SHINI [THE CHAOS] Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 [align=center] Quickie.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 There are spelling and Grammar errors throughout the card, good without those errors though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHINI [THE CHAOS] Posted December 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 Thanks DJ, what would you rate it if I got rid of the errors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 Most likly an 8.5/10 ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 Whoa. Unbelievable card...Where'd you get the pic? Its perfect... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 Good pic and effect. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHINI [THE CHAOS] Posted December 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 Thanks Prof Cobra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 21, 2007 Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 I don't get it...so if the atk is negated he gains 100 ATK and loses 200??? Everyone would negate it. And his DEF would be 0 why? Nice picture and idea-i just think you got atk and def mixed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHINI [THE CHAOS] Posted December 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 What I meant was that if it didn't successfully attack this turn. Cause if it's negated its an unsuccessful attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 21, 2007 Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 no no. that's not what i meant. "increase this card's atk by 100 and decrease it's atk by 200." does that make sense to you? cuz im lost >.< lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Instinct Posted December 21, 2007 Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 hmm, i think you meant, "increase this card's ATK by 100 and decrease it's DEF by 200.." i like the idea of the effect so 4.5/5good job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.