Argentum Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 So I figured I'd show you guys what the new format looks like. Main Deck3 X-Saber Airbellum3 Flamvell Firedog1 Des Koala1 Summoner Monk3 Super-Nimble Mega Hamster3 Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter1 Sangan3 Flamvell Magician1 Rescue Cat 3 Book of Moon3 Rekindling1 Heavy Storm1 Brain Control1 Mystical Space Typhoon2 Pot of Avarice1 Mind Control1 Smashing Ground 1 Torrential Tribute1 Solemn Judgment1 Mirror Force1 Royal Oppression2 Bottomless Trap Hole1 Dust Tornado1 Dimensional Prison This deck is so damn powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supreme Duelist Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 I run a deck similar to this one -1 Dimension Prison+1 lightning Vortex - gives you a big jump on your opponent Nice job overall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 3 hamsters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 3 hamsters? Oh sweet newbies that don't understand the concept of consistency. Why would I not want to see a pure plus one card at three? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 3 hamsters? Oh sweet newbies that don't understand the concept of consistency. Why would I not want to see a pure plus one card at three?oh sweet newbies that don't understand what consistency is and how it functions. btw 3/3/3 is a horrible ratio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 lol silly. The ratio is - 3 Hamster - 7 Potential targets3 Firedog - 3 Potential Targets1 Cat - 7 Potential Targets3 Rekindling - 6 Potential Targets Where did you get 3/3/3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 3 Dog, 3 Magician, 3 Rekindling. Bad Ratio. Only reason I'm not being constructive is because of the your 'people are newbie' attitude. As for my fire question. Is 4 targets potentially good for 3 Hamster?? I'd hardly ever want to set a Airbellum, but sure it could work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 3 Dog' date=' 3 Magician, 3 Rekindling. Bad Ratio. Only reason I'm not being constructive is because of the your 'people are newbie' attitude. As for my fire question. Is 4 targets potentially good for 3 Hamster?? I'd hardly ever want to set a Airbellum, but sure it could work.[/quote'] When you factor milling into the equation the ratio isn't actually bad. Sure I'd never really want to grab an airbellum, but thats why we have Pot of Avarice. If you really doubt the deck we can play on YVD bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Your title is pretentious, GTFO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Your title is pretentious' date=' GTFO[/quote'] Haha funny girl is funny. So anyway. If I get on tomorrow anybody want to play against this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Your title is pretentious' date=' GTFO[/quote'] Haha funny girl is funny. So anyway. If get on tomorrow anybody want to play against this? FATALITY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 This deck would loose to anything with speed. Your too commited to the set and gbs would own you for it... so would black wings... so would monarchs... so would... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 You're a funking arsehole.Just leave, I've seen loads of decks that would 2-0 this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 You haven't been looking very hard (at all) then. This is way too slow. There isn't nearly enough mill to make 3/3/3 Flamvell work, and your trap lineup is awful. 1 Oppression, 1 Dust Tornado, and 1 D Prison? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I can't sleep so I came to check on my thread. Quick Responses and then I'm going to go try and sleep again. This deck would loose to anything with speed. Your too commited to the set and gbs would own you for it... so would black wings... so would monarchs... so would... At the greensboro regional(One of the first of the new format) There were two main decks seen in the top eight. Gladiator Beasts and variants of this thing.(They were all basically the same deck except for like 3-4 card preference differences) You say this deck loses to anything with speed yet two out of the three decks you showed me were the slowest decks of the format. Monarchs and GB live for the late game. And sadly blackwings lost a lot of speed when they took away the whirlwind and the draw. I played a lot of blackwings in that regionals' date=' they weren't ever out running me and I was running X-Sabers without the emmersblade. You're a f***ing arsehole.Just leave, I've seen loads of decks that would 2-0 this. Like what? lol Don't you love people that hop into a conversation curse out someone just because they are debating a point with someone else and then make a statement with no proof to back it up? You haven't been looking very hard (at all) then. This is way too slow. There isn't nearly enough mill to make 3/3/3 Flamvell work' date=' and your trap lineup is awful. 1 Oppression, 1 Dust Tornado, and 1 D Prison?