BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 You guys, this deck is so good. I saw a variant at my regionals. I think it went 1-6, either that or it was 0-7. It was super consistent...oh wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 You guys' date=' this deck is so good. I saw a variant at my regionals. I think it went 1-6, either that or it was 0-7. It was super consistent...oh wait.[/quote'] He prolly sucks arse. tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 You guys' date=' this deck is so good. I saw a variant at my regionals. I think it went 1-6, either that or it was 0-7. It was super consistent...oh wait.[/quote'] He prolly sucks arse. tbh. Lol, I don't understand Oppression in a deck that tries to play Multiple Synchro summons. Also, the 3 dog, 3 magi, 3 Rekindeling is terrible. I've tried this deck since the format came out. I'd rather run a better deck like LS and Zombies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 This thread is loads of bad. The deck isn't bad. I don't like the 333 ratio. 332 is much better. Gee' date=' I wonder whose fault that is? Maybe the guys that say a deck sucks even though its topped in multiple regionals in multiple areas around the USA? lol yugioh card maker.[/quote'] You imply that it's my fault but blame other people? idgi :o No I'm not blaming you I'm blaming "the guys that say a deck sucks even though its topped in multiple regionals in multiple areas around the USA? lol yugioh card maker." You guys' date=' this deck is so good. I saw a variant at my regionals. I think it went 1-6, either that or it was 0-7. It was super consistent...oh wait.[/quote'] Like this guy. Thinking he's cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 icic.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 You guys' date=' this deck is so good. I saw a variant at my regionals. I think it went 1-6, either that or it was 0-7. It was super consistent...oh wait.[/quote'] Like this guy. Thinking he's cool. Firstly, What regionals did it top? and then links to prove it. Secondly, I've playtested FlamCats, and I personally didn't like them. Drew Clumped, and lost to Opression Thirdly, I saw a similar build go 1-6/0-7 at a regional on the fifth Fourthly, LSs and Zombies are still pretty good. Fifthly, this format is 10 days old. You shouldn't base the format off of 10 days. Especially since there hasn't been a Jump or major tournament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Wow. Someone has a huge ego. So your netdeck'd deck topped a reg or two. lt must have been luck, 'cause it damn sure ain't skill.Not to mention, maybe people would help you if you had a more... positive (Believe me, i'm being nice)... attitude. My opinion still stands about this deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 1About 2-7. Wild Guess. I know for sure 2 did.2Personally is the word.3Yousureitwasthesamedeck?4Whatdoesthishavetodowithanything?5Technically 16 days since the format list changed before March 1st.So your netdeck'd deck topped a reg or two. lt must have been luck' date=' 'cause it damn sure ain't skill.[/quote']ehrm. lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 1About 2-7. Wild Guess. I know for sure 2 did.2Personally is the word.3Yousureitwasthesamedeck?4Whatdoesthishavetodowithanything?5Technically 16 days since the format list changed before March 1st. 1) Proof?3) Pretty much4) I made a point about LS and Zombies still being good, and he goes on a personal attack on me. lol5) 10 days that you can play in official tournaments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 You guys' date=' this deck is so good. I saw a variant at my regionals. I think it went 1-6, either that or it was 0-7. It was super consistent...oh wait.[/quote'] Like this guy. Thinking he's cool. Firstly, What regionals did it top? and then links to prove it. Secondly, I've playtested FlamCats, and I personally didn't like them. Drew Clumped, and lost to Opression Thirdly, I saw a similar build go 1-6/0-7 at a regional on the fifth Fourthly, LSs and Zombies are still pretty good. Fifthly, this format is 10 days old. You shouldn't base the format off of 10 days. Especially since there hasn't been a Jump or major tournament. Give me a sec to go find the rest.http://www.pojo.biz/board/showthread.php?t=816576That's one guys report getting top 8. http://www.pojo.biz/board/showthread.php?t=756577 - That's the tracking thread. They are calling it Cat Synchro even though it's definitely Flamvell Cat. http://www.pojo.biz/board/showthread.php?t=805289&page=7 - Just control find Tyler Stokely. They call it Cat Synchro, but its def flamvell cat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 1About 2-7. Wild Guess. I know for sure 2 did.2Personally is the word.3Yousureitwasthesamedeck?4Whatdoesthishavetodowithanything?5Technically 16 days since the format list changed before March 1st. 1) Proof?3) Pretty much4) I made a point about LS and Zombies still being good' date=' and he goes on a personal attack on me. lol5) 10 days that you can play in official tournaments.