Netdecking

[DARKPLANT RISING]

I don't netdeck all the way. I see a deck I feel is strong, and I copy only the concept. Then I make my own deck with the same concept, just a little altered.

[.Gideon.]

problem is when a powerful Original deck sees play (like DAD decks), Konami kills those decks as soon as they appear, while they keep all those Frkn Overpowered archtypes without any damage.

 

 

Konami, Stupid Archtype slaves.

[Von Csent]

The reason Konami kills the original decks is because then we are not buying pack after pack to get all of the pieces of Exodia archetype X. We use a few cards here, a few cards there, a few we have had forever that are finally good, and bypassing the whole point of the archetype gimmick. Of course they will tear those decks apart.

[werewolfjedi]

I netdecked once, samurai lord's citadel deck, I just wanted to see how everyone else plays it.

 

did not end well for me most of the games, it just didn't fit my way of playing.

[Coffee Black]

Netdecking is a great idea. You can learn new strategies and creates ones too with the new knowledge' date=' creating a deck based on your own more thought-out concepts.

[/quote']

 

I wish it was that simple. I personally dislike netdecking, simply because so many decks work best in their original build, and since so many people netdeck, the game gets easily boring. I like the fact of learning new ideas and building on them, but that unfortunately doesn't go much farther then copying a deck card for card then making around 5 "techs" for it.