asdasdel Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 asdhjgygahgdahadgfhdafghdafh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asdasdel Posted February 5, 2010 Author Share Posted February 5, 2010 · Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given i am waiting for comments and ratings :s Link to comment
The-Wick! Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 i think they do are useful, but you misspeled some OCG gramar, ill put here the ones i know how to correct:"places" should be Special Summon, you don't have to say in his/her control because is alredy is HIS-HER SIDE OF THE FIELD, DARH!!! an you should retire "(face-up)" you can rearenge this sentence: "...and Special Summon in his/her side of the field in face-up Defense position." . same to the other one. the first card is really oped, you should put at least a limit for how much the monster can gain. i think you can work harder. 6.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asdasdel Posted February 5, 2010 Author Share Posted February 5, 2010 · Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given i think they do are useful' date=' but you misspeled some OCG gramar, ill put here the ones i know how to correct:"places" should be Special Summon, you don't have to say in his/her control because is alredy is HIS-HER SIDE OF THE FIELD, DARH!!! an you should retire "(face-up)" you can rearenge this sentence: "...and Special Summon in his/her side of the field in face-up Defense position." . same to the other one. the first card is really oped, you should put at least a limit for how much the monster can gain. i think you can work harder. 6.9/10[/quote'] thanks for comment. i fixed the ocg errors that you noticed (: Link to comment
Sp1at Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 negate the destruction? you mean negate the attackthen "When a monster on the field is destroyed" should be "When a face-up monster on your side of the field is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard by Battle."life points=Life Pointsand lastly where you said "your opponent selects 1 six or less level monster" it should be " your opponent selects 1 Level 6 or less monster from his/her deck" thats it. There very nice cards but you should add more supports for your Normal Monster. for now my rate is 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 for a new member, the OCG errors are mostly limited to just some capitalization problems, so that's very good A shame the only monster you have is a vanilla though, I wish you put an effect monster here 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asdasdel Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 · Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given negate the destruction? you mean negate the attackthen "When a monster on the field is destroyed" should be "When a face-up monster on your side of the field is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard by Battle."life points=Life Pointsand lastly where you said "your opponent selects 1 six or less level monster" it should be " your opponent selects 1 Level 6 or less monster from his/her deck"thats it. There very nice cards but you should add more supports for your Normal Monster. for now my rate is 7.5/10i fixed the ocg errors. thanks for notice them (: and thanks for ratinglife points > Life Pointsdestroyed' date='destruction > attacked,attack1 monster that is level six or more > 1 Level 6 or more monster1 monster that is level six or less > 1 Level 6 or less monster for a new member, the OCG errors are mostly limited to just some capitalization problems, so that's very good A shame the only monster you have is a vanilla though, I wish you put an effect monster here 8/10thanks for suggestion and rating (: i will consider your suggestion and try to add new cards. (: Link to comment
asdasdel Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 · Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given Hidden by asdasdel, March 14, 2011 - No reason given i have added another card. please comment Link to comment
:^) Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 eww a vanilla with no effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asdasdel Posted February 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 i made these cards randomly. every monster must have a effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Monsters don't need effects. They just need a point. The Normal Monster here has no point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asdasdel Posted February 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 ok then (: rate the others? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:^) Posted February 7, 2010 Report Share Posted February 7, 2010 There should be effect monsters. A Vanilla on its own shows Lazyness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.