[/quote']1dont have links. but dale bellido topped with monarch variant. tyler stokely topped another.3refering to 1, positive?adding to 1. argentums post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 1About 2-7. Wild Guess. I know for sure 2 did.2Personally is the word.3Yousureitwasthesamedeck?4Whatdoesthishavetodowithanything?5Technically 16 days since the format list changed before March 1st. 1) Proof?3) Pretty much4) I made a point about LS and Zombies still being good' date=' and he goes on a personal attack on me. lol5) 10 days that you can play in official tournaments.[/quote']1dont have links. but dale bellido topped with monarch variant. tyler stokely topped another.3refering to 1, positive?adding to 1. argentums post 1) Flamvell Monarchs is different than Flamvell Cat. 3) Positive. Note, I dislike the deck. I know it can do good, but I haven't seen it do good, in my testing the format, and at the regionals I went to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Wow. Someone has a huge ego. So your netdeck'd deck topped a reg or two. lt must have been luck' date=' 'cause it damn sure ain't skill.Not to mention, maybe people would help you if you had a more... positive (Believe me, i'm being nice)... attitude. My opinion still stands about this deck.[/quote'] lol you silly. I could care less of your opinion on the deck. That doesn't change the fact that its legit. 1About 2-7. Wild Guess. I know for sure 2 did.2Personally is the word.3Yousureitwasthesamedeck?4Whatdoesthishavetodowithanything?5Technically 16 days since the format list changed before March 1st. 1) Proof?3) Pretty much4) I made a point about LS and Zombies still being good' date=' and he goes on a personal attack on me. lol5) 10 days that you can play in official tournaments.[/quote'] sure. The personal attack was on you because you were the newest to attempt to say its a sheet deck, not because you mentioned LS. It seems we have a ton of regionals that have happened since the format change. Oh and I got a few of the links you wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Wow. Someone has a huge ego. So your netdeck'd deck topped a reg or two. lt must have been luck' date=' 'cause it damn sure ain't skill.Not to mention, maybe people would help you if you had a more... positive (Believe me, i'm being nice)... attitude. My opinion still stands about this deck.[/quote'] lol you silly. I could care less of your opinion on the deck. That doesn't change the fact that its legit. 1About 2-7. Wild Guess. I know for sure 2 did.2Personally is the word.3Yousureitwasthesamedeck?4Whatdoesthishavetodowithanything?5Technically 16 days since the format list changed before March 1st. 1) Proof?3) Pretty much4) I made a point about LS and Zombies still being good' date=' and he goes on a personal attack on me. lol5) 10 days that you can play in official tournaments.[/quote'] sure. The personal attack was on you because you were the newest to attempt to say its a s*** deck, not because you mentioned LS. It seems we have a ton of regionals that have happened since the format change. Oh and I got a few of the links you wanted. Except, I made valid points which you ignored. LS and Zombies are still good. Once a Jersey happens, we will probably see a healthy amount of GBs, Sabers and BWs, a mix LS, Zombies, FC, and Monarchs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 My larvae moth deck was legit too, lol silly. Does that make it good? Nope.So your logic (and this deck) is about as good as my opinion to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 I never said anything about LS and Zombies and I'm really confused as to why you keep tossing them into the discussion when they are irrelevant. We are definitely talking about Flamvell Cat Right now. I really expect the top tier to be more GB, LS, FC to be the big three...the rest are tier 1.5 really. BWs aren't fast anymore. Sabers aren't strong enough to beat anything unless you are good and even then there is only so much you can do. I know. I play the sabers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 I never said anything about LS and Zombies and I'm really confused as to why you keep tossing them into the discussion when they are irrelevant. We are definitely talking about Flamvell Cat Right now. I really expect the top tier to be more GB' date=' LS, FC to be the big three...the rest are tier 1.5 really. BWs aren't fast anymore. Sabers aren't strong enough to beat anything unless you are good and even then there is only so much you can do. I know. I play the sabers.[/quote'] Well, durrrr, I brought them up because A) They are seem to be a more consistent deck B) It was a counter argument to "this deck is so awesome" because these decks are still powerful. BWs overpower a lot of decks, they don't need to be fast. A BW player just can't player recklessly/bad. Sabers are underrated. Emmersblade is one of the best cards in the game right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 I'm sorry, did you just call Lightsworn consistent? Lightsworn is the definition of inconsistent. You never know what you are going to mill. It could be an epic broken mill or it could be all of your staple spells and traps. Don't be silly. The blackwings don't really overpower a lot of decks. If I can beat them with jank sabers, then they can't be all that. On the saber argument. I see where you are coming from. I love their effects, they just can't stand up