Jump to content

Code Geass Set (Update: Jeremiah Gottwald cards!!!) *accepting requests*


Santa Orc

Recommended Posts

lol did u informed urself about Code Geass before u made the cards ?

 

Core Luminous = Sacuradite Engine

Lotus Wings = Energy Wing System

 

ect.

 

Make F.L.E.I.J.A Warhead and Damocles next ^^

 

Well' date=' I did look some stuff up to get facts and pics... I'm not sure what you're tryin to say, but I intentionally called them that on the cards because it sounded more dramatic/cooler. As for the Lotus Wings, about 50% is real:

http://codegeass.wikia.com/wiki/Guren_S.E.I.T.E.N._Eight_Elements

I just named the Lancelot Albion's "power" the Emerald Lotus Aura because it seemed like the counterpart of the Guren's. Both "Lotus Aura" cards can be played on any monster with any Knightmare Frame, not just Suzaku and Kallen, because I wanted the cards to be more useable. And, lol, I already made Damocles and the F.L.E.I.J.A. a while ago; I've just been waiting for a good time to reveal them. I'm not sure about the OCG on them, though.

 

btw, ty Super Saiya-jin for the fix.

 

ok I take that back with Sacuradite but even there it is called "Energy Wing" .... so I dont get why u named it Lotus Aura ? Even "Energy Wings" cant be redirected to Code Geass. You can attack them to ANY Machine-Type Monster and its ok

 

Well, the "aura" part comes from the colored "circles" of red/green light reminiscent of "auras" around the guren/lancelot respectively. "Lotus" comes from the link I posted; The Eight Elements is also called "Crimson Lotus...[etc.]"

As for why they seem vague and not connected to the "Code Geass archetype," well, could you tell me what archetype the real card "Dramatic Rescue" comes from? It comes from the Amazoness archetype, believe it or not, and there is nothing "Amazonessy" about the name. Really, it all comes down to "artistic license" and what sounded right to me. Good question though. If you want the details on my ideas you can pm me.

 

Update: I am now working on Jeremiah Gottwald and his support/evolutions. Shouldn't be too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Geass in this set is built into the effect of the card; ex: Lelouch(s) effect can take control of monsters permanently...etc.

So, first off, Jeremiah will origionally be a basic soldier-like monster, then he can evolve into "Orange" and get stronger stats and probably be immune to monster effects or something, since he is both a cyborg and has the Geass Canceller.

If I were to confine Geass to Trap cards, then 1) I would have to make them continuous to replicate a geass-user's ability to use geass multiple times, 2) If they were continuous, then they would take up space that should be used for Knightmare Frames. I just prefer to keep them as effects and give "Orange-kun" the ability to negate them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes more sense for C.C.'s effect to not have the "This card cannot be destroyed by battle." part IMO. Reasoning, she does die, she just comes back, hence, Special Summoning it back to the field during your End Phase.

 

When this card is Summoned, it is changed to Defense Position. If you control a monster with "Lelouch" in its name, this card gains the following effect(s):

* When your opponent designates a "Lelouch" you control as a target of a Spell, Trap, or attack, switch the target to this card. When this face-up card is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard, Special Summon this card from your Graveyard during the End Phase.

 

Alternatively with the OCG - You can express it as under your control/under your opponent's control - or you control/your opponent controls.

 

I've seen it on cards both ways.

 

Edit: The reason I have the additional effect only for the "Lelouch" card is because, when he is acting as Zero or when he becomes the Emporer, C.C. doesn't seem to physically protect him except for on one occasion, and that wasn't necessarily on his behalf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thx a lot, it makes more sense now, but at the cost of reducing her practical usefulness significantly... I added the "Control of this card cannot switch" part because I just can't imagine her succumbing to Brain Control/Mind Control/Enemy Controller despite the fact that she is only known to be immune to Geass.

 

Also, out of curiosity, could you tell me if I got Damocles and Jeremiah of Britannia right? They had trickier effects that I hadn't really seen before. ty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremiah is fine.

 

Damocles OCG Fix

This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card cannot be chosen as a attack target by a monster whose Level equals 7 or lower. When this card is Tribute Summoned, it is changed to Defense Position. Once per turn, you can discard 1 card to add 1 "F.L.E.I.J.A" from your Deck to your hand. If you control this card, all "F.L.E.I.J.A." cards you control inherit the following effect.

* Destroy all face-up monsters your opponent controls. If there is a face-up Field Spell Card on the field, destroy it.

 

 

EditEdit: Also, I would remove F.L.E.I.J.A.'s effect, because otherwise the extra effect on Damocles is useless.

 

This card cannot be activated unless you control a "Damocles" in face-up Attack Position.

 

And the rest of its effect is inherited from Damocles.

 

I made it so, that it could only be activated while Damocles is in Attack Position so that not only would this make add a negative to the card to push back on Damocles extremely high defense and this spells added destructive effect, this would make it more like the show, as in, Damocles had to drop its shield to fire F.L.E.I.J.A. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremiah is fine.

