cmc1234 Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Im a little rusty i think? But you be the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icy God Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 ~"Hand" should be "hand" (2nd card)~On the 2nd card, 1st sentence, add a space after the period. .__. 9.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 really good 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LourDeath Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 2nd card... all face-up cards that means monsters, traps and spells only for two cards? anyways the first one is really nyc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRaptor10 Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 2nd card... all face-up cards that means monsters' date=' traps and spells only for two cards? anyways the first one is really nyc[/quote'] actually, it's 3 cards + 800 life points. i think it's balanced. 1st card: just a little bit overpowered if used in a beat down deck. your opponent would have no way of destroying the spell card. 8/10 2nd card: looks balanced and 9/10 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LourDeath Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 it's 2 1 Fire + 1 Waternot including that card... and spell and traps with elemental on it's name always pays for the four main element Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 ~"Hand" should be "hand" (2nd card)~On the 2nd card' date=' 1st sentence, add a space after the period. .__. 9.3[/quote']Thanks really good 9.5/10 Thanks 2nd card... all face-up cards that means monsters' date=' traps and spells only for two cards? anyways the first one is really nyc[/quote'] It means all face-up cards XD cant word it different 2nd card... all face-up cards that means monsters' date=' traps and spells only for two cards? anyways the first one is really nyc[/quote'] actually, it's 3 cards + 800 life points. i think it's balanced. 1st card: just a little bit overpowered if used in a beat down deck. your opponent would have no way of destroying the spell card. 8/10 2nd card: looks balanced and 9/10 :) No its just 2 cards. 1 WATER and 1 FIRE plus 800 LP And thanks it's 2 1 Fire + 1 Waternot including that card... and spell and traps with elemental on it's name always pays for the four main element What are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjack Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Let's start with first card. I actually like it. Very good and original. It sorta replaces Butterfly Dagger. The problem is your second card. No, i'm not gonna yell at you at how OP it is. I'm gonna yell at you at how UP it is Lightning Vortex has a very similar effect, but doesn't destroy s/t. And honestly, not much people actually use continuous s/t these days (Maybe field spell). Lightning vortex has a much smaller and easier cost. This card is flat out useless. You lose 3 cards which puts you in a serious hand disadvantage. Not to mention how hard it is to activate. What deck actually has BOTH WATER and FIRE? It's just WAY too much. You think you're reducing OPness but discarding any 2 cards without lp cost is too much.Seriously need to work on that card. For first card 9/10 (win)for 2nd card, 6/10 (fail)To add up the total, you get:fail+win=general 7.5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted April 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 alright i see what you mean. Thanks man ill edit it latr. but you only lose 2 cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.