtype which means its legit.

 

Thanks for commenting.

[/quote']

 

In some monsters we sometime see its ATK ???? and DEF ???? (Winged-Dragon Ra). And it is legit. And Why not make that monster ????-Type ?

 

For the pic i assume you use GIMP and use Filter > Artistic > Cartoon. I think you better use the Cartoon Filter on card pic only, don't use it on the whole card. Because we hardly see the card lore/text.

[Lexadin]

It is an unussial effect, but it was done before. Only not with an new Type. Maybe add that "this card's Type is treated as none." or something like that.

I don't like the effect's on the card that much.

Rest seems ok.

A 8/10

[Wuu.]

Effects that include dicing are a somewhat common sight on YCM, well it used to be.

 

Also, if you think that the concept is never seen before i'd like you to meet Skull Dice

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Skull_Dice

[Jolta]

This works well against a Deck which focuses on Setting.

 

9/10

 

Ahh... Fake Types, one of the best ones is Unknown.

[MarbleZone]

I'm all for originality, but this won't do. "Unknown", as it is, is a type by itself, so your effect doesn't make sense. Make it an already existing type and reword the effect:

 

OCG: If this card attacks a face-down Defense Position monster, destroy the monster immediately with this card's effect without flipping it face-up or applying damage calculation. During your Battle Phase, roll a 6-sided Die. • 1, 2, or 3: You can change this card's Type. • 4, 5, or 6: Destroy 1 card you control and 1 card your opponent controls.

 

Graphically I share the opinion that it doesn't look good, and I'm sorry, but when rating a card, that simply must be taken into account and you can't ask the raters to just ignore what they don't like.

 

I'm also not sure what you call "new concept" - the dice roll?

[Dragon™]

Wow -.- the new concept is chosing the type of the card. I have never seen any cards using bullet points with Die rolls.

 

No really, WHAT to put besides 'Unknown'?

[MarbleZone]

Like I said, an existing type, with the possibility of changing it. Much like Clar Vice Dragon - they didn't make it "attribute-less" like it should be by the anime - they made him DARK, and added the "you are unaffected by Clear World", which amounts to exactly the same but is in accordance with the actual game rules.

 

As for the type change, I don't recall any cards doing that before, no, but I also don't see any reason whatsoever, since you gain nothing by changing its type - the rest of the effect is completely independent of that first effect, which essentially makes it useless. If you make a card with a new mechanic, focus on and make it actually matter. How does the card take advantage of the type change? It doesn't.

 

Lastly, the bullets apply to any action that can generate multiple results. It is applicable to coin tosses (Arcana Force) as well as any other action that can branch into different independent consequences.

[usetheforcehan]

No really' date=' WHAT to put besides 'Unknown'?

[/quote']

 

Put This: [ ???? / Effect]

 

As for the type change' date=' I don't recall any cards doing that before, no, but I also don't see any reason whatsoever, since you [b']gain nothing by changing its type[/b] - the rest of the effect is completely independent of that first effect, which essentially makes it useless. If you make a card with a new mechanic, focus on and make it actually matter. How does the card take advantage of the type change? It doesn't.

 

There are Field Spell Cards that increase the ATK or DEF of a certain monster's Type. There are also card's effect that focusing on strengthen certain monster's Type.

This card can gains the benefit of that kind of card/effect. I don't think changing monster's Type is useless.

[MarbleZone]

Field cards that boost attack by type are one of the worst cards in the game nobody, and I mean nobody, in their right mind would play them. Sure it can bring advantages, but why not run a card of the type you want in the first place? If this card's other effects took advantage of the type swap, and there are millions of ways to make that happen, then it'd be worth it. As it is, it's inconsequential.

[usetheforcehan]

If this card's other effects took advantage of the type swap' date='[/b'] and there are millions of ways to make that happen, then it'd be worth it. As it is, it's inconsequential.

 

Hmmm. Maybe if this card's effect change into: "If the result is 1, 2, or 3, choose 1 face-up monster on the field and change that monster's Type." then you can change Blue-Eyes White Dragon into Fish-Type. :D

[Luminoth]

I thought the effect rocked nice idea but I think the same as Marbel Zone, try an alread existing tyoe, maybe Psychic seing as their aren't many of them and it can represent just about any card

[Dragon™]

Alright, I will try that in the future seeing as I am the technicall master of type-changing. I can't believe this thread has 2 pages, even though it's from an argument. Thanks for rates.

 

Maybe a couple more?

[archie17]

No such thing as Unknown-Type, Filter used to make card's appearance is unimpressive, and its destructive effects are OP'ed for a Level 4. All in all an unrealistic card.

 

4/10

[Dragon™]

No such thing as Unknown-Type' date=' Filter used to make card's appearance is unimpressive, and its destructive effects are OP'ed for a Level 4. All in all an unrealistic card.

 

4/10

 

Do you even know what an Archtype is?

The Level is not related to how powerful the effect is, I've seen real cards that are low Level with a somewhat OP effect. Anyway, thanks for commenting.

 

I can post the unedited version.

 

EDIT: Posted