Testament Dragon

[Jazin Kay]

 

I realized how this could be OPed, so I tacked on some added things. For starters, I had to make it unretrievable if it were milled. JD is abused heavily by doing that, so I had to find a place to draw a line. Multiple JD nukes are also abused, so I had to make this a "one shot or nothing" deal. That let me bump it's stats a tiny bit, but I won't dare push it higher.

 

I still think it's OPed, though. Eh, I tried. Can't blame me.

[Guest JoshIcy]

IIW maybe?

Well, it's like a 1 shot JD Baby (a strong one at that) since JD was limited or Semi'd. If the former it isn't too bad.

[Jolta]

Judgement Dragon is the Demigod, This card is probably the God...

 

Sorta balances it out as a nuker...

 

9/10

[Jazin Kay]

I can't get over how much this looks like JD. The head, tail, wings, even the pose, sorta.

 

Gotta be the most accurate support card I've ever made. It's almost like I requested it...

[Adogadog8]

This card is OPED but i dont even see how you could keep this effect and not lose the duel.

7/10 well thought out

[archie17]

To me it feels OP'ed, 1 lucky draw & discard and your ready to unleash this card. But this card's effect is nullified when a Lightsworn Deck goes against another Lightsworn Deck, adding some balance. I think the 3500 ATK is a little too high, maybe a 3200. The pic and name is very appropriate selection.

 

ALso is this going to be treated as "Semi-Limited" as well?

[Jazin Kay]

Hell, I'd limit this thing instantly.

[NightGuardian1764]

Maybe too Oped for me, but not for the others

9/10

[Jolta]

I can't get over how much this looks like JD. The head' date=' tail, wings, even the pose, sorta.

[/quote']

 

I totally thought the same thing! I was about to say "Sorry the monster is called Judgement Dragon"

 

Actually reminds me of people who use pictures of real monsters.

[archie17]

Possible balance:

 

Leaving everything as is, except instead of removing from play 1 JD from the Graveyard, you have to remove from play 2 JDs. You would have to sacrifice your LS trump card strategy and rely on Lightsworm monsters alone to win you the duel instead, or this would make a great finisher tactic.

[-Griffin]

I don't think I'd limit this - there's a good chance I'd only run 1 in the first place for consistency issues. 3x This and 2x Judgment, along with the mandatory 3x Beckoning, is looking awfully cloggy.

[~Oleon~]

"except by removing removing 1 "Judgement Dragon" in your Graveyard from play"

...I think you'll see the error here. ^^

 

Anyways, by this effect, it nukes ITSELF and then its RFP.

...I see this fitting in a worthy Skill Drain Deck.

 

It seems OPed at first - but the ATK and DEF doesn't matter that much - you won't be able to use it. So when JD is down, this rises, takes down the field for you, and abids itself ado.

 

11/10.

[Jazin Kay]

I don't see the error.

 

"Except by removing from play 1 "Judgment Dragon" in your Graveyard" is correct?

 

It doesn't nuke itself. It has the same destruction effect wording as JD, aside from the cost.

[~Oleon~]

It says on the card:

 

"Except by removing removing one "Judgement Dragon" in your Graveyard from play"

 

Love your Archive, by the way. ^^

[Jazin Kay]

Where does it say th.... oh piss.

 

Thank you's all around. Lol.

[Adogadog8]

Ya that just goes to show you how pathetic the human mind is like, I went to go go eat. I sucked at that. This card still seems a little OPED to me

[~Oleon~]

Thats because you don't understand it properly. When JD goes - it shows itself but is instantly killed by its own nuke. So it has one last blow at destroying the field and leaves...

 

Thank you's all round.

Welcome's all round. ;D

---

Sorry for the double post' date=' but you said it doesn't nuke itself.

 

destroy all cards on the field, except "Lightsworn" monsters.

Is 'Lightsworn' in this Dragons name?

I dunno, lemme go check.

I rezt mah case.

[archie17]

This card doesn't destroy itself it says "destroy all other cards on the field" NOT "destroy all cards on the field".

 

The card does remove itself but not destroys itself, meaning you can use it first during the Battle Phase to inflict 3500 damage (which I think is too much) after nuking the field. The only Deck that lessens this onslaught is an opposing Lightsworn Deck.

[Jazin Kay]

No, it says "all other cards". This excludes itself.

[archie17]

No' date=' it says "all other cards". This excludes itself.

[/quote']

 

Yeah I just pointed that out. :p

 

You consider the 2 JDs cost instead of the 1 to make it harder to use?

[Jazin Kay]

Yes, but if JD is limited, it'd make the card unsummonable.

 

Whereas if it's banned, this card also becomes unsummonable.

[archie17]

ah, i just think this only makes the LS Deck even more powerful, because this is a trump card of a trump card, so i figured something's got to give, and so i thought to sacrifice one trump for another. but oh well i see your point its a well thought out card overall, maybe the attack should be reduce to 3200 or even lesser than JD's ATK because its effect clears the field so you can do Direct Damage. Bad enough you clear the field, but you get an opening after to inflict massive direct damage with no cost and an easy requirement.

 

This(-1)+JD(-1)= -2 ___ causing a possible -10(realistically est. -4) + -3500 LPs

[~Oleon~]

Lol, just thought of a really big combo -

Foolish Burial

Sends JD

Summons TD

NUKE

Altered Room

Summon Merchant face-down

Flip it up

Keeps milling getting Wulfs and such.

Goes for the kill.

 

Keep up the good work. ;D

[Jazin Kay]

...

 

Your math hurt my head.

[~Oleon~]

Now I see how crazily OPed this card is.

You sir, have just overrun JD.