iGrowlithe Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Ok. So there is no color to them, but it still works. Enjoy. ----- Updated ------- OMG COLOR AND MORE TO COME :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bakupenguin Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 not bad, add color, good OCG. deck --->Deck 8/10 u get a rep cause you need more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaosIncarn Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Points for doing your own artwork. Add some color to em 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrid97 Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 nice cards, and u know what u can do, u color them and instead of blank it would be couloured and it either increases ur LP or decrease your oppenents LP. and theeres this card that decreases ur oppenents LP instead of increasing it so if u had that card in this deck it would be good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecross Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 not bad' date=' add color, good OCG. deck --->Deck 8/10 u get a rep cause you need more.[/quote']ummm i believe they're called BLANK warriors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrowlithe Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 nice cards' date=' and u know what u can do, u color them and instead of blank it would be couloured and it either increases ur LP or decrease your oppenents LP. and theeres this card that decreases ur oppenents LP instead of increasing it so if u had that card in this deck it would be good[/quote'] Your thinking of 'Bad Reaction To Simochi' Yeah. Kinda what they are built for.^ ^I know the cards dont have color. I dont have photoshop and I dont like to color them with marker or colored pencils. Makes the art look dengy. ^ ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Raiden Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Hey, I'm Raiden. I've been lurking here for a few weeks and I decided to make an account. I've lurked enough to understand the rules, and I'm not here to troll or flame anyone. I didn't see a "first post" thread so I thought I would jump right in. Sintisto and Beelzebub are way OP. This isn't a flame; I am a judge and a very experienced player of the TCG (started when it came out, haven't stopped yet, get high places in tourneys, etc.), and if these cards were real, everyone would be running them. In most duels, life points only matter when they are gone, and these guys are so good that not only would they be nuts with Reficule/Simochi burn, but they would be splashed as tech cards into almost any deck. Beelzebub is basically a super Upstart Goblin, and all you would need to do is run battle faders, necro gardnas, threatening roars, and the like to protect him and draw tons of cards. Sintisto is even crazier; you could special summon plaguespreader zombie and synchro into brionac and then return a bunch of cards and attack directly, making the lifepoints you gave your opponent a net loss. Playability/Balance: 7/10. Good. Too good. Make the mentioned cards riskier to play, or restrict the kinds of monsters Stintisto can summon. Otherwise, cool. As for the creative portion of these cards, do what you want, since they belong to you, and what I say ultimately doesn't matter but I would like to comment on them if I may. The card themes are okay, but kind of strange. Konami usually makes fiends, fairies, psychics, and machines the cards that do stuff with LP. I suggest considering a change to their type, and perhaps their names to better illustrate their abilities and overall flavor. The pictures are very well drawn; I am very good at drawing monsters, aliens, machines, and animals, but fail miserably when it comes to drawing anything resembling a human, so kudos to you. The thing that bugs me about it is the style. Don't take this offensively, but I really dislike furries, and I've already seen pcitures like these many times. They also really don't look very much like yu-gi-oh monsters. There are humanoid animals in yu-gi-oh, but most of them look slightly more believable. 7/10 Average: 7.0/10 Final Comment: Very powerful cards. I would use them if they had a less generic theme and they didn't look so...furry.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 The longest F@cking Rate Ever!^^^ Great Self drawns. Keep at it. There kinda op'd And my reason are for the above post. Overall not bad really. 7.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrowlithe Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Holy crap. That was a detailed comment o .o Im scared to post anything if that means hell be rating them :OLike a yugioh god came in and passed judgement on my cards. BANISHED!!! xDha ha. Well I guess the reason they are OP is the reason that I made them that way.I wanted to make cards that would seem useless in a sence but combined with the right cards would make them banned if ever put into circulation. *cough cough rescue cat cough cough* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Merciful Idiot Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Download Gimp. It's the same as Photoshop but is free. Search it on www.google.com Anyway, I'll give you 8/10 for the effects, 6/10 for the names, and 10/10 (Custom images always get this rating) for the pics. Which means 24/30 which means 8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 TBH, I think Raiden was too broad with his comment. The first one might see some play, in Decks with a lot of stall, but is otherwise just alright IMO. (And it doesn't work with Battle Fader) Especially since few Decks want to dedicate that much to a draw engine which runs over multiple turns and is vulnerable.The second is Underpowered as a whole, other beaters do it better. Even Simo burn