Lord Ursus Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 [align=center]Yeah, named after one of my old usernames. Anyways, enjoy. Made with MSE. The art is named Demonfire, and is the rightful property of Magic the Gathering and Greg Staples. I claim no ownership of it. Normal SpellLore: When you activate this card, select a monster on the field. During that monster's controller's Standby Phase, decrease its ATK by 300 and inflict 300 damage to both players. During your Standby Phase, you can discard 1 Spell Card to add this card from your Graveyard to your hand. [~ɸ~][/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexis Rhodes Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 Might be getting a big OP towards the end and dont use MSE 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 burn is a little bit TOO small it may be continuous, but it'll take too long to make a difference. I'd still stick with Ring of Destruction. Now, on the other hand if the burn and ATK drain was around 1000, I'd reconsider 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ursus Posted March 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 I think I'm free to use MSE if I want to. ;) It does wonders with the text box. The burn is not small at all, as you can cripple multiple monsters if you just recycle it and use it on new ones. Your opponent gains a lot of weakened monsters and both players gets burned for 300 for each monster you maim with this. Thank you for your comments, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ursus Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Bump. Comment people! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Pic is nice. Name is fitting.I like the burn effect, but me as a Burn Deck user would rather use a faster Burn stragety. So if the burn would be like 500m it would be more apearing. but for now its kinda UP.OCG is fine.A 7.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Repeated -1 for very small burn is not good at all. I don't think any "burn" Deck would run this, although burn doesn't really exist anymore anyways. Only OTKs and Flamvells really use burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyenn Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 I also agree that burn capability should be increased.During the Standby Phase of the selected monster's controller,...I suggest this to make it more reader-friendly, 3 possessive case after each other can be rather, well hard to read, or Idk, but it is usually avoided. (of course grammatically, your version is fine, too.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Might be getting a big OP towards the end and dont use MSE 6/10 lol he can do what every he likes, he won't let a guy with a tv show as his user dictat him. -1 for silly burn. Not really that good tbh. -Griffin let out the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ursus Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Hhm... I see what you mean. I'll increase the ATK drop to 600 and the burn to 500. Concidering the -1 in card advantage, the burn to both players is perhaps not needed. Opinions on this before I make it so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.