Draco Straybyrn Posted December 27, 2007 Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 Thank you for understanding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwhale Posted December 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 Any way let's get back 2 the reviews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted December 27, 2007 Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 "grammar same as ocg" NO! NO! NO! There is a big difference! Grammar is in essays and life! OCG is using specific wordings! If grammar was the same as OCG' date=' no one would be able to understand any cards, and each effect would have 100 different wordings! GRAMMAR =/= OCG![/quote'] He's got a really good point! I thought they were the same. lol this is what i have been saying all alongi saidOCG is what we useandGRAMMAR IS WHAT THE PEOPLE WHO DONT KNOW WHAT OCG IS, SAY!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHINI [THE CHAOS] Posted December 27, 2007 Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 Nice card Derek, it would be a good addition to the set. It's perfectly balanced with drawbacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted December 27, 2007 Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 alot going on but good ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwhale Posted December 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 Nice card Derek' date=' it would be a good addition to the set. It's perfectly balanced with drawbacks. [/size'] Thanks, Man. *sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHINI [THE CHAOS] Posted December 27, 2007 Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 Whats with the Sigh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Quite a few gramical errors. But I can clearly see what the effect is intended to be, and it seems to fit in the yugioh flow. As usual, awesome pic. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Diviner Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 8/10 REALLY GOOD ..but......Its VERY similar to Deity Mitsu's Duel Hare card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwhale Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Quite a few gramical errors. But I can clearly see what the effect is intended to be' date=' and it seems to fit in the yugioh flow. As usual, awesome pic. 7/10[/quote'] Thanks I Guess.. At least it fits the YGO Flow :-| 8/10 REALLY GOOD ..but......Its VERY similar to Deity Mitsu's Duel Hare card. Not Really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Diviner Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Yes it is only the last part is different but still good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MechManiac Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Nice card, but you should clarify when your opponent loses during 500 Life Points, like during your Standby Phase or Main Phase 1, otherwise pretty good 9/10 please look at my cards (in sig) if you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 I think that its fixed now.Thanks for the help. Thanks alot!That means alot coming from you guys but.. why not 10/10 could you point out the flaws? if a card has perfect OCG (impossible, just saying in your means), and a good-fitting picture, and its GOR balanced, it won't say the card is 10/10, or perfect in my terms! This may be a shock for some members, but cards CANNOT be perfect. it's just like with people: NOBODY is perfect. And do not flatten to someone's opinion - 10/10 or any other mark can point out one of two things: 1) the person who rates it that way really likes it, or 2) the person just want to get into your friend list/score a rep. In NEITHER of these 2 you actually deserved it: you cannot. Nobody can. Because perfect (10/10) doesn't exist :), get it now? If you are just making cards to get 10/10's - you're wrong.Personally I NEVER give 10/10, and a 8/10 from my side means actually as much as other people yell something about 100000000000000/10. *sees Bloodrun's post* Whoops. Looks like you've beaten me to it, my friend :) About the card, MechManiac is right. You can't just say "per turn", you MUST qualify when.The card is pretty worthless though. The pic is great, nothing to tell about. At last, about the OCG/Gramar issue, I will shoot the next one who dares to even compare those two terms... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 it's a great card and it really is balanced by it's attack. now go and make more cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Grammar problems, spell out attack, good pic. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathMonkey Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 If this card is flipped due to the attack of an opponent's monster, you may discard 1 card from your hand to negate the attack. Once per turn you may flip this monster into face-down Position. Your opponent loses 500 Life Points on the End Phase of a turn that this card is face-up. Each time this card successfully attacks, increase the ATK of this card by 200 points. --The bolded part is where I corrected it (I believe this is correct OCG). The End Phase part can be switched with Standby, Main Phase, etc, but you couldn't leave simply 'turn' in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 29, 2007 Report Share Posted December 29, 2007 didn't instinctmeister already use that picture? sorry if I'm late... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.