DARKPLANT RISING Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 [align=center]This rare dragon was bred inside the army of Goldd himself until maturing. He was later dispatched as a guard of the Dark World Gates along with the famous Renge, and has proved to be a great sentry since then. After many generations of guarding the Dark World from outer danger, Goldd's baby dragon became a gigantic monster of immeasurable defending abilities. Now just as strong as his former master, Goldd himself, this dragon is now the ultimate centry of any gate. [/align] What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Break Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 isn't it OP'd for the 1st card has 2200 DEF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubermetaknight Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 isn't it OP'd for the 1st card has 2200 DEF? No some four stars have 2200 def with positive effects eg. golem the moving fortress Very good vanillas kenta 10/10 though i suggest put the second one's attack to 1000 or lower otherwise it is slightly oped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightGuardian1764 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 isn't it OP'd for the 1st card has 2200 DEF? No some four stars have 2200 def with positive effects eg. golem the moving fortress Very good vanillas kenta 10/10 though i suggest put the second one's attack to 1000 or lower otherwise it is slightly oped. But the 2nd card has 3200 DEF! Normal Monster shouldn't have ATK oor DEF over 3000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubermetaknight Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 isn't it OP'd for the 1st card has 2200 DEF? No some four stars have 2200 def with positive effects eg. golem the moving fortress Very good vanillas kenta 10/10 though i suggest put the second one's attack to 1000 or lower otherwise it is slightly oped. But the 2nd card has 3200 DEF! Normal Monster shouldn't have ATK oor DEF over 3000. Yeah but destiny hero defender has 2700 defense even with a not so good effect it is just 4 stars. And your saying that a card with 500 that you have to tribute for is Oped. It can easily be killed by spells, traps, monster effects, some fusions and some effect monsters WITHOUT negative effects and infact postitive effects like super conductor tyranno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 3200 def is WAY too much for a lv6, drop it down to 2400 instead and they need spell/trap support anyway 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lily Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 3200 def is WAY too much for a lv6' date=' drop it down to 2400 instead and they need spell/trap support anyway 5/10[/quote'] Please, 3200 is fine for a Vanilla. I mean, that's like you writing to Konami about Flamvell GuardNot OPed at all. But yeah, these seem good. Descriptions are nice and they are nicely balanced and such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 3200 def is WAY too much for a lv6' date=' drop it down to 2400 instead [b']and they need spell/trap support anyway[/b] 5/10 Added on ignore list.isn't it OP'd for the 1st card has 2200 DEF? No some four stars have 2200 def with positive effects eg. golem the moving fortress Very good vanillas kenta 10/10 though i suggest put the second one's attack to 1000 or lower otherwise it is slightly oped. But the 2nd card has 3200 DEF! Normal Monster shouldn't have ATK oor DEF over 3000. Isn't stated in the rules. Besides, why? The background of this game is always changing. Once, 2500 was the highest ATK for a LV 6 vanilla. Now it's changed to 2600. Why can't 3000 be changed to 3100, or 3200? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.