[Zeaux] Falco Punch! lol

[Zeaux]

[align=center]Falco Punch

 

Quick-Play Spell Card

 

 

-Card Effect-

 

Destroy 1 monster you control and 1 monster your opponent controls. Inflict damage to both players equal to the combined Level of the destroyed monsters x100.[/align]

[Jolta]

Very good against Meta Decks... And Decks that focus on Summoning their Ultimate Level 12.

 

9/10

[六兆年と一夜物語]

I'd enjoy if you'd use C®aptain Falcon, but the image's fine.

 

Imagine you use WDoR's LP effect, then your opponent uses this card. That would really suck.

 

10/10.

[Ghost Ryder]

[align=center]Falco Punch

 

Quick-Play Spell Card

 

 

-Card Effect-

 

Destroy 1 monster you control and 1 monster your opponent controls. Inflict damage to either players equal to the combined Level of the destroyed monsters x100.[/align]

 

Er...that's it. Good card by the way, lolnamez. The image is also pretty good, 8.8/10

[Zeaux]

Thanks peoples.

[Ghost Ryder]

Thanks peoples.

You can call us members you know. There could be members that are animals.

[Zeaux]

I don't get what you mean with that. lol

 

It is a habit say "Thanks peoples".

[zink]

Great card. 9/10. I like it. You're an amazing YCM Creator. ^^

 

Just like me, hahaha

[Zeaux]

We all are Zink. hahahaha =D

[chrid97]

i like it, its great as usual and wouldnt be both?

 

10/10

[Zeaux]

No. New OCG says that is either instead of both.

 

Thanks for the perfect rate dude. =)

[Dranzer]

I loled at this.

 

9/10

[Ghost Ryder]

I thought either players was like for 1 duelist if they could not do something required in a card effect.

[Zeaux]

I unsure about this, but I am almost right that you should use either instead of both.

 

@ĐŕANZĔŔ™: Me too. lol

Thank you for the comment.

[Guest Zeonark]

I came in here expecting Captain Falcon.

 

Anyway, seems interesting. Would work in decks that require you to have a smaller amount of Life Points. Like Skill Drain + Megamorph. Even though you're not taking a huge chunk out of your Life Points.

 

It's nice to me.

[Ghost Ryder]

I unsure about this' date=' but I am almost right that you should use either instead of both.

 

@ĐŕANZĔŔ™: Me too. lol

Thank you for the comment.

[/quote']

I use both (as in both those selections of OCG - either player and both players in card effects). I still think both can be used as well.

[Zeaux]

I came in here expecting Captain Falcon.

 

Anyway' date=' seems interesting. Would work in decks that require you to have a smaller amount of Life Points. Like Skill Drain + Megamorph. Even though you're not taking a huge chunk out of your Life Points.

 

It's nice to me.

[/quote']

 

In a really, I wasn't trying to do something to him, cause I don't even know who is that person. lol

 

@Ghost Ryder: I know, and I said before: Either is just the new OCG. Both can be used to too, but I do prefer use the new OCG.

[ragnarok1945]

well the pic was not as hilarious as I thought the thread suggested

 

I'm unsure on the burn. I still prefer Ring of Destruction (wish they hadn't banned it)

 

9/10

[Where are my COOKIES]

Good card.

 

9.5-10

[Zeaux]

Thanks peoples.

[Yankee]

To tell the truth,

This card is overpowered.

The simple words "to either player" completely kills any balance that was put in this card.

I was set to post saying this was good, but I read it again..

Not only do you get to destroy a beater your opponent controls, while losing one you have, you can choose to make your opponent lose all the LP, which, would be about the only good decision to make.

Also, you messed up, you forgot to put "Life Points" in the effect, lol

"Inflict damage to either players equal.."

 

lolwut?

[Zeaux]

To either players = both players

Me and my opponent. Why inflicting damage to me is over powered?

 

And what Life Points? lol

I said inflict damage to either players = both players lose Life Points.

I think this is the Life Points you meaning right?

 

I think you misread everything. This is probably under powered, but over powered never. There are better cards that destroy monsters your opponent controls, and you doesn't to destroy 1 of your monsters. The burn effect was just a plus to make it a little more powerful, but still not over powered because you take the damage too. Me thinks it under powered, and I am the creator of the card.

[Yankee]

To either players = both players

Me and my opponent. Why inflicting damage to me is over powered?

 

And what Life Points? lol

I said inflict damage to either players = both players lose Life Points.

I think this is the Life Points you meaning right?

 

I think you misread everything. This is probably under powered' date=' but over powered never. There are better cards that destroy monsters your opponent controls, and you doesn't to destroy 1 of your monsters. The burn effect was just a plus to make it a little more powerful, but still not over powered because you take the damage too. Me thinks it under powered, and I am the creator of the card.

[/quote']

 

Either does not mean both -.-

It means one or the other.

[Zeaux]

Whatever, just use both instead of either and you will get the point of the card.

[Yankee]

Yes...

BUT the card says either...DX