weexzk Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 can you help with ocg errors please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Woah, I find it to kill yourself. But its worth it... 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakaway Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 When your opponent takes Battle damage you take half the damage your oppoenent took. To make this not OPed Whenever your opponent takes damage you take the same amount. Very less OPed that way Nob Bad for a New Memeber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 When this monster inflicts battle damage to your opponent' date=' inflict half of the battle damage to your Life Points.[/quote'] I think that's it... ...Ignoring that, this card isn't really worth it. You'll be too busy killing yourself to fully get at your opponent. It'll be useful if you're winning, sure. But if you're losing, you'll keep getting your ass kicked. Hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 oh that's just great, share the pain effect 2400 atk is also too high for a lv4 monster. Drop it down to 1900ish or something pic looks pretty good though OCG I guess would be something like "Each time this card inflicts damage to your opponent's Life Points, decrease your Life Points by half the amount inflicted to your opponent." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I don't like it, it don't worth the price, but the picture is great anyway =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 *facepalm* He wants it to have high attack at a cost. Or can't you see the idea behind the card? Also, it's awesome for SKill Drain. Balanced -_-" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizzfan911 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 *facepalm* He wants it to have high attack at a cost. Or can't you see the idea behind the card? Also' date=' it's awesome for SKill Drain. Balanced -_-"[/quote'] I would just stick with Goblin Attack Force really. This card looks like a suicide move. EDIT: Wow didn't think about that Icy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 *facepalm* He wants it to have high attack at a cost. Or can't you see the idea behind the card? Also' date=' it's awesome for SKill Drain. Balanced -_-"[/quote'] ...Oh yeah. Ever since JG's card, I keep forgetting about Skill Drain. Never mind. This card is actually worth it with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie17 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I like the effect, inflict 2400 Direct Damage with this card, but you will receive 1200 Direct Damage as well. Worth using if your strong, not worth using if your weak. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizzfan911 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Maybe change it to you only taking damage when that card attacks. You dont want to have to take half the damage from EVERY single battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie17 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Maybe change it to you only taking damage when that card attacks. You dont want to have to take half the damage from EVERY single battle. That's what makes this card balanced. I think its very well thought out indeed for a Level 4 - 2400 ATK monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizzfan911 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Yeah but Goblin Attack Force is basically the same ATK as this but just switches to defense. If you attack your opponent direct with FGD then you take 2500. It sounds more dangerous to you than your opponent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Dimercurio Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Smart idea... 10/10 my dear friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Maybe change it to you only taking damage when that card attacks. You dont want to have to take half the damage from EVERY single battle. That's what makes this card balanced. I think its very well thought out indeed for a Level 4 - 2400 ATK monster. We don't know if he was aiming for that. Atleast I think he wasn't. That would make this underpowered if you're trying to make a comeback. Unless you have Skill Drain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ixigo Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 This card is extremely useful. First of all, it can act as a great wall, stopping everything under Level 6 and the majority of Level 6 monsters in their tracks. Second of all, though you would obviously be stupid to use it to directly attack unless you are ahead in Life Points, it is such an awesome way to kill a variety of mid-level dangerous monsters, not to mention dangerous ones. The obvious weakness is misleading as it won't really come into play unless you wish it or your opponent has some specific cards to make it happen. The important part is that this guy would kill, say, Brionac for 50 LP and stay on the field afterwards. This card is very overpowered. Goblin Attack Force is balanced because even though it has the same general use, it can be essentially destroyed in the next turn without much hassle. But if your opponent's field is empty they'd be hard-pressed to counter this beatstick. And if they defend, there is no penalty for killing their monsters. Nah, too strong. Skill Drain isn't even needed. If you took double the damage your opponent took, it would be better. Also: Yeah but Goblin Attack Force is basically the same ATK as this but just switches to defense. If you attack your opponent direct with FGD then you take 2500. It sounds more dangerous to you than your opponent I lol'd right there. If you attack your opponent directly with FGD AND have this guy out, it's 7400 damage. That's almost an OTK. And if you are too low in Life Points, well, you're either careless and have not thought your deck or your strategy through, or can simply wait until either you or your opponent does something to kill this guy. Or you get Skill Drain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 ^: Battle Damage is different than Direct Damage in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gustavosuarez Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 for me its a great card. useful sometimes, not useful other times:( its all depends of the use that you do for it and the moment in that you attack with:) good idea, i like it:) 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie17 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Well when you attack directly aren't you battling so to speak, so wouldn't its effect still apply whether your attacking your opponent's monster or their Life Points? If not then that point makes this card more OP'ed -ish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ridiculosity Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Good card, quite fair. 8/10 for minor OCG wording. Although, you've been beaten to the punch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blakeasirda Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Ridiculosity,... the effects are different though... Not at all near each other. This card is good. Not over powered, if anything I think it is slightly underpowered. Needing another card to work well is not a good thiing. but the concept of this card is very good/Balance 2/3Grammar 3/3Originality 1.5/2Art 2/2Total 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luminoth Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Nit actually a bad card idea. It would do very well in a Suicide Beatdown type deck very well balanced 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ixigo Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 ^: Battle Damage is different than Direct Damage in this case. If so' date=' then this card is just that much more overpowered. Good card, quite fair. 8/10 for minor OCG wording. Although, you've been beaten to the punch: Chainsaw Insect gives your opponent the means to fight back. This card doesn't. There's no benefit to your opponent for using this card, the penalty for using it, due to its nature, will always be cheaper than what your opponent suffers, and it's all manners of epic in terms of walling or getting rid of annoying monsters up to and including most Level 6's. It's overpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lpitn Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blamonchesix Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 These kind of monsters do exist.To name a few... "Chainsaw Insect" "Armor EXE" "Rare Metal Dragon" Your card seems to be fair. (^_^) 9.5/10. Good Job. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.