Skyfi Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 [align=center] "Flame Manipulator" + "Masaki the Legendary Swordsman"Once per turn when this card destroys an opponents monster by battle, increase the ATK of this card by 200. Once per turn discard one card from your hand to the graveyard to destroy one Spell or Trap card on the field. When this card is destroyed by battle, Special Summon one Level 4 or lower "Warrior" type monster from your hand.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 hm... didn't get what you wanted to do re-creating a old monster. The base idea is nice only the fact of copying a real monster. Try makiing out your own ideas next time 4.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted February 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 It's a remake idiot =/ Anybody with real CnC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 hm... didn't get what you wanted to do re-creating a old monster. The base idea is nice only the fact of copying a real monster. Try makiing out your own ideas next time 4.9/10 *Epic facepalm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Percival Cox Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Nice effect simple but good but I dont think Warrior needs quotes...8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Ryder Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 A remake is fine >=[ OCG fix - "Flame Manipulator" + "Masaki the Legendary Swordsman"Once per turn, when this card destroys an opponents monster by battle, increase the ATK of this card by 200. Once per turn, you can discard 1 card to destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card on the field. When this card is destroyed by battle, Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-Type monster from your hand. About the italic, is that meant to be when it destroys an opponent's monster by battle, it gains 200 ATK. And it doesn't do it again in the same turn right, eh, I should be able to understand the 'Once per turn' bit. It's a bit good IMO, 8.3/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Good effect. Used with the right cards you could swarm the field and kill half your opponents LP in one turn, 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon_Master Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Flames Swordsman already exist.... i know bout remakes i just think there lame it seems pointless so 4/10 -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 agreed with toon master Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazer Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Good effect. Nivce pic. 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
<}Alpha Frogodile{> Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Not bad. 7/10, 9/10 for a remake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Fusion Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Once per turn, when this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle, increase the ATK of this card by 200. Once per turn, discard 1 card from your hand to destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card on the field. When this card is destroyed by battle, Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-Type monster from your hand. hope this helps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSkullCortez Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Corrected: Once per turn, when this card destroys an opponents monster by battle, increase the ATK of this card by 200. Once per turn, discard 1 card from your hand to destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card on the field. When this card is destroyed by battle, Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-Type monster from your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted February 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 A remake is fine >=[ OCG fix - "Flame Manipulator" + "Masaki the Legendary Swordsman"Once per turn' date= when this card destroys an opponents monster by battle, increase the ATK of this card by 200. Once per turn, you can discard 1 card to destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card on the field. When this card is destroyed by battle, Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-Type monster from your hand. About the italic, is that meant to be when it destroys an opponent's monster by battle, it gains 200 ATK. And it doesn't do it again in the same turn right, eh, I should be able to understand the 'Once per turn' bit. It's a bit good IMO, 8.3/10. Once per turn' date=' when this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle, increase the ATK of this card by 200. Once per turn, discard 1 card from your hand to destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card on the field. When this card is destroyed by battle, Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-Type monster from your hand. hope this helps[/quote'] Corrected: Once per turn' date=' when this card destroys an opponents monster by battle, increase the ATK of this card by 200. Once per turn, discard 1 card from your hand to destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card on the field. When this card is destroyed by battle, Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-Type monster from your hand.[/quote'] Thank you three for some actual Cnc. Thanks alot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 The discard effect is worded so it's not optional. Was this on purpose or a mistake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 OMFG LOL!!!! AHAHAHHAHAHAThat image is sorta funnyne'way, who uses fusion anymore? Get with the future man, we got dark synchros now.6/10 dun like remakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted February 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 The discard effect is worded so it's not optional. Was this on purpose or a mistake? It was supposed to be optional. Thanks I'll fix that. OMFG LOL!!!! AHAHAHHAHAHAThat image is sorta funnyne'way' date=' who uses fusion anymore? Get with the future man, we got dark synchros now.6/10 dun like remakes.[/quote'] The biggest noob I have seen in my 2 years here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Ryder Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 That's why I put 'you can'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 OMFG LOL!!!! AHAHAHHAHAHAThat image is sorta funnyne'way' date=' who uses fusion anymore? Get with the future man, we got dark synchros now.6/10 dun like remakes.[/quote'] The biggest noob I have seen in my 2 years here. -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 graveyard should be Graveyard "warrior" type should be Warrior-Type better than nothing from the original Flame Swordsman, so I'll let it go 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.