[Zeaux] Ambrose Knight

[Zeaux]

[align=center]

Ambrose Knight

 

 

-Card Effect-

 

You can Special Summon this card during your opponent's Standby Phase by discarding 1 card. During your opponent's turn, if this card do not conduct a battle, destroy all Spell and Trap Cards they control.[/align]

[Blakeasirda]

I think it needs a draw back for if it doesn't conduct a battle. In my opinion I think that it should destroy all spell and trap cards on the field. That would balance it out.

A fair amount of attack points makes this card likely to not be attacked in the begining of the game. I like the special summoning on your opponents turn at the cost of a card from your hand.

grammar wise it is near perfect in my opinion. It should be 'During your opponent's turn, if this card does not conduct a battle, destroy all Spell and Trap Cards they control.'

other than that It is good.

Another way you can balance out this card is by making it destroy only one of their spell or traps. I would rather have that effect than the destroying all

Rating:

Balance: 1.5/3

Grammar 2.5/3

Originality 2/2

Art 2/2

Total 9/10

[Zeaux]

Your comment are always good and very helpful. 1 + rep to you buddy. :D

[ragnarok1945]

not "do not", "does not", simple grammar error, nothing big

 

it's easy to summon, very easy to nuke all your opponent spells/traps

 

you didn't even say they had to be face up or face down, so that means it applies to both. In which case this would be like a monster version of Harpy's Feather Duster

 

personally I feel this is OPed, needs more drawbacks

 

8/10

[Zeaux]

I know, I will edit it later because I did not made this card at yugiohcarmaker, I used Magic Set Editor, so I need to remake it on my PC, then upload it again, and I am bored right now. :B

 

Anyway, thanks for the comment ragnarok.

[ragnarok1945]

ok that's perfectly fine

 

I guess I'm just unused to this because before when I rated your cards, they tended to be MUCH more balanced out

[Cloister]

I think it should be "do not" and NOT "does not" (not sure though)

 

The fact that it can be Summoned during your opponent's End Phase and if so, it simply can't battle, the Spells and Traps are automatically destroyed for free, and you get to keep this card.

1. Lower ATK (to about 1450-1550 cool with the 50 extra ATK).

2. make it discard 2 cards instead of 1 to Summon it.

3. Make it destroy 1 or 2 Spell or Traps.

4. You can add to the Summoning, "during your opponent's Standby Phase".

 

8/10 now for being bit OPed

[-Griffin]

I think it should be "do not" and NOT "does not" (not sure though)

 

The fact that it can be Summoned during your opponent's End Phase and if so' date=' it simply can't battle, the Spells and Traps are automatically destroyed for free, and you get to keep this card.

1. Lower ATK (to about 1450-1550 cool with the 50 extra ATK).

2. make it discard 2 cards instead of 1 to Summon it.

3. Make it destroy 1 or 2 Spell or Traps.

4. You can add to the Summoning, "during your opponent's Standby Phase".

 

8/10 now for being bit OPed

[/quote']

 

Take one of those last three options, and just one. Any of them would stop the fact it can be a broken 1 discard for 3+ facedowns. I'd personally take the 4th option - it seems most effective and skilled.

[Zeaux]

@Ragnarok: I was 1 or 2 months away, my skills and good pictures gone with this time, I am sorry. ;s

 

Oh, good point Tomtekorv. And, yeah the 4 option looks better tome me too -Griffin. Thank you very much peoples. :]

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Hola Zeaux ^^!

 

I hasnt seen you'z around in a while :3

 

Anyways. The card is nice and fair. It's effect is a little confusing though. Does it destroy all spells and traps when your opponent doesnt battle? Or when this card doesn't battle?

 

But anyways, the picture seems fine to me :3. The card is balanced enough as well.

 

8/10 ^^

[Zeaux]

Hi Lovely. ^-^

 

I was bored, too bored from this site. ;s

 

But I am back now. =]

 

The effect of destroy all Spell and Trap Cards only activate if your opponent do not attack this card during his turn.

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Lol well Welcome back <3

 

And alrighty then :3 I like that ^^

[Zeaux]

Thank you lovely. I will edit it later to make it more balanced. :]

And thanks again! =D

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

<3 np. And where does it need more balancing? :3 i think it's balanced fine ^^

[Zeaux]

As Tomtekorv said, I can summon it after the Battle Phase, so it automatically destroy all Spell and Trap Cards your opponent controls. That is what make this card OP.

[ragnarok1945]

<3 np. And where does it need more balancing? :3 i think it's balanced fine ^^

 

please, LLD. If it was balanced fine you wouldn't have given him only 8/10

 

Tomekertov and I both felt it needs more drawbacks to it

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Oh dang o.o i didnt think of that. Well then I agree with Rag and Tom

[Zeaux]

Ha, me too. ;]

[-Griffin]

<3 np. And where does it need more balancing? :3 i think it's balanced fine ^^

 

please' date=' LLD. If it was balanced fine you wouldn't have given him only 8/10

 

Tomekertov and I both felt it needs more drawbacks to it

[/quote']

 

It doesn't need more drawbacks, it needs aa different Summoning window and a perfectly balanced card can still score a 7/10 or lower depending on other factors such as if it promotes good play.

 

Ragna, you post a lot but most of your posts are idiotic nonsense and you give a lot of bad advice. Please, learn how the game really functions before you continue slaughtering cards with bad advice that people just seem to follow because you have a high post count.

[Blakeasirda]

<3 np. And where does it need more balancing? :3 i think it's balanced fine ^^

 

please' date=' LLD. If it was balanced fine you wouldn't have given him only 8/10

 

Tomekertov and I both felt it needs more drawbacks to it

[/quote']

 

It doesn't need more drawbacks, it needs aa different Summoning window and a perfectly balanced card can still score a 7/10 or lower depending on other factors such as if it promotes good play.

 

Ragna, you post a lot but most of your posts are idiotic nonsense and you give a lot of bad advice. Please, learn how the game really functions before you continue slaughtering cards with bad advice that people just seem to follow because you have a high post count.

 

Griffin I think you should watch what you say... that I do believe is considered flaming.

[-Griffin]

I'm giving advice to him and trying to improve the section - my accusations are not at all baseless and if he listens he could much improve his criticism, which is at the moment quite awful regardless of how much there is.

 

My tone might be harsh, but quite frankly I feel its needed when someone has spent so long giving bad advice and making cards and card makers here worse.

[Blakeasirda]

A PM would have been a better place to put it. You were publicly humiliating him. You can say what ever you want in a PM and it wouldnt be flaming. Doing it in the forum though... that is a different story. This is all my opinion though. I don't run the forum so I can't say whether or not it was.

[-Griffin]

Maybe a PM would have been better, I was just attempting to also make it clear to the TC that it wasn't in need of another drawback and to C.C. that there was no need to listen to Ragna's point about the rating.

[Blakeasirda]

I understand and I am sorry for repremanding you outside of a pm. That was hypocritical

[Zeaux]

Right! Now I have edited the card to be more balanced like Tomtekorv said.

 

BUMP