rate405 Posted March 4, 2010 Report Share Posted March 4, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zainshivji Posted March 4, 2010 Report Share Posted March 4, 2010 A little too much DEF lower it to 2500 - 2700 and that should be good 7.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted March 4, 2010 Report Share Posted March 4, 2010 As the atk is low for a lvl 6, I think the def is ok as it is. You should change def to Defense in the description. Pic looks great, but this card would be better if you gave it an effect or made some support cards for it. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rate405 Posted March 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2010 As the atk is low for a lvl 6' date=' I think the def is ok as it is. You should change def to Defense in the description. Pic looks great, but this card would be better if you gave it an effect or made some support cards for it. 7/10[/quote'] Is this better?A little too much DEF lower it to 2500 - 2700 and that should be good 7.6/10 fixed it, is this better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 as with your other vanilla, it needs spell/trap support in addition, 2950 is too much def for lv6, drop it down to 2200ish 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 I see a Level 8 monster with bad stats. Look at "Blue-Eyes White Dragon". It has decent vanilla stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rate405 Posted March 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 I see a Level 8 monster with bad stats. Look at "Blue-Eyes White Dragon". It has decent vanilla stats. Idk what to do, ppl say it is too high for a lv 6, and too low for a lv 8, do I put it to lv 7 then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.