making fun of gay people:::

[Dissonance]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach, then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering baka.

 

Your logic sucks.

[Zeroke]

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

 

Yes' date=' I'm sure it is the least of [i']your[/i] concerns. As a heterosexual with almost as much empathy for the rest of the human race as a piece of dirt, I'm sure that it really isn't any of your self-centered concern what happens to Those Other People.

 

Woah, retract the claws, Crab. He just thinks that there are other issues that Christianity is pushing which are more important. You can't call him self-centered for that. Maybe there are other issues that require more attention. I do not know what, so let's hear what Euroynome what he thinks.

[Dissonance]

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

 

Yes' date=' I'm sure it is the least of [i']your[/i] concerns. As a heterosexual with almost as much empathy for the rest of the human race as a piece of dirt, I'm sure that it really isn't any of your self-centered concern what happens to Those Other People.

 

Woah, retract the claws, Crab. He just thinks that there are other issues that Christianity is pushing which are more important. You can't call him self-centered for that. Maybe there are other issues that require more attention. I do not know what, so let's hear what Euroynome what he thinks.

 

More important to whom? To him, because he's not gay. So he's not persecuted for being gay. You missed the whole point of Crab Helmet's post.

[Guest]

My point was' date=' if you were to go up to someone who makes fun of gay people and ask why they do so, they most likely would not say, "Cause God hates gay people". They'd probably say something like, "He sucks dick, why else?"

 

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

[/quote']

 

Not really. Religious people have killed homosexuals many times in the past. Also, there are religious people who show up to the funerals of homosexual troops with banners that say things like "thank GOD for dead soldiers!" I'm not saying all religious people are like that, but the hating of gays by them is not a "least concern"

 

Westboro doesn't count. They're trolls.

 

Westboro is very useful as a coutnerargument to the standard Religious Right "Those evil Rainbow Nazis are trying to take away our FREEDOM!" scare propaganda. After all, since Fred Phelps hasn't been locked away with the key sent into space yet, the only "freedom" that seems to have been taken is the freedom to do even worse things that Westboro and Fred Phelps do on a daily basis. (That, and the "freedom" to live in a world where People Like You don't have the freedom to exist and be yourselves.)

[TheOnlyMe]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Why are you attacking me? I didn't mean to offend you, but when I said "religious people" I meant that group. Not all, just some. And that applies to people not part of that church too. This means that religious people in general are anti-gay based on what I've seen, read and heard.

[Zeroke]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Hey, I am an Atheist, so shut the funk up! I am nowhere near as heartless as those guys. What your saying is like saying, "Oh, a black guy killed someone, that must mean all black guys are voilent animals."

[Eury]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Hey, I am an Atheist, so shut the f*** up! I am nowhere near as heartless as those guys. What your saying is like saying, "Oh, a black guy killed someone, that must mean all black guys are voilent animals."

 

You obviously didn't understand his point. >_>

[Dissonance]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Why are you attacking me? I didn't mean to offend you, but when I said "religious people" I meant that group. Not all, just some.

 

Well the hypothetical atheist is an atheist, so he still fits my post.

 

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Hey, I am an Atheist, so shut the f*** up! I am nowhere near as heartless as those guys. What your saying is like saying, "Oh, a black guy killed someone, that must mean all black guys are voilent animals."

 

You're a funking idiot who completely missed my point.

[Zeroke]

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

 

Yes' date=' I'm sure it is the least of [i']your[/i] concerns. As a heterosexual with almost as much empathy for the rest of the human race as a piece of dirt, I'm sure that it really isn't any of your self-centered concern what happens to Those Other People.

 

Woah, retract the claws, Crab. He just thinks that there are other issues that Christianity is pushing which are more important. You can't call him self-centered for that. Maybe there are other issues that require more attention. I do not know what, so let's hear what Euroynome what he thinks.

 

More important to whom? To him, because he's not gay. So he's not persecuted for being gay. You missed the whole point of Crab Helmet's post.

 

I understood it. Having gays not being able to marry is harsh, but there COULD be other things that are important! You can't only focus on only one group of people.

[Larxene]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Hey, I am an Atheist, so shut the f*** up! I am nowhere near as heartless as those guys. What your saying is like saying, "Oh, a black guy killed someone, that must mean all black guys are voilent animals."

 

He was just making a point moron. He wasn't being serious.

[Zeroke]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Why are you attacking me? I didn't mean to offend you, but when I said "religious people" I meant that group. Not all, just some.

 

Well the hypothetical atheist is an atheist, so he still fits my post.

 

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Hey, I am an Atheist, so shut the f*** up! I am nowhere near as heartless as those guys. What your saying is like saying, "Oh, a black guy killed someone, that must mean all black guys are voilent animals."

 

You're a f***ing idiot who completely missed my point.

 

What funking point did I miss? You hardly typed anything but, "All atheist must be murderous funking douchebags!" That is pretty clear to me. You are saying that all atheists must be horrible for ONE persons actions.