[/quote'] Its not dependent on the mill, the mill is just a nice plus. You are talking like the firedog is a shitty card that can't run over anything. You think the trap line up is terrible? What would you suggest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Another oppression. Either neg the prison or add a second one. Neg the tornado. Go 2 Firedog/Magician and 1 Rekindling. Add a Hand Dest, (D-Prison), Trunade, MST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 its a regional, its just a bigger local, it holds as much stability in the meta as a mouse does to a hippo. Your regional just sucked. Don't think nothing of it. I don't just rant about bad decks, I test them first, and it drew horrible. Unless your cheating, this deck is about as consistant as skill drain dad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Another oppression. Either neg the prison or add a second one. Neg the tornado. Go 2 Firedog/Magician and 1 Rekindling. Add a Hand Dest' date=' (D-Prison), Trunade, MST.[/quote'] I don't see the point of doing anything in your first line. A second oppression would funk this deck up. It special summons A LOT. If I go 2 firedog/magician then I won't see it enough. Promise. The cat engine is only half of the deck my man. 1 Rekindling? Do you not realize how broke Rekindling is? Instant stardust/colossal whenever I feel like it? With NO DRAW BACK?!!? Thats like telling a Tele-DAD player to only run 1 DAD because it makes the deck more consistent..... Hand Destruction is a -1 unless you are about to immediately plus from using it. Isn't really that good. Trunade is meh. I like Dust tornado over MST because of the fact that I also get to set. Plus I usually use my mst the way I would use a dust tornado anyway. The D-Prison is there for me to set it against my opponent's trump card. Either Stardust or armor master or bestiari... EDIT: So I just read the post above me....LOL Then what is a jump? Just a bigger version of a regional, which is just a bigger local? Lets not be silly. Also I played DAD Drain, that deck was amazing and I was amazing with it. If you drew horrible then you probably don't know how to play the deck yet. Everybody looked at my dadrain deck and swore it was terrible, but I always beat them with it. Oh and stacking is for lames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 People from all over the world trave to jumps, people in near by cities travel to regs. Stop being a fool and accept the fact that your deck is a fail in progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 People from all over the world trave to jumps' date=' people in near by cities travel to regs. Stop being a fool and accept the fact that your deck is a fail in progress.[/quote'] Agreed. Like PD said... 3/3/3= DEAD DRAW. Not to mention, firedog and rekindling are hugely situational. Draw rekindle with nothing in the grave. Draw dog without magician in the grave. This deck is awful. l guess your deck joins the ranks of those in your title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 This deck is good. The flamevell ratio is good. (Though I think that 2x Redkindling is better) The only problem is that it is an exact copy of Jeffrey Daniels' deck from the Greensboro regional. At least change some tech cards so the netdeck won't be obvious. :S ...Unless you are him or his teammate in which case I'm sorry for the stupid remark. :D Ignoring this: Play Whirlwind Weasel or Guard Dog over Des Koala. :} And after you change the ratios of Smashing Ground, DPrison and Dust Tornado, you will get my deck, so I shouldn't be the one to say that netdecking is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 This deck is good. The flamevell ratio is good. (Though I think that 2x Redkindling is better) The only problem is that it is an exact copy of Jeffrey Daniels' deck from the Greensboro regional. At least change some tech cards so the netdeck won't be obvious. :S ...Unless you are him or his teammate in which case I'm sorry for the stupid remark. :D Ignoring this: Play Whirlwind Weasel or Guard Dog over Des Koala. :} And after you change the ratios of Smashing Ground' date=' DPrison and Dust Tornado, you will get my deck, so I shouldn't be the one to say that netdecking is bad.[/s'] Yeah it is Jeffrey Daniels build. I liked his the best out of all the Flamvell Cat builds I saw over there, so I was like gotta show this forum so they can get up to date. Apparently they don't like new decks.... I don't do teams. Why bother? I'm up for perfection of an archetype so netdecking isn't THAT bad. I don't really do it that often. I've only legitimately netdecked twice since I've started playing this game. I loved those two decks. I couldn't help it lol. I love the fact that with the hamster you can put in some of the most jank stuff ever and it becomes broke.(Whirlwind Weasel) I just like the Koala because him and Ryko make a chaos sorcerer. Its my favorite card so I play it. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 This thread is loads of bad. The deck isn't bad. I don't like the 333 ratio. 332 is much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 This thread is loads of bad. The deck isn't bad. I don't like the 333 ratio. 332 is much better. Gee, I wonder whose fault that is? Maybe the guys that say a deck sucks even though its topped in multiple regionals in multiple areas around the USA? lol yugioh card maker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 This thread is loads of bad. The deck isn't bad. I don't like the 333 ratio. 332 is much better. Gee' date=' I wonder whose fault that is? Maybe the guys that say a deck sucks even though its topped in multiple regionals in multiple areas around the USA? lol yugioh card maker.[/quote'] You imply that it's my fault but blame other people? idgi :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.