Jump to content

Expanding the Amazoness


Just Crouton

Recommended Posts

Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi

Making them swarm and anti-meta.

 

197350m.jpg

Amazoness Spirit Hunter

If this card battles a LIGHT or DARK monster, destroy that monster without applying damage calculation. If this card battles a non-LIGHT or DARK monster, destroy this card before damage calculation.

 

197350d.jpg

Amazoness Virgin

When this card is sent from the field to the Graveyard, you can Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower "Amazoness" monster from your Deck to your side of the field in face-up Attack Position.

 

197350x.jpg

Amazoness Witch

1 Tuner + 1 or more "Amazoness" non-Tuner monsters

While you control another face-up "Amazoness" monster, this card is unaffected by your opponent's Spell Cards. You can send this face-up card to the Graveyard to negate the Special Summon of 1 of your opponent monsters, and destroy it and all monsters your opponent controls.

 

197350v.jpg

Amazoness Queen Tiger

1 Tuner + 1 or more "Amazoness" non-Tuner monsters

When your opponent activates a Spell Card, you can select 1 "Amazoness" Monster from your Graveyard and Special Summon it. You can send 1 face-up "Amazoness" monster you control to the Graveyard to negate the activation of a Trap Card and destroy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ocg errors:

non-LIGHT = non LIGHT

You can send this face-up card to the Graveyard = You can Tribute this card

You can send 1 face-up "Amazoness" monster = Tribute (again)

 

The first 1 doesn't really fit in an amazoness deck. You should change its effect to suit the archetype.

The second 1 is somewhat OP considering its a tuner and can be sent to graveyard easily. I suggest you lower ATK too. 1300 isn't really for lvl2.

3rd is fine. Just raise ATK a little.

4th is perfect ^^

 

Some of these don't really look like amazoness monsters (Jungle women). Oh well =\

 

8/10 for above reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find absolutely nothing wrong with the Synchros from a technical and strategy point of view.

 

 

It's honestly not that much different from what already exist and none of those have "Once per turn" weakness. Witch is obviously Horus LV6 meets Raiou (or Fossil Dyna) on steroids, but I'm fine with that. It's just BARELY enough to be good without being really good... give or take how smart or good the duelist using them is, but that's not something one should be trying to stop. I personally find Queen Tiger to be VERY fair as it is highly dependent on your opponent's actions as well as your own ability to swarm. It's not like EITHER of the three "big" cards like it where two of them gain at least ONE resource to use their effect again each other and the third is always just eating from your Deck to use his anyway. None of them are Once per turn.

 

 

 

 

 

As for the non-Synchros, as I said in the other thread, simple, but effective, as Amazoness should be.

 

 

I guess by anti-meta, you mean to go with an "earthy" Goddess sisterhood sort of theme? No supernatural creatures allowed (see also: Buffy the Vampire Slayer).

 

 

I honestly have no technical or strategic complaints about any of the cards (and I'm extremely critical after all these years of perfecting my own card-making techniques). A GOOD Duelist will abuse anything and these are no different, but that shouldn't be put to the fault of the cards.


ocg errors:

non-LIGHT = non LIGHT

You can send this face-up card to the Graveyard = You can Tribute this card

You can send 1 face-up "Amazoness" monster = Tribute (again)

 

Sorry if this comes up as a double-post, it was not intentional; just this came before my own post, but before someone else posted.

 

 

 

None of those things you pointed out were "OCG errors" as people call it here.

 

 

He worded it exactly as he intended, "send" is NOT the same as "tribute" (or "release" for OCG players). In fact, Witch is worded almost copy-paste with "Thunder King Rai-Oh." "Send" is not "tribute" is not "remove from the field" is not "destroyed."

 

 

And "non-LIGHT" even if it was an YCM-OCG-error, it's still at least proper English. It's not YCM-OCG error regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...