Or are you saying that, without the thought of "eternal damnation" they feel they can do what they want? Is that it?

[Dissonance]

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

 

Yes' date=' I'm sure it is the least of [i']your[/i] concerns. As a heterosexual with almost as much empathy for the rest of the human race as a piece of dirt, I'm sure that it really isn't any of your self-centered concern what happens to Those Other People.

 

Woah, retract the claws, Crab. He just thinks that there are other issues that Christianity is pushing which are more important. You can't call him self-centered for that. Maybe there are other issues that require more attention. I do not know what, so let's hear what Euroynome what he thinks.

 

More important to whom? To him, because he's not gay. So he's not persecuted for being gay. You missed the whole point of Crab Helmet's post.

 

I understood it. Having gays not being able to marry is harsh, but there COULD be other things that are important! You can't only focus on only one group of people.

 

This is about the persecution of homosexuals, including harassment, verbal and physical, as well as denying them certain privileges, ie marriage.

 

Although the concept of marriage being a religious one, I think it's stupid it's a federal entity to begin with.

[Zeroke]

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Hey, I am an Atheist, so shut the f*** up! I am nowhere near as heartless as those guys. What your saying is like saying, "Oh, a black guy killed someone, that must mean all black guys are voilent animals."

 

He was just making a point moron. He wasn't being serious.

 

Alright...I'll calm down. Boy, haven't been that riled up in awhile.

[Guest]

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

 

Yes' date=' I'm sure it is the least of [i']your[/i] concerns. As a heterosexual with almost as much empathy for the rest of the human race as a piece of dirt, I'm sure that it really isn't any of your self-centered concern what happens to Those Other People.

 

Woah, retract the claws, Crab. He just thinks that there are other issues that Christianity is pushing which are more important. You can't call him self-centered for that. Maybe there are other issues that require more attention. I do not know what, so let's hear what Euroynome what he thinks.

 

More important to whom? To him, because he's not gay. So he's not persecuted for being gay. You missed the whole point of Crab Helmet's post.

 

I understood it. Having gays not being able to marry is harsh, but there COULD be other things that are important! You can't only focus on only one group of people.

 

Yes, there could be other things more important - people are being killed and tortured as a result of the Religious Right, which does appear to be worse than marriage issues. That would still be a stupid and crude diversionary tactic - the existence of greater injustices does not justify the existence of lesser injustices - but at least it would be technically true. But Eurynome didn't say that. What Eurynome said was that it was the least important thing - not that more important matters existed, but that every existing matter was more important. It's not so much "Hey, people are dying, so let's go look somewhere else!" as "Seriously, the gays don't matter, get over yourselves". This complete, sociopathic uncaring for Those Other People is downright disgusting.

 

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Why are you attacking me? I didn't mean to offend you, but when I said "religious people" I meant that group. Not all, just some.

 

Well the hypothetical atheist is an atheist, so he still fits my post.

 

If they are religious I'm afraid they fit the criteria for my post.

 

There was this atheist guy once who went around punching pregnant ladies in the stomach' date=' then he raped a 6 year old girl, and killed 32 people.

 

All atheists must be complete douchebag murdering f*****s.

 

Your logic sucks.

[/quote']

 

Hey, I am an Atheist, so shut the f*** up! I am nowhere near as heartless as those guys. What your saying is like saying, "Oh, a black guy killed someone, that must mean all black guys are voilent animals."

 

You're a f***ing idiot who completely missed my point.

 

What f***ing point did I miss? You hardly typed anything but, "All atheist must be murderous f***ing douchebags!" That is pretty clear to me. You are saying that all atheists must be horrible for ONE persons actions.

Or are you saying that, without the thought of "eternal damnation" they feel they can do what they want? Is that it?

 

The comment in question was satirizing the post to which it was responding by demonstrating how idiotic it is to generalize to an entire group from a single person, especially an outlier. Everyone else picked up on that because it was blatantly obvious. You didn't pick up on that because you're a moron who just comes on here to mindlessly scream at people. Now, go away.

[Zeroke]

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

 

Yes' date=' I'm sure it is the least of [i']your[/i] concerns. As a heterosexual with almost as much empathy for the rest of the human race as a piece of dirt, I'm sure that it really isn't any of your self-centered concern what happens to Those Other People.

 

Woah, retract the claws, Crab. He just thinks that there are other issues that Christianity is pushing which are more important. You can't call him self-centered for that. Maybe there are other issues that require more attention. I do not know what, so let's hear what Euroynome what he thinks.

 

More important to whom? To him, because he's not gay. So he's not persecuted for being gay. You missed the whole point of Crab Helmet's post.

 

I understood it. Having gays not being able to marry is harsh, but there COULD be other things that are important! You can't only focus on only one group of people.

 

This is about the persecution of homosexuals, including harassment, verbal and physical, as well as denying them certain privileges, ie marriage.

 

Although the concept of marriage being a religious one, I think it's stupid it's a federal entity to begin with.

