Manjoume Thunder Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 So after some testing I realized that:1. Solidarity is bad.2. StarlightRoad.dek is boooooooring.3. Decree is fun, but not as competitive as Oppression.4. You shouldn't put YGO holos in the microwave. And i came up with this: 172x Red Gadget (Good in the LS match, because it's red and can match their speed)2x Green Gadget2x Yellow Gadget3x Doomcaliber Knight3x D.D. Chick (Lady or Assailant. I really can't choose :S)2x Cyber Dragon1x Tragoedia1x Spirit Reaper1x Neo-Spacian Grand Mole (anti-cat and BW tech)123x Smashing Ground3x Book of Moon2x Fissure1x Lightning Vortex1x Heavy Storm1x Mystical Space Typhoon1x Creature Swap (Testing it over 1 Fissure)113x Dimensional Prison2x Royal Oppression2x Bottomless Trap Hole1x Mirror Force1x Torrential Tribute1x Solemn Judgment1x Trap Dustshoot I am going to run this and/or Flamevell Kat until TSHD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 I would side 1 of those 2 Yellows, it's horrible in the mirror. This seems similar to Robbie Kohl's decklist, and his is decent, so I guess this is decent too :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted March 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 I would side 1 of those 2 Yellows' date=' it's horrible in the mirror. This seems similar to Robbie Kohl's decklist, and his is decent, so I guess this is decent too :P[/quote'] Yeah. Some techs (Swap and Reaper) were taken from him. And I think that 2x Yellow is mandatory so I can easily search for Green, who is fantastic in the BW match, because he can run over Gale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 I would side 1 of those 2 Yellows' date=' it's horrible in the mirror. This seems similar to Robbie Kohl's decklist, and his is decent, so I guess this is decent too :P[/quote'] Yeah. Some techs (Swap and Reaper) were taken from him. And I think that 2x Yellow is mandatory so I can easily search for Green, who is fantastic in the BW match, because he can run over Gale. Yeah, but he's got low defence because when you set Green you get raped by Bora.Which is why you main Red at 3. Yellow at 1 and Green at 2. How did you not know that? You've probably never run Gadgets before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rose Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 I would run Assailant over Lady, more people are gonna be runing glads this format, so it will be a nice tech.Brain Control? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuffyLaxer Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Maybe think about gorz. just a suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Yeah' date=' but he's got low defence because when you set Green you get raped by Bora.Which is why you main Red at 3. Yellow at 1 and Green at 2. How did you not know that? You've probably never run Gadgets before...[/quote'] I am so confused... though I really have never run Gadgets, so that is to be expected. Care to explain the reasons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Yeah' date=' but he's got low defence because when you set Green you get raped by Bora.Which is why you main Red at 3. Yellow at 1 and Green at 2. How did you not know that? You've probably never run Gadgets before...[/quote'] I am so confused... though I really have never run Gadgets, so that is to be expected. Care to explain the reasons? I you're running Yellow Gadget at 1 and Red Gadget at 3, you might as well not be running Gadgets because it makes 2 of the Red Gadgets lose their whole deck thinning purpose. Even makes all 3 lose it if you happen to draw the Yellow Gadget on your first turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I love YCM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Qalat, the only reason to run gadgets is the +1s... I think you know this ;). Otherwise you're better off with any other decktype that can run oppression. 3/2/1 is stupid the way running 2 Ryko in standard LS is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I love YCM. Then tell me why purposely turning 2 of your +1s into +0s is a good thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I love YCM. Then tell me why purposely turning 2 of your +1s into +0s is a good thing? It's not, but he thinks that BWs are such a huge threat that it is. I can see siding them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I love YCM. Then tell me why purposely turning 2 of your +1s into +0s is a good thing? It's not' date=' but he thinks that BWs are such a huge threat that it is. I can see siding them...[/quote'] I always main 2 of each Gadget and side 1 of each when I do anything involving Gadgets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Yeah, that's what I meant. ...running 6th gadget would be lulz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Yeah' date=' that's what I meant. ...running 6th gadget would be lulz[/quote'] I run "Whatever 6 over 41 is Gadget". My build turned out a lot like Father Wolf's though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Oh god, I love it even more so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 I would run Assailant over Lady' date=' more people are gonna be runing glads this format, so it will be a nice tech.[b']That's the reason I want to try Assailant over Warrior Lady, but I am not sure that this is enough.[/b]Brain Control?Not needed. Maybe think about gorz. just a suggestion. Eh, I just took it out, because I don't think that it will be worth the occasional dead draw. This format looks slower. I am definitely going to side it for some matches like Kat and LS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Oh god' date=' I love it even more so.[/quote'] I'm tired of your spam, so I'm giving you an ample warning. If I see more of your posts floating around in the Your Deck or TCG section that have been made after I posted this, I will neg you. On-topic: I playtested your deck. The Doomcaliber Knight's kept hurting me more than helping me and the Creature Swap didn't work out very well. But the deck is quite consistant. Even with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 You guys thought I was being serious about this? SERIOUSLY? ... I'm wondering if returning was a good idea. Also, fossil dyna is decent atm, because everyone else runs Oppression, try it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Oh god' date=' I love it even more so.[/quote'] I'm tired of your spam, so I'm giving you an ample warning. If I see more of your posts floating around in the Your Deck or TCG section that have been made after I posted this, I will neg you. On-topic: I playtested your deck. The Doomcaliber Knight's kept hurting me more than helping me and the Creature Swap didn't work out very well. But the deck is quite consistant. Even with them. What decks did you test against? And do you think that TKRO would've been better? Also' date=' fossil dyna is decent atm, because everyone else runs Oppression, try it?[/quote'] Booooooring.:S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 You see that kids, Manjy loves me so much I was quoted 3 times then. Fossil Dyna is good though Mangina. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 On-topic: I playtested your deck. The Doomcaliber Knight's kept hurting me more than helping me and the Creature Swap didn't work out very well. But the deck is quite consistant. Even with them. What decks did you test against? And do you think that TKRO would've been better? Yeah, it would have. I tested against my Gadgets, some Lightsworns at the cardshop in my town, a bunch of Gladiator Beasts (They run a lot of S/T destruction this format. Which was the problem. As soon as they saw a Gadget, they were withholding their S/T destructions for my Oppresions and whatnot.), Blackwings, Chaos varients (Twilight if you prefer that name), and several other lower tier decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted March 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 On-topic: I playtested your deck. The Doomcaliber Knight's kept hurting me more than helping me and the Creature Swap didn't work out very well. But the deck is quite consistant. Even with them. What decks did you test against? And do you think that TKRO would've been better? Yeah' date=' it would have. I tested against my Gadgets, some Lightsworns at the cardshop in my town, a bunch of Gladiator Beasts (They run a lot of S/T destruction this format. Which was the problem. As soon as they saw a Gadget, they were withholding their S/T destructions for my Oppresions and whatnot.), Blackwings, Chaos varients (Twilight if you prefer that name), and several other lower tier decks.[/quote'] Thanks for the info. I won't do any changes yet because I haven't had the chance to test the deck list, but I'll remember this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.