-SupernovA- Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 I tried to make a card that is made basically to take out cards like Stardust Dragon. [align=center]Black-Eyes Revolt DragonFIRE********Dragon / Fusion / Effect3000 / 0"Red Eyes Black Dragon" + "Lesser Dragon"This can also be treated as a DARK monster. You can Special Summon this card from your hand or Deck by removing from play 1 "Red-Eyes Black Dragon" and 1 "Lesser Dragon" from your Deck if your opponent controls a Level 8 or higher LIGHT monster. While this card is face-up on the field, Spell and Trap Cards targeting LIGHT monsters your opponent controls cannot be negated. Fixed"Red-Eyes Black Dragon" + "Lesser Dragon"This can also be treated as a DARK monster. You can Special Summon this card from your Extra Deck by removing from play 1 "Red-Eyes Black Dragon" and 1 "Lesser Dragon" from your Deck if your opponent controls a Level 8 or higher LIGHT monster. While this card is face-up on the field, Spell and Trap Cards targeting LIGHT monsters your opponent controls cannot be negated. Image Credit: Deviant Art[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 not Deck, you mean Extra Deck because it's a Fusion monster this will be hell on Lightsworns, so I like this very much 9.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadow wind Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 7/10BTW fusion monsters cant be in your hand only or side deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SupernovA- Posted March 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 not Deck' date=' you mean Extra Deck because it's a Fusion monster this will be hell on Lightsworns, so I like this very much 9.3/10[/quote'] 7/10BTW fusion monsters cant be in your hand only or side deck.Thanks for the feedback, I havn't dueled in a while so I completely forgot that Fusions don't go in the deck. =P I'll rewrite the effect below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 that's better, now that you rewrote it I'll raise my rate to 9.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 A 100% consistent Fusion at no advantage or set-up cost? This could have no effect other than the Summon condition and it would be broken. The effect just makes it a little -more- broken.Oh right, and Stardust is WIND, not LIGHT, so your card's effect won't work there, but it can still destroy it by battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dream Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 Epic Win. 8.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SupernovA- Posted March 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 A 100% consistent Fusion at no advantage or set-up cost? This could have no effect other than the Summon condition and it would be broken. The effect just makes it a little -more- broken.Oh right' date=' and Stardust is WIND, not LIGHT, so your card's effect won't work there, but it can still destroy it by battle.[/quote'] It's not broken, Book of Moon would tear this card apart, and most decks have it. Got me on Stardust's attribute though, but I was aiming it more toward LIGHT monsters because I've seen alot of LIGHT based decks that work on getting Stardust out and then high-level LIGHT monsters with Stardust to protect from traps ect. that's better' date=' now that you rewrote it I'll raise my rate to 9.7/10[/quote'] Epic Win. 8.7/10 Thanks. EDIT: Plus I wanted to possibly give a good enough reason to get a few massively unused cards slightly more useful, like Lesser Dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 Yeah, I can only see this working on JD since stardust is wind xD. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 What happened to Icy's well-written response?It is broken. Counterability is a secondary balance feature. This 100% splashable 100% consistent +1 field presence with an easy chance to OTK is broken on the primary balance factor of concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.