Clair Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 [align=center]Here's another card I made. <3 It might be absolutely terrible, because I don't really know how often Spell Counters can pop up in a Duel, but I thought I might give this concept a try. Rate/Hate~ Effect: When this card is Normal Summoned, place 2 Spell Counters on it. As long as this card remains face-up on the field, neither player can activate Quick-Play Spell Cards. You can remove 2 Spell Counters from this card to place 1 Dark Spell Counter on a DARK monster you control (max. 1). A monster with a Dark Spell Counter gains ATK equal to its Level x100. During your End Phase, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the number of Dark Spell Counters on the field x700. During your Standby Phase, your opponent gains Life Points equal to the number of Spell Counters on the field x300.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adogadog8 Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 Ok, cool im not sure how spell counters work exactly but my opinion is you nailed it, nice pic, good balance, although nowadays, we dont really use effects to inflict damage to our opponent, we just attack them, but still good.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 The LP effect seems uneeded. You could have just lowered the burn effect to 400 instead, IMO... Oh, and this card can instantly become a 2800 ATK beater. YAY! I like that. Oh, and some Decks can produce lots of Spell Counters in one turn, infact, it sometimes leads to OTKs. But this is still very well done. The Quick Play Spell Negation balances itself, because u get most Spell Counters from activating any Spells, but then your opponent can't do anything either... Good. 8/10 Also, maybe change the name from Rajani, Master of the Dark Spells to Rajani, Master of the Dark Arts, IMO. It sounds cooler... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 The LP effect seems uneeded. You could have just lowered the burn effect to 400 instead' date=' IMO... Oh, and this card can instantly become a 2800 ATK beater. YAY! I like that. Oh, and some Decks can produce lots of Spell Counters in one turn, infact, it sometimes leads to OTKs. But this is still very well done. The Quick Play Spell Negation balances itself, because u get most Spell Counters from activating any Spells, but then your opponent can't do anything either... Good. 8/10 Also, maybe change the name from Rajani, Master of the Dark Spells to Rajani, Master of the Dark Arts, IMO. It sounds cooler...[/quote'] Maybe I should use that version of Burn. Or else it could be abused with Simochi. D: And name change is done. Great idea. ^^ Oh and thanks, Adog. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 The LP effect seems uneeded. You could have just lowered the burn effect to 400 instead' date=' IMO... Oh, and this card can instantly become a 2800 ATK beater. YAY! I like that. Oh, and some Decks can produce lots of Spell Counters in one turn, infact, it sometimes leads to OTKs. But this is still very well done. The Quick Play Spell Negation balances itself, because u get most Spell Counters from activating any Spells, but then your opponent can't do anything either... Good. 8/10 Also, maybe change the name from Rajani, Master of the Dark Spells to Rajani, Master of the Dark Arts, IMO. It sounds cooler...[/quote'] Maybe I should use that version of Burn. Or else it could be abused with Simochi. D: And name change is done. Great idea. ^^ Oh and thanks, Adog. ;D I haven't made a card for a while. Could you give me a quick type of monster I should make for the heck of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 DRAGUNZ Go Machine-Type. ;D I'm assuming you mean type of monster. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 DRAGUNZ Go Machine-Type. ;D I'm assuming you mean type of monster. xD Yeah. I should've said "not Machinez' date=' cuz I've already made a set around them.."[/s'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Hm. I knew you liked Machines for some reason. How about... Beast-Warrior? ;D Or any other under-supported type? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 TOO LATE! You'll see it in a moment. Oh, and where did you get that pic from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 All credit goes to Jazin Kay. There's a link to his archive in his sig. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Okay. I'll look. And It's done. Out of thin air. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 RAEG BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 Okay, RC. One last bump. -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted April 20, 2010 Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 There's not much else to talk about. Also, PLZ posts to my threads. Not trying to advertise or anything, but I'm desprate. >__< But if you made this into a set...more ppl would come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 Only you and Dog have commented, though. I'll look at your cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.