Shaco Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TableCloth358 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Nice Simple yet effctive... i see no OCG witch isnt hard seeing hoe simple this card is. 8/10 Though i could have expected something better From a Level 5 Memeber. But it's still good don't get me wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Nice Simple yet effctive... i see no OCG witch isnt hard seeing hoe simple this card is. 8/10 Though i could have expected something better From a Level 5 Memeber. But it's still good don't get me wrong. Thanks, I understand. I've been trying to make the effects of my newer cards simpler, as I had a tendency in the past to go a bit overboard on the effects. And I like how I made this card.It is usable against a good percent of cards used today, and is a decent defense against opponent's monsters that may increase their own attack, or cards you may use that increase your opponent's ATK as a drawback (Which there aren't many of, but could be created in the future, I suppose) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TableCloth358 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yeah true this card dose counter alot of the Meta deck like DAD and stuff and simple is good and easy to understand. Though the picture is well not very cardish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yeah true this card dose counter alot of the Meta deck like DAD and stuff and simple is good and easy to understand. Though the picture is well not very cardish... Ohhh, it's the picture you're concerned about. Yeah, I'd agree, I had a picture in mind (A warrior wielding a very small shield and a very large sword) but I couldn't find it for the longest time. After about 10 minutes of looking, I just searched for "Too Heavy Sword" And this is the first picture that I thought captured the essence of its effect effectively enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TableCloth358 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yes i can see that... would you mind of i PM'd you an image that is better suited? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yes i can see that... would you mind of i PM'd you an image that is better suited? By all means. Thanks, I'd certainly appreciate it. (To stay on topic) One of the decks I have a problem with at my local place is Flamevells, so this would screw all of them over, as they all only have 200 Def. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TableCloth358 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Oh they would all die lol basicly. Are you going to make this idea into a Set? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Oh they would all die lol basicly. Are you going to make this idea into a Set? I have no immediate intentions to, but if I did it would probably consist of a lot of cards that lowered defense, or increased my opponent's ATK as a cost. I don't know that I would need to, though. It's a general enough card to be used enough without having to dedicate a set to it. Oh, and Zombies. They all have generally low defense, and are used enough, to suffer from this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TableCloth358 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Oh okay well i actualy think thats a good idea for a Cost. lol to raise ATK. it's diffrent. lol you can run with it lol. and zombies would fall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.