 

So you are saying that the idea of having to be married by a priest is a stupid way to bond two people? If so, finally something we can agree on.

[Dissonance]

And Christianity causes a lot of problems. It hating gay people is the least of our concerns.

 

Yes' date=' I'm sure it is the least of [i']your[/i] concerns. As a heterosexual with almost as much empathy for the rest of the human race as a piece of dirt, I'm sure that it really isn't any of your self-centered concern what happens to Those Other People.

 

Woah, retract the claws, Crab. He just thinks that there are other issues that Christianity is pushing which are more important. You can't call him self-centered for that. Maybe there are other issues that require more attention. I do not know what, so let's hear what Euroynome what he thinks.

 

More important to whom? To him, because he's not gay. So he's not persecuted for being gay. You missed the whole point of Crab Helmet's post.

 

I understood it. Having gays not being able to marry is harsh, but there COULD be other things that are important! You can't only focus on only one group of people.

 

This is about the persecution of homosexuals, including harassment, verbal and physical, as well as denying them certain privileges, ie marriage.

 

Although the concept of marriage being a religious one, I think it's stupid it's a federal entity to begin with.

 

So you are saying that the idea of having to be married by a priest is a stupid way to bond two people? If so, finally something we can agree on.

 

Your reading comprehension skills are truly terrible.

 

I said that it's stupid that marriage is in the realm of the government, ie, the legal documentation should be under a different name.

[Zeroke]

Oh, well sor-ry!

[Guest]

Legal marriage and religious marriage are entirely different entities that people confuse because they both use the word "marriage" and because people tend to marry in both ways simultaneously. The legal institution has important legal ramifications and no religious ramifications; the religious institution has important religious ramifications and no legal ramification. I would urge those who wish to participate in this discussion to learn the difference between the legal union with economic effects and the religious union with spiritual effects, and would urge those who wish to speak without acquiring this knowledge to stop babbling.

[Dissonance]

Legal marriage and religious marriage are entirely different entities that people confuse because they both use the word "marriage" and because people tend to marry in both ways simultaneously. The legal institution has important legal ramifications and no religious ramifications; the religious institution has important religious ramifications and no legal ramification. I would urge those who wish to participate in this discussion to learn the difference between the legal union with economic effects and the religious union with spiritual effects' date=' and would urge those who wish to speak without acquiring this knowledge to stop babbling.

[/quote']

 

My my, someone has a sharp tongue.

 

But the entire problems stems from the fact that they are named the same thing. Christians tend to flip the sheet when they hear about "gay marriage", even though it refers to the legal sense. The fact is that they've become intertwined. You're not "really" married until it's been stamped with government approval.

[Guest]

My my' date=' someone has a sharp tongue.

[/quote']

 

Hi, I'm Crab Helmet. Nice to meet you. ^_^

 

But the entire problems stems from the fact that they are named the same thing. Christians tend to flip the s*** when they hear about "gay marriage"' date=' even though it refers to the legal sense. The fact is that they've become intertwined. You're not "really" married until it's been stamped with government approval.

[/quote']

 

The word "marriage" does not refer purely to any sort of union between two people; the term has all sorts of other meanings as well, of which one happens to be the most common. Since it isn't a strictly religious word, there isn't anything wrong with the government using the name. The only problem is that it's easy for the Religious Right to put up scare campaigns falsely claiming that gay marriage would force churches to marry gay couples and the like. Unfortunately, changing the name of the term is not feasible, as that would result in the churches decrying it as persecution or some other rubbish.

[Dissonance]

My my' date=' someone has a sharp tongue.

[/quote']

 

Hi, I'm Crab Helmet. Nice to meet you. ^_^

 

 

A pleasure.

 

 

But the entire problems stems from the fact that they are named the same thing. Christians tend to flip the s*** when they hear about "gay marriage"' date=' even though it refers to the legal sense. The fact is that they've become intertwined. You're not "really" married until it's been stamped with government approval.

[/quote']

 

The word "marriage" does not refer purely to any sort of union between two people; the term has all sorts of other meanings as well, of which one happens to be the most common. Since it isn't a strictly religious word, there isn't anything wrong with the government using the name. The only problem is that it's easy for the Religious Right to put up scare campaigns falsely claiming that gay marriage would force churches to marry gay couples and the like. Unfortunately, changing the name of the term is not feasible, as that would result in the churches decrying it as persecution or some other rubbish.

 

I know it's not feasible, I also just find it rather dumb. I thought America was big on everyone getting their rights and whatnot.

[Blue Lightning]

As, a christian, I honestly think LEGAL gay marriage should be legal. I watched a story of a gay couple, and when one had a heart attack, they wouldnt let him in because he wasnt related or a spouse. Allowing legal gay marriage should take care of that.

 

Now, the church marriage, yeah the church should figure it out without the government.

[Guest JoshIcy]

Same reason you insult others for any other generalist reason. Everything else is left up to the person.