Ayasato-chan Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 I gave one of my favorite monsters from S1 a remake. I made him a Toon, as he should have been. [align=center] Card Lore: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned while "Toon World" is on your side of the field. You can Special Summon this monster from your hand, but Tributes are required for monsters Level 5 or more. When "Toon World" is destroyed, this card is also destroyed. If your opponent doesn't control a Toon monster, this card can attack your opponent's Life Points directly. If a face-up Toon Monster is on your opponent's field, you must select the Toon Monster as an attack target. During an End Phase where this card attacked your opponent directly, you can switch this card into Defense Position. Once during your opponent's Battle Phase, you can pay 500 Life Points to negate the attack of one face-up monster on your opponent's field. Increase the DEF of this card by 300 for each unoccupied Monster Card Zone on your opponent's field[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 A little UP because of it's stats, and for being a Toon , it could be a little more powered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayasato-chan Posted February 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Well, the stats are exactly the same from the original card. Have any suggestions for the effect then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Maybe removing the part where it is changed to Defense Position could make it better. There are Toon monsters that can attack direct and with a higher ATK than this one that doesn't change to Defense Position when attacks. This way it could be good, but the effect will stay very simple thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayasato-chan Posted February 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Ah. Okay. I didn't mean it as an inhibitor, It was a defense mechanism for the card itself. (I'll reword it.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.