jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 I was gonna go to realistic forum and then i noticed this!Congratz everyone! As a celebration, i made 2 Fiend Support cards! LORE:This card gains the following effects equal to the number of Fiend-type monsters in your Graveyard. ● 1 or more: The control of this card cannot be switched. ● 3 or more: This card gains 1000 ATK. ● 5 or more: Once per turn, you can negate the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect and destroy it. LORE:This card gains the following effects equal to the number of face-up Fiend-type monsters you control (Excluding this card). ● 1 or more: Increase the ATK of this card equal to the number of monsters you control x 200. ● 2 or more: This card cannot be destroyed by battle. ● 3 or more: This card cannot be destroyed by card effects. ● 4 or more: Once per turn, you can Special Summon 1 Fiend-Type monster from either player's Graveyard or your hand to your side of the field. That monster gains 1000 ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 for the first card, ABSOLUTELY PERFECT. Judment of traitor is OP'ed, is easy in a destruction fiend deck. CONGRATS EVERYONE FOR 50.000!!! 1:10/102:6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 thanks for rating ^^dun get what you mean by destuction fiend deck. first time hearing about it.It is a bit OP, but you need 3 monsters to make it undestructable. And your opponent can just take out one of your monsters. Plus, cards like lightning vortex can kill it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 destruction fiend deck is a fiend deck where you send best part of your cards to the graveyard to inflict damage, and yes, but only 3 cards are pretty easy to get in the Graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 3 cards you CONTROL (Not in graveyard, on your side of the field) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 OOOHHH. I THUNK I READ IT WAS IN THE GRAVEYARD!!! HAHAHAHAHA XD SORRY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curve Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 It's already 50,005 xD. Anyway nice cards, I like them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 Lawl, why do you think the lvl8 one doesnt have as good effects? Easy to get fiends in grave =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 ... Stacking effects. You forced it. And monsters, really? I dun like it .-. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 ... Stacking effects. You forced it. And monsters' date=' really? I dun like it .-.[/quote']... what? People please rate, dont just comment o.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 XD THATS WHAT I ALWAYS SAY HAHAHAHA XD re-rate for 2 monster: 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 ... Stacking effects. You forced it. And monsters' date=' really? I dun like it .-.[/quote']... what? People please rate, dont just comment o.o Fine, you want me to ACTUALLY rate your card(s)? I don't rate for a reason. But here you go. First card is a BASIC run of the mill, Milling and Booster Card. And to add insult to injury, there's nothing special effects except that it stacks on more cards in the grave? Generic, and the effects themselves are nothing special. 1/10 Second Card is the exact same as the first, with more protection and instead it counts monsters on the field. Most of the effects if at all will not go off, except in Raviel/Fiend Turbo. Its an alright effort, but as the first card it's just a monster which has been overdone to high hell. 2/10. Nothing special to speak of. I did as you asked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 ... Stacking effects. You forced it. And monsters' date=' really? I dun like it .-.[/quote']... what? People please rate, dont just comment o.o Fine, you want me to ACTUALLY rate your card(s)? I don't rate for a reason. But here you go. First card is a BASIC run of the mill, Milling and Booster Card. And to add insult to injury, there's nothing special effects except that it stacks on more cards in the grave? Generic, and the effects themselves are nothing special. 1/10 Second Card is the exact same as the first, with more protection and instead it counts monsters on the field. Most of the effects if at all will not go off, except in Raviel/Fiend Turbo. Its an alright effort, but as the first card it's just a monster which has been overdone to high hell. 2/10. Nothing special to speak of. I did as you asked... okay thanks for you rating o.o (Kinda harsh since you just rated on effect and brought up pretty lame reasons) to your response for the first card: Judgment dragon also requires milling with less monsters required to summon. Plus his effect is WAY better then that first card. to your response for the 2nd card: Not exactly the same. Bearly the same, just adapts the stacking effects. thats poor excuse for 8 points O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 I don't look at balance and usefulness my dear boy. I look at how you structured the effect to achieve the end result, the way and possibilities you came to with that effect. Notice how I didn't mention balance at all? It was all about the card itself? Granted, I know about Balance etc. But I do not come here looking for that, if I wanted that I would rename (or consider) this section "Unofficial New TCG Cards". But it's named Custom Cards, as in a created and idea thats held in your mind that's expressed as a YGO Card. So when people ask me to rate, I look at that and ONLY that. However when I stick to just typical non-rates I will make mention of balance and the like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 so you ate 9 points because i didnt think how this could fit in a fiend deck? You didnt really explain about your rating system Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 so you ate 9 points because i didnt think how this could fit in a fiend deck? You didnt really explain about your rating system Again you're commenting on Balance/Usefulness, despite what I said on the last post. When my "rating system" does not follow that. It follows the CREATIVITY BEHIND THE CARD! Not how it's used, or how it can be used. When I rate (please note this isn't the same as commenting for me), I don't care for that. What I care about, is how you got there. (And please note that it grows a lot faster, if you're not following a cookie cutter card design. And if I sound irritable sorry, personal stuff ._. I feel like screaming). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 Okay... I fail at creativity =( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 Not really... My rates do increase fast when they exceed 0/10 and 1/10... 2/10 is rare from me >.> You did good with the second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 okay, i think i understand... c'mon people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 2nd card is too OPed too much of a destruction effect, with too little drawbacks on the other hand the 1st is much better balanced out, though both cards' OCG looks fine 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted March 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.