[JG] Don't. Say. Anything. Just read the ENTIRE first post before commenting. [JG]

[JG.]

[align=center]

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by Tributing 2 or more of your opponents monsters. Decrease the ATK of this card by 2000 for each monster Tributed. If the ATK of this card would go into negative numbers, decrease your Life Points by the same amount that would have been decreased from the ATK.

 

1.) Don't ask why I returned. But I just felt like I had... Let's call it unfinished buisness. Oh, and I felt like I was failing my friends. I hate doing that.

2.) Everything you need to know was exaplined in 1.) So don't ask anymore about my return.

3.) I meant what I was saying in 2.). So don't tempt me.

4.) Comment on the card. Simple, yet IMO, sorta balanced.[/align]

[animetorr]

Very handy! Maybe you should limit the number of monsters you can tribute to 3.. 10/10

[gustavosuarez]

great and interesting card:) i dont ask why you go out and come back, because im go out for a month and i dont know nothing of the last movements of YCM:( but, i dotn need to know:) excellent card, i like it and i can use it with a lot of combos:) 9.2/10

[JG.]

Thanks guys ;D

[ragnarok1945]

opponents should be opponent's (grammar error you got there)

 

negative numbers, now that's something I usually don't see everyday, so I consider that effect quite unique.

 

For some reason the picture reminds me a little of Relinquished, although Relinquished looked a lot fatter

 

9.4/10

[JG.]

opponents should be opponent's (grammar error you got there)

 

negative numbers' date=' now that's something I usually don't see everyday, so I consider that effect quite unique.

 

For some reason the picture reminds me a little of Relinquished, although Relinquished looked a lot fatter

 

9.4/10

[/quote']

 

The "grammar error" is actually no error, that is correct. Opponent's is only if was supposed to say things like "opponent is". Lrn2grammar. Thanks anyways.

[Cloister]

This card is easy to Summon, and I would definately use this card along with your other:

 

1. Summon this card by Tributing, lets say, 2 monsters

2. Tribute this card to Summon the Level 12 monster

3. Your opponent has no monsters, and you have an 8000 ATK monster that can destroy 2 Spell and Trap Cards.

4. You win.

 

This card is Uped on its own, but since the other card is SO strong, I would give the other card a harder Summoning condition.

 

See 1 error: opponents = opponent's

[JG.]

This card is easy to Summon' date=' and I would definately use this card along with your other:

 

1. Summon this card by Tributing, lets say, 2 monsters

2. Tribute this card to Summon the Level 12 monster

3. Your opponent has no monsters, and you have an 8000 ATK monster that can destroy 2 Spell and Trap Cards.

4. You win.

 

This card is Uped on its own, but since the other card is SO strong, I would give the other card a harder Summoning condition.

 

See 1 error: opponents = opponent's

[/quote']

 

Said error IS NOT AN ERROR GODDAMMIT. But, I think you need to reread the other card ;D

[Ayasato-chan]

Yes it is. Opponent's refers to the possessive. Your logic is flawed in that sense.

 

Although I will say that the negative number effect is extremely unique. ^-^

[Excallibur]

Takes out grammar book. The proper use of an apostrophe is used when showing possesive, conjunctions, or Accents. Opponent's is grammatically correct, since they are his/her monsters, they possess them, hence referring to a possessive, hence the required freakin apostrophe should be there. Sorry, but I hate when people are stubborn about the weirdest things. Nice card though.

 

9.6/10

[JG.]

Yes it is. Opponent's refers to the possessive. Your logic is flawed in that sense.

 

Although I will say that the negative number effect is extremely unique. ^-^

 

No... Opponent's would only be used if the sentence would be "opponent is"...

[Shocked]

Just 1 OCG errors... Very nice...

 

The effect seems Balanced. Great.

 

The pic, ummmm... great.

 

9/10

[-Griffin]

Insane "remove any two monsters and leave your opponent with a 0 ATK monster so you get a shot at their LP"

Lava Golem has the drawbacks of both giving them a BEATSTICK and NOT letting you Normal Summon the turn you use it - it would probably be broken if either of those were removed. This is like that, but removes both, and is Allurable.

---

Oh right, and it is "opponent's" the apostrophe is also needed for the possessive.

[JG.]

Insane "remove any two monsters and leave your opponent with a 0 ATK monster so you get a shot at their LP"

Lava Golem has the drawbacks of both giving them a BEATSTICK and NOT letting you Normal Summon the turn you use it - it would probably be broken if either of those were removed. This is like that' date=' but removes both, and is Allurable.[hr']

Oh right, and it is "opponent's" the apostrophe is also needed for the possessive.

 

I still do not belive you, and I will write it like this in all my cards, and I always have before too =P

[Hass Mac]

this card could work well with skill drain

9/10

[-Griffin]

You made me do this =p

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apostrophe

[JG.]

Screw you.