Karasu Akakawa Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 New Cloudian idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Break Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 may=canone=1pic no BG << badeffect not ballanced..OP'dno drawback..5/10try again.. :] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 oh I don't care for lack of backgrounds 3500 atk and no specific summoning requirement makes it OPed right off the bat that you didn't put a single drawback in the text makes it worse 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 3500 atk and no specific summoning requirement makes it OPed right off the bat that you didn't put a single drawback in the text makes it worse #1 - no it doesn't. Thunder is fairly un-supported and lolATK doesn't break things at such mediocre levels. It's bad ethic' date=' but it's not OP'd. #2 - Things don't always need drawbacks, the only drawback this would deserve is the standard Cloudian def. position clause, which it doesn't [u']need[/u] As it is, it's a reasonable beatsick in Cloudians which is a +0, but good with used Cloudians if you lack Fog Control/Squall/Dragon and with Smoke Ball. Because of the Type/Attribute not matching Cloudians, it misses enough support that I wouldn't call it too powerful, and it also misses Trade-In, which is positive in the case of something with such ATK. Makes Smoke Ball Spam even happier, but doesn't seem to stick with Cloudian's control aspect as much as I feel it should, for theme's sake - instead making it a bit more beatdown-y. I personally don't like it, because it doesn't seem very much like a Cloudian, but it does what it was designed to do reasonably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted February 20, 2010 Report Share Posted February 20, 2010 3500 atk and no specific summoning requirement makes it OPed right off the bat that you didn't put a single drawback in the text makes it worse #1 - no it doesn't. Thunder is fairly un-supported and lolATK doesn't break things at such mediocre levels. It's bad ethic' date=' but it's not OP'd. #2 - Things don't always need drawbacks, the only drawback this would deserve is the standard Cloudian def. position clause, which it doesn't [u']need[/u] As it is, it's a reasonable beatsick in Cloudians which is a +0, but good with used Cloudians if you lack Fog Control/Squall/Dragon and with Smoke Ball. Because of the Type/Attribute not matching Cloudians, it misses enough support that I wouldn't call it too powerful, and it also misses Trade-In, which is positive in the case of something with such ATK. Makes Smoke Ball Spam even happier, but doesn't seem to stick with Cloudian's control aspect as much as I feel it should, for theme's sake - instead making it a bit more beatdown-y. I personally don't like it, because it doesn't seem very much like a Cloudian, but it does what it was designed to do reasonably. I'm gonna have to disagree with you. 3500 ATK without a summoning condition or a drawback IS overpowered. Take a look at Ultimate Obedient Fiend. Oh, and it destroys cards when it comes out? Yeah, I'm gonna have to say overpowered BIG TIME! Thanks for playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karasu Akakawa Posted February 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2010 I added a draw back. Even if it is a beat stick your opponent can't take more than 500 points of damage fighting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animetorr Posted February 25, 2010 Report Share Posted February 25, 2010 I added a draw back. Even if it is a beat stick your opponent can't take more than 500 points of damage fighting it. I was just going to say this lol. Pretty nice card, definitely handy with Cloudians. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDevil27 Posted February 25, 2010 Report Share Posted February 25, 2010 bad picOCG errorsoverpowered 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.