would probably rather a different card.The third is problematic, it's far too easy to search some monsters and to make instant synchros.The fourth clearly just says "enjoy the Bad Reaction Deck you're running," it's useless elsewhere. Overall, the first is fine IMO, the second and fourth are UP'd, and the third is OP'd. The main problem, other than the third, is their interactions with Bad Reaction, which I don't believe are beyond acceptable. Just fix the third card and this should be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDevil27 Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Good job. Nice effects ( kind off :P ) , good OCG, you can add colour to them they will look much better 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack kenna Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 :D:D:Dlove it man keep the good work up:D:D:D8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Raiden Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 The first one might see some play' date=' in Decks with a lot of stall, but is otherwise just alright IMO. (And it doesn't work with Battle Fader) Especially since few Decks want to dedicate that much to a draw engine which runs over multiple turns and is vulnerable.The second is Underpowered as a whole, other beaters do it better. Even Simo burn would probably rather a different card.The third is problematic, it's far too easy to search some monsters and to make instant synchros.[/quote'] My mistake about fader, I forgot it was just direct attacks. I think the first one is still decent for stall decks, but I was in a hurry when I wrote that and I forgot that using those stall cards would still be -1, so every turn with one out would be a 0 in card advantage (if you could protect him for that long). He also doesn't do anything besides that, so I guess he isn't OP after all. After rereading my post I realize I was much broader in my comment than I intended to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrowlithe Posted February 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 o .oWho knew my cards would get this much attention xD Um...thanks to all that posted. I still realize I dont have color. = =" You can stop badgering me about that. I dont see how the last and second card can be used in anything other than a Bad Reaction deck. I admit the first card is great to keep the card advantage to yourself, but with such weak ATK its only useful in a stall deck in my eyes. Im kinda an amateur duelist I guess. I focus more on attacking and filling the field with monsters to guarantee my victory. Anyway, I guess I can change the third card to make it more...appropriate for this set. That way the Special Summon process of it is less....vague. Hows that sound all ye whom oppose it? > >HERE IS THE EDITED VERSION ON THE DREADED THIRD CARD. RENDERED ALMOST USELESS NOW. > > Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Rendered almost useless now? One for One is limited, and that isn't used to get Synchro Material very often. Subsitoad, XXaber-R, Mind Master and others would all like a word with the idea of "Almost useless." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 /\ If the summoned monster cannot be used for a synchro summon then the card is usless which means im taking a -1 from the rate.The cards seem balanced and really nice pics. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Nice art, add some color to it and you're fine.The effects are pretty bad.OCG could be better.A 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrowlithe Posted February 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Nice art' date=' add some color to it and you're fine.The effects are pretty bad.OCG could be better.A 8/10[/quote']Again I say. I know that there is no color. I perpously did not put color. I said earlier why I didnt put color. Seriously people. Stop saying that - - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kira179 Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 I guess people dont look at the comments of other people before they comment. I really like the pictured because i suck at drawing humanoid things at all, so great job on doing that. I am also an amature duelist, so i think that these cards would come in handy. I'll give you a 10/10 for art, 10/10 for originality, and a 9/10 for the cards themselves. ^_^ ( Not a hard grader =P) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrowlithe Posted February 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 Thank you for all the help guys :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 a shame most of them have no color to it there's capitalization errors though, and all of the effects are too simple give them more effects 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrowlithe Posted February 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 o________x Too simple? I respect your rating skills Rag, but have you read the post posted by that judge guy :O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 Rag rates a lot, but he makes a lot of mistakes. I question if he's ever played at even a tier 3 level when it comes to Deck building, from his balance comments. He doesn't ever seem to cite TCG or OCG cards. He often says things are too simple, when simple is often better. Rag puts a lot of effort into commenting on EVERYTHING, and can make decent comments on OCG or pictures, but don't put too much weight onto his words when he recommends changing the effect or other balancing factors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iGrowlithe Posted February 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2010 Rating a player on my card forum? Is that legal O> olol. Either way. I still need more opinons on these cards. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.