 

Damocles OCG Fix

This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card cannot be chosen as a attack target by a monster whose Level equals 7 or lower. When this card is Tribute Summoned' date=' it is changed to Defense Position. Once per turn, you can discard 1 card to add 1 "F.L.E.I.J.A" from your Deck to your hand. If you control this card, all "F.L.E.I.J.A." cards you control inherit the following effect.

* Destroy all face-up monsters your opponent controls. If there is a face-up Field Spell Card on the field, destroy it.

 

 

EditEdit: Also, I would remove F.L.E.I.J.A.'s effect, because otherwise the extra effect on Damocles is useless.

 

This card cannot be activated unless you control a "Damocles" in face-up Attack Position.

 

And the rest of its effect is inherited from Damocles.

 

I made it so, that it could only be activated while Damocles is in Attack Position so that not only would this make add a negative to the card to push back on Damocles extremely high defense and this spells added destructive effect, this would make it more like the show, as in, Damocles had to drop its shield to fire F.L.E.I.J.A. .

[/quote']

 

hmm... maybe it's not the same here, but I was informed fairly recently that "Tribute Summoning" is just a type of Normal Summon, so all you need to say is "Normal Summon."

 

Also, for your "EditEdit:" statement, I'm not totally sure what you mean, but "F.L.E.I.J.A." destroys all face-up monsters, while Damocles allows for only your opponent's face-up monsters to be destroyed; essentially a Lightning Vortex. Plus, Suzaku launched a FLEIJA with just his Lancelot one time and didn't need Damocles...

 

About the Attack Position switch... sounds good. but I think I thought of another way... ...ok, I changed Damocles. How is it now? I think it'll work; however, I'm not so sure about the quote-in-quote " 'Sky Fortress Damocles' " thing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever told you Normal Summon and Tribute Summon were the same thing were completely wrong. A Normal Summon is basically Summoning a card without having to activate any spells/make any tributes to do so (Usually level 4 cards and lower, although some cards effects can say otherwise) and putting it in Attack Position. A set is basically the same thing but you're putting it in Defense Position, face-down or face-up. A Tribute Summon is a monster which you had to offer other cards and send them to the graveyard to summon it, like a level 5 monster requires 1 tribute. This doesn't include Ritual or Synchro monsters though.

 

Yeah I know Suzaku fired F.L.E.I.J.A. with Lancelot, but I thought considering the way Lancelot and Suzaku's effects have nothing to do with F.L.E.I.J.A.'s , and Sky Fortress actually giving it an additional effect, that you were trying to fit the card within the scenario of the F.L.E.I.J.A.'s that were put inside Damocles. Since you want it to deal with both, you could make it so that it cannot be activated unless you control a "Suzaku - Major" or "Sky Fortress Damocles" in face-up Attack Position. Then have add to the Majors effects that all F.L.E.I.J.A.'s inherit so-and-so effect. Something like, destroys all face-down monsters your opponent controls, and then Damocles destroys face-up ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever told you Normal Summon and Tribute Summon were the same thing were completely wrong. A Normal Summon is basically Summoning a card without having to activate any spells/make any tributes to do so (Usually level 4 cards and lower' date=' although some cards effects can say otherwise) and putting it in Attack Position. A set is basically the same thing but you're putting it in Defense Position, face-down or face-up. A Tribute Summon is a monster which you had to offer other cards and send them to the graveyard to summon it, like a level 5 monster requires 1 tribute. This doesn't include Ritual or Synchro monsters though.

 

Yeah I know Suzaku fired F.L.E.I.J.A. with Lancelot, but I thought considering the way Lancelot and Suzaku's effects have nothing to do with F.L.E.I.J.A.'s , and Sky Fortress actually giving it an additional effect, that you were trying to fit the card within the scenario of the F.L.E.I.J.A.'s that were put inside Damocles. Since you want it to deal with both, you could make it so that it cannot be activated unless you control a "Suzaku - Major" or "Sky Fortress Damocles" in face-up Attack Position. Then have add to the Majors effects that all F.L.E.I.J.A.'s inherit so-and-so effect. Something like, destroys all face-down monsters your opponent controls, and then Damocles destroys face-up ones.

[/quote']

 

Now, I am a veteran yugioh player, so I am very well aware what the different types of summoning are. Check this link:

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Normal_Summon

it says that "Tribute Summoning is still considered Normal Summoning".

 

As for Suzaku, I think that his card, being akin to a LV monster, would be made too complex if I were to add an additional effect to it, regardless of the loss of accuracy with the show. Fortunately, "Suzaku - Major" is immune to spell cards, meaning that he will survive any F.L.E.I.J.A. his controller were to activate and all face-ups will die except him; something similar to what happened on the show. ty for the opinion though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...