to the rest of the decks out there right now. I really don't know. I'll comment on that more when I get some emmersblades, because as an X-saber player. I don't think I'll be able to make the proper argument until I have used the power of emmersblade for myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Join Network, we gonna take this down with INSECTS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 I'm sorry' date=' did you just call Lightsworn consistent? Lightsworn is the definition of inconsistent. You never know what you are going to mill. It could be an epic broken mill or it could be all of your staple spells and traps. Don't be silly. The blackwings don't really overpower a lot of decks. If I can beat them with jank sabers, then they can't be all that. On the saber argument. I see where you are coming from. I love their effects, they just can't stand up to the rest of the decks out there right now. I really don't know. I'll comment on that more when I get some emmersblades, because as an X-saber player. I don't think I'll be able to make the proper argument until I have used the power of emmersblade for myself.[/quote'] Lightsworns are more consistent then you think. Shiresworn, Krystiasworn, and Hamstersworn are all pretty nice variants. Again this is from what I've personally seen/tested/ BWs are still pretty good. They still have nice beaters, Kalut makes momentum changes. Over power doesn't always mean attack points. Icarus attack, One-sided oppressions, Solidarity is also very underrated. BWW makes every BW a gadget. Emmersblade makes the deck nuts, to be honest. It pulls out Ragigura/Fullhelmknight, and allows a better set up turn 1. It also gives them an easier way into Hunlei, and powers Saber Slash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 I'm sorry' date=' did you just call Lightsworn consistent? Lightsworn is the definition of inconsistent. You never know what you are going to mill. It could be an epic broken mill or it could be all of your staple spells and traps. Don't be silly. The blackwings don't really overpower a lot of decks. If I can beat them with jank sabers, then they can't be all that. On the saber argument. I see where you are coming from. I love their effects, they just can't stand up to the rest of the decks out there right now. I really don't know. I'll comment on that more when I get some emmersblades, because as an X-saber player. I don't think I'll be able to make the proper argument until I have used the power of emmersblade for myself.[/quote'] Lightsworns are more consistent then you think. Shiresworn, Krystiasworn, and Hamstersworn are all pretty nice variants. Again this is from what I've personally seen/tested/ BWs are still pretty good. They still have nice beaters, Kalut makes momentum changes. Over power doesn't always mean attack points. Icarus attack, One-sided oppressions, Solidarity is also very underrated. BWW makes every BW a gadget. Emmersblade makes the deck nuts, to be honest. It pulls out Ragigura/Fullhelmknight, and allows a better set up turn 1. It also gives them an easier way into Hunlei, and powers Saber Slash. Its Lightsworn, if the mechanic a deck is based on is pure and utter luck then its inconsistent. If you call Lightsworn consistent then you have to call that Arcana force flip a coin stuff consistent. I know what you mean by over powers most decks. Stop being silly. Solidarity is cute. I'd rather have the DAD to save my ass. BWW is at two, which makes them a hell of a lot easier to take down because they aren't always guaranteed their first turn +1. I mean you can run the rat and search out the knight first turn aswell and Hyunlei isn't really all that due to starlight road. Saber slash isn't nearly as good as people thought it would be. I only run 1 in my sabers because it doesn't really help me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Lightsworns are sack. I don't get why people disagree with this. Blind Milling shouldn't be winning games. Tempest, opinions don't matter. I don't even think you've seen this deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 i hav yvdzorz fancy proving that this deck is amazing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Lightsworns are sack. I don't get why people disagree with this. Blind Milling shouldn't be winning games. Tempest' date=' opinions don't matter. I don't even think you've seen this deck.[/quote'] Professional, l don't give a flying rat's ass. So you can sink that boat right now.And no, l haven't. However, since l have a headache today, l'll just stop here. Not in the mood to bicker like a little child. *yawn* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.dek Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Lightsworns are sack. I don't get why people disagree with this. Blind Milling shouldn't be winning games. Tempest' date=' opinions don't matter. I don't even think you've seen this deck.[/quote'] Professional, l don't give a flying rat's ass. So you can sink that boat right now.And no, l haven't. However, since l have a headache today, l'll just stop here. Not in the mood to bicker like a little child. *yawn*if you havent seen the deck, why the fuck are you commenting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.