Parting Shot Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 [align=center]I haven't made any cards in far too long, so I decided to change that ;). Here's my first card of 2010. Basic, yet useful (I think :P). Effect: This card is also treated as Machine-Type. Once per turn, during your Main Phase, you can toss up to 3 coins (or up to 5 coins if this card is equipped with an Equip Card). If more results are Heads, your opponent loses 400 Life Points for each coin tossed. If more results are Tails, you lose 500 Life Points for each coin tossed. And here's another card I thought of after seeing the pic. Effect: This card cannot be destroyed by battle. Once per turn, you can place this card face-up in your opponent's Spell & Trap Card Zone as a Continuous Spell Card OR Special Summon this card in face-up Attack Position. While treated as a Spell Card, this card has the following effect: "When a Machine-Type monster in the same column as this card attacks, its ATK is doubled (during damage calculation only)." Artist Credits are in circulation areas. Comments, suggestions, etc. welcome as usual.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuerta6 Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 cool card nice effect wouldnt do very good in a competitive deck unless the deck was based on fliping coins like second coin toss, although itself as a card is pretty easy on the eye and is a very fun card to play with 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 cool card nice effect wouldnt do very good in a competitive deck unless the deck was based on fliping coins like second coin toss' date=' although itself as a card is pretty easy on the eye and is a very fun card to play with 9/10[/quote']Well, I like fun cards, so I think I succeeded with this one ;) Thanks for the comments ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuerta6 Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 still a great card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mad Hatter Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 So, if this was used with Umi... it would gain 200 ATK and DEF cuz it's a fish... then lose 200 ATK and DEF cuz it's a machine... lol. I like the pic,Good OCG,Interesting effect, (I couldn't see it in an average water deck cuz of the Umi thing, but I could see it in an equip or coin deck.)I am still laughing at the name, (Awesome name!)dare I say... 11/10... no it's a 10/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 So' date=' if this was used with Umi... it would gain 200 ATK and DEF cuz it's a fish... then lose 200 ATK and DEF cuz it's a machine... lol.[/quote']Haha, I hadn't thought of that, but I guess it does :P EDIT: Added another card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Break Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 FTW!!! Love that card very much!!awesome effect..awsome pics..15/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 even if you haven't made them for so long, I still find no OCG errors for them for the first card though I'd keep the points of the burn equal though 9.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 FTW!!! Love that card very much!!awesome effect..awsome pics..15/10Thanks! Glad you like them ^_^ even if you haven't made them for so long' date=' I still find no OCG errors for them for the first card though I'd keep the points of the burn equal though 9.8/10[/quote']Well, I do pride myself on my OCG, so I should hope it's correct :P. I'm not sure anymore why I made one burn more, so I think I'll revert to them being the same. Would 400 or 500 be better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 1st one is oh so win. 2nd is also very nice. I was gonna ask you for a 1-on-1, but now I see that my @ss would be whupped so badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 1st one is oh so win. 2nd is also very nice. I was gonna ask you for a 1-on-1' date=' but now I see that my @ss would be whupped so badly.[/quote']LOL! And these are just cards I came up with on whims while at work and tired out of my mind ;). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 ...That's just plain cruel... ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 FTW!!! Love that card very much!!awesome effect..awsome pics..15/10Thanks! Glad you like them ^_^ even if you haven't made them for so long' date=' I still find no OCG errors for them for the first card though I'd keep the points of the burn equal though 9.8/10[/quote']Well, I do pride myself on my OCG, so I should hope it's correct :P. I'm not sure anymore why I made one burn more, so I think I'll revert to them being the same. Would 400 or 500 be better? personally I feel 500 is better, but that's your call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 personally I feel 500 is better' date=' but that's your call[/quote']500 it is. Edited :P Anymore comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 First card is just like how you prefer to duel, with Luck Cards. And a very good one at that. Great card. Cybernet Striker actually brings the idea of Senet Gameplay back into the TCG and for that sole reason, I enjoy it like no other card for a while. Impressive. And Rag... Azrael did the OCG for 90% of my cards, of course he's awesome ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 First card is just like how you prefer to duel' date=' with Luck Cards. And a very good one at that. Great card. Cybernet Striker actually brings the idea of Senet Gameplay back into the TCG and for that sole reason, I enjoy it like no other card for a while. Impressive.[/quote']You know I love the luck cards ;) As for Senet, it's one of my most favorite and (in my opinion) most underappreciated themes/mechanics. I want to make a whole set of Senet cards, but the hard part will be finding pics for all of them :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 personally I feel 500 is better' date=' but that's your call[/quote']500 it is. Edited :P Anymore comments? that's more like it NOW I can raise the rate to 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Pretty nice cards,although I see some OCG stuff,i believe...9/10. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 I am in love with the first card. Never seen an effect like this before. Second one, the only thing that bothers me is: Why he cannot be destroyed by battle? He is already hard to destroy by battling (You know why he is difficult to destroy. He can avoid the attacks when it is on your opponent Spell & Trap Cards zone) Seems a useless effect, and could be OP. Anyway, loving them. Rate~ 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trev125 Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 The cards are really cool i agree with everyone elese that the cards are really good 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 Thanks for the comments everyone! does anyone else think Cybernet Striker should NOT have "Cannot be destroyed by battle." ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 >Bump> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Very effective and Simple effects.OCG is perfect.Pic's are perfect.A 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2010 >